Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
165 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
12
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Local effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
22 mg/kg bw/day
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
48
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Additional information - workers

In instances where stable aerosol formation is expected, a value of 10 mg/m3 will be used as an operational control limit for inhalation exposure.

The potential exposure to the test material indicates that long-term exposure DNELs need to be derived for workers and for the general population. No acute toxicity was noted in any of the toxicological studies conducted. Additionally, DNELs derived for chronic exposures are typically lower than those calculated for acute exposures and would therefore be protective of human for both the acute and chronic exposures. 

 

Dermal and inhalation are the relevant routes of exposure. Hydrocarbons C13 -C20 have vapor pressures that are relatively low, typically  <0.01 kPa and vapor concentrations are expected to be relatively low. The likelihood of exposure to vapors from these solvents at potentially harmful levels is not expected. Aspiration is a potential hazard, but a DNEL calculation is not appropriate for an aspiration hazard.

 

Workers are expected to have infrequent and short-term exposures; however, for calculation of the DNEL for REACH purposes it is assumed that workers have maximal repeated exposure for 8 hr/day for 5 day/week.

Assessment factors were chosen on the basis of ECETOC (2003) and other, more recent information. For route to route extrapolation, absorption differences were not taken into account.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
35 mg/m³
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
20
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

Local effects

Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
13 mg/kg bw/day
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
80
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
13 mg/kg bw/day
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
80
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Additional information - General Population

The potential exposure to the test material indicates that long-term exposure DNELs need to be derived for general population. No acute toxicity was noted in any of the toxicological studies conducted. Additionally, DNELs derived for chronic exposures are typically lower than those calculated for acute exposures and would therefore be protective of human for both the acute and chronic exposures. 

 

Dermal and inhalation are the relevant routes of exposure. An oral DNEL was calculated for use in an indirect exposure assessment; the oral route is not expected to be a significant exposure route. Aspiration is a potential hazard, but a DNEL calculation is not appropriate for an aspiration hazard.

 

Consumers in the general population are expected to have infrequent and short-term exposures. However, for calculation of DNELs for REACH, it is assumed that consumers have a maximal repeated dose for 24 hr/day for 7 day/wk.

Assessment factors were chosen on the basis of ECETOC (2003) and other, more recent information. For route to route extrapolation, absorption differences were not taken into account.