Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
August 6th, 1991 - August 30th, 1991
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
; lack of details on test substance; no data on reliability check
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C16-18, 2-ethylhexyl esters
EC Number:
292-951-5
EC Name:
Fatty acids, C16-18, 2-ethylhexyl esters
Cas Number:
91031-48-0
Molecular formula:
Not applicable, substance is a UVCB.
IUPAC Name:
91031-48-0
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Fatty acids, C16-18, 2-ethylhexyl esters
- Physical state: colourless liquid
- Batch number: 90068
- Storage: at room temperature
- No further details given.

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Lebeau breeding centre, Gambais, France
- Age at study initiation: approx. 5 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: male mean 436 g, female mean 423 g
- Housing: individual housing in polycarbonate cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum (guinea pigs sustenance ref. 106 (U.A.R., France)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 25
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
paraffin oil
Concentration / amount:
Induction: three pairs of intradermal injection (One of each pair was injected on each side of the midline and from cranial (1) to Caudal (3)
1. 1:1 mixture of Freuds´complete adjuvant with 0.9% sodium chloride
2. Test substance (25%) in paraffin oil
3. 1:1 mixture of the undiluted test substance with Freuds´complete adjuvant and 0.9% sodium chloride
The epidermal induction was done with 100% test substance 24 h after a local irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate in vaseline

Challenge: 50% test substance in paraffin oil
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
paraffin oil
Concentration / amount:
Induction: three pairs of intradermal injection (One of each pair was injected on each side of the midline and from cranial (1) to Caudal (3)
1. 1:1 mixture of Freuds´complete adjuvant with 0.9% sodium chloride
2. Test substance (25%) in paraffin oil
3. 1:1 mixture of the undiluted test substance with Freuds´complete adjuvant and 0.9% sodium chloride
The epidermal induction was done with 100% test substance 24 h after a local irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate in vaseline

Challenge: 50% test substance in paraffin oil
No. of animals per dose:
20
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Based on the results of a preliminary study a 25% dilution of the test substance in paraffin oil was used for intradermal induction and the undiluted (100%) substance was used for the epidermal induction exposure. The undiluted test substance was found to be slightly irritating upon dermal application.
A 50% test substance concentration was selected for the challenge phase as the maximum non-irritant dose upon dermal exposure for 24 h under occlusive dressing.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Exposure period: Intradermal induction on day 1. On day 7 a local irritation was induced using 0.5 mL of a 10 % sodium laurylsulphate in vaseline. On day 8 a epidermal induction was performed with 0.5 mL vehicle or 0.5 mL test substance. The dermal applications were held in place for 48 hours under occlusive dressing.
- Test groups: 20 animals, TS
- Control group: 10 animals treated with vehicle only
- Site: the scapular region of both sides
- Concentrations: 0.1 mL of 25% dilution of the test substance in paraffin oil was used for intradermal induction and 0.5 mL of the undiluted (100%) test substance was used for epidermal induction
- Duration: 10 days

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 12 days after the last induction treatment
- Exposure period: 24 h under occlusive dressing
- Test groups: 20 animals, TS
- Control group: 10, treated analogous to the test groups
- Site: the right flank was treated with the test substance; the left flank was treated with vehicle.
- Concentrations: 0.5 mL of a 50% solution in paraffin oil
- Evaluation (hr after challenge):24 and 48 h after removal of the dressing
Positive control substance(s):
no

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Challenge readings

 

Group

Sex

Animals

24 h scoring period

48 h scoring period

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

LF

RF

LF

RF

LF

RF

LF

RF

Control

Males

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Females

16

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

18

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

19

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

20

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Treated

Males

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

8

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

9

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

12

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

13

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

14

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

15

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Females

21

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

22

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

23

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

25

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

26

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

27

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

28

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

29

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

30

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

No deaths occured. No significant differences in the gain of body weight was observed between treatment and control group.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Under the given conditions the test substance was not sensitising to guinea pig skin.
Executive summary:

A Guinea pig maximization test was performed according to OECD Guideline 406. 20 test and 10 control animals (Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs) were challenged with a 50 % test substance solution in paraffin oil. 24 and 48 hours after termination of challenge exposure skin readings revealed no indications for a skin sensitising potential of Fatty acids, C16-18, 2-ethylhexyl esters.