Polyphosphoric acids, ammonium salts

Skin sensitisation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)

Type of information:

migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)

Adequacy of study:

weight of evidence

Study period:

01 February 2010 to 18 February 2010

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: see 'Remark'

Remarks:

The study was conclusive, performed to a valid guideline (OECD TG 429, adopted 24 April 2002) and was conducted under GLP conditions. No deviations from the test methods were noted. The reliability has been assigned in accordance with 'practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories' which states that the maximum reliability for a read-across study is 2. The study is considered to be adequate and reliable for the purpose of registration under REACH (Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006) as part of a weight of evidence approach. Read-across in accordance with Annex XI, Section 1.5 of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH) is justified on the following basis: Polyphosphoric acids, ammonium salt (also known as ammonium polyphosphate) is a mixture of oligomeric species of ammonium phosphate. When analysed the substance appears to consist mainly of ammonium orthophosphates, ammonium diphosphate and ammonium triphosphate. As such it is considered to be appropriate to read across from substances containing these species and a weight of evidence from the following substance is presented for this endpoint: - Ammonium dihydrogenorthophosphate (EC No. 231-987-8); provides data on the ammonium ion and the orthophosphate ion - Sodium acid pyrophosphate (EC No. 231-835-0); provides date on the diphosphate ion - Sodium tripolyphosphate (EC no. 231-838-7); provides data on the triphosphate ion

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2010

Report date:

2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)

Deviations:

no

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)

Deviations:

no

Test guideline 3

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes

Type of study:

mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

Diammonium hydrogenorthophosphate

EC Number:

231-987-8

EC Name:

Diammonium hydrogenorthophosphate

Cas Number:

7783-28-0

Molecular formula:

H9N2O4P

IUPAC Name:

diammonium hydrogen phosphate

Test material form:

solid: crystalline

Details on test material:

- Name of test material (as cited in study report): diammonium hydrogenorthophosphate
- CAS Number: 7783-28-0
- Physical state: white crystals
- Analytical purity: 99.8%
- Lot/batch No.: 0907099
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 03 February 2011 (allocated by NOTOX, 1 year after receipt of the test substance)
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark
- Stability under storage conditions: stable

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:

mouse

Strain:

CBA

Sex:

female

Details on test animals and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Preliminary irritation study: Charles River France, L'Arbresle Cedex, France; Main study: Harlan, Horst, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: Approximately 8-14 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 17-22 g
- Housing: Individual housing in labelled Macrolon cages (MI type; height 12.5 cm) containing sterilised sawdust as bedding material (Litalabo, S.P.P.S., Argenteuil, France). Paper (Enviro-dri, WM. Lilico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom) was supplied as cage-enrichment. The paper was removed on Day 1 prior to dosing and was supplied again after scoring of the ears on Day 3.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF Spezialdiaten GmbH, Soest, Germany) provided ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water provided ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days before the start of treatment under laboratory conditions.


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.0 ± 3.0 °C (actual range: 18.9 - 22.9 °C)
- Humidity (%): 40-70% (actual range 38-84%)
- Air changes (per hr): Approximately fifteen
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs dark/ 12 hrs light

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:

propylene glycol

Concentration:

0, 10, 25, 50 % w/w

No. of animals per dose:

5

Details on study design:

RANGE FINDING TESTS:

Two test substance concentrations were tested; a 25% and 50% concentration.The test system, procedures and techniques were identical to those used during Days 1 to 3 of the main study unless otherwise specified. Two young adult animals were selected (8-14 weeks old). Each animal was treated with one concentration on three consecutive days. Approximately 3-4 hours after the last exposure, the irritation of the ears was assessed. Bodyweights were determined on Day 3. The animals were sacrificed after the final observation and no necropsy was performed.


MAIN STUDY

Three groups of five animals were treated with one test substance concentration per group. The highest test substance concentration was selected from the preliminary irritation study.
One group of five animals was treated with vehicle and another group of five animals was treated with a positive control substance.
Group: 1 Animal numbers: 01-05 Induction: (test substance; % w/w) 0
Group: 2 Animal numbers: 06-10 Induction: (test substance; % w/w) 10
Group: 3 Animal numbers: 11-15 Induction: (test substance; % w/w) 25
Group: 4 Animal numbers: 16-20 Induction: (test substance; % w/w) 50
Positive Control - Group: 5 Animal numbers: 21-25 Induction: (test substance; % w/w) 25

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:

The test substance formulations (w/w) were prepared within 4 hours prior to each treatment at concentrations specified above. No adjustment was made for specific gravity of the vehicle. Homogeneity was obtained to visually acceptable levels.

The dorsal surface of both ears was epidermally treated (25 μL/ear) with the test substance concentration, at approximately the same time per day. The concentrations were mixed thoroughly using a vortex mixer immediately prior to dosing.

The vehicle and positive control animals were treated the same as the experimental animals, except that the vehicle and/or positive control substance was administered instead of the test substance.

Excision of the nodes - Day 6
All animals:
Each animal was injected via the tail vein with 0.25 mL of sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) containing 20 μCi of 3H-methyl thymidine (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA, US).
After approximately five hours, all animals were killed by intraperitoneal injection with Euthasol® 20% (AST Farma BV, Oudewater, The Netherlands). The draining (auricular) lymph node of each ear was excised. The relative size of the nodes (as compared to normal) was estimated by visual examination and abnormalities of the nodes and surrounding area were recorded. The nodes were pooled for each animal in approximately 3 mL PBS.

Tissue processing for radioactivity - Day 6
A single cell suspension of lymph node cells (LNC) was prepared in PBS by gentle separation through stainless steel gauze (diameter 125 μm). LNC were washed twice with an excess of PBS by centrifugation at 200g for 10 minutes at 4ºC. To precipitate the DNA, the LNC were exposed to 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) stored in the refrigerator until the next day.

Radioactivity measurements - Day 7
Precipitates were recovered by centrifugation, resuspended in 1 mL TCA and transferred to 10 mL of Ultima Gold cocktail (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA, US) as the scintillation fluid. Radioactive measurements were performed using a Packard scintillation counter (2800TR). Counting time was to a statistical precision of ± 0.2% or a maximum of 5 minutes whichever came first. The scintillation counter was programmed to automatically subtract background and convert Counts Per Minute (CPM) to Disintegrations Per Minute (DPM).

Observations
Mortality/Viability Twice daily.
Toxicity At least once daily.
Body weights On Days 1 (pre-treatment) and 6.
Necropsy No necropsy was performed according to protocol.
Irritation On Day 3 (3-4 hours after treatment), the skin reactions were assessed. Skin reactions were graded according to Draize scoring system. Furthermore descriptions of all other (local) effects were recorded.

Positive control substance(s):

hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:

No irritation was observed in any of the animals examined. Based on these results, the highest test substance concentration selected for the main study was a 50% concentration.
The positive control group added to the study showed that the vehicle is suitable for eliciting a SI of >3 in this batch of animals and procedures for this study used. The six monthly reliability check with Alpha-Hexylcinnamicaldehyde, indicates that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at NOTOX is an appropriate model for testing for contact hypersensitivity.

In vivo (LLNA)

Results

Results 1

Parameter:

SI

Remarks on result:

other: The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 0.7, 1.1 and 1.1 respectively. There was no indication that the test substance elicits an SI ≥ 3 when tested up to 50%.

Results 2

Parameter:

other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)

Remarks on result:

other: The DPM values for the substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 464, 740 and 718 respectively.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Skin reactions / Irritation (Table 2)

No irritation of the ears was observed in any of the animals examined. All positive control animals showed slight to well-defined erythema. No oedema was observed in any of the animals examined.

Macroscopy of the auricular lymph nodes and surrounding area (Table 2)

All auricular lymph nodes of the animals of the experimental and control groups were considered normal in size, except for one or both lymph nodes of one animal at 25% (no. 12) and one animal at 50% (no. 19). The auricular lymph nodes of the positive control group were all enlarged. No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted in any of the animals.

Body weights (Table 2)

Body weights and body weight gain of experimental animals remained in the same range as controls over the study period. The slight body weight loss, noted in some animals, was considered not toxicologically significant.

Radioactivity measurements (Tables 3 and 4)

Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 464, 740 and 718 DPM respectively. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 672 DPM and a mean DPM/animal value of 5370 DPM was obtained from the positive control group.

Toxicity and mortality No mortality occurred and no symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study.

Table 1: Skin reactions after epidermal exposure and body weights

Animal number	Test substance (%w/w)	Day 1	Day 3
		Body Weight (g)	skin reactions dorsal surface ear				Body weight (g)
			left		right
			erythema	oedema	erythema	oedema
1	25^2	19	0	0	0	0	18
2	50^2	20	0	0	0	0	19

²Applied using a pipette with the tip cut off

Table 2: Skin reactions, body weights and relative size auricular lymph nodes

Group	Animal number	Test substance (%w/w)	Day 1	Day 3				Day 6
			Body Weight (g)	skin reactions dorsal surface ear				Body weight (g)	size nodes
				left		right			left	right
				erythema	oedema	erythema	oedema
1	1	0% (vehicle)	19	0	0	0	0	21	n	n
	2		20	0	0	0	0	20	n	n
	3		19	0	0	0	0	19	n	n
	4		20	0	0	0	0	20	n	n
	5		22	0	0	0	0	23	n	n
2	6	10%^2	20	0	0	0	0	20	n	n
	7		20	0	0	0	0	20	n	n
	8		22	0	0	0	0	20	n	n
	9		21	0	0	0	0	22	n	n
	10		21	0	0	0	0	21	n	n
3	11	25%^2	20	0	0	0	0	21	n	n
	12		22	0	0	0	0	21	+	+
	13		19	0	0	0	0	19	n	n
	14		18	0	0	0	0	20	n	n
	15		21	0	0	0	0	21	n	n
4	16	50%^2	21	0	0	0	0	21	n	n
	17		20	0	0	0	0	20	n	n
	18		22	0	0	0	0	22	n	n
	19		21	0	0	0	0	21	+	n
	20		19	0	0	0	0	20	n	n
5	21	25%hexylcinnamicaldehyde	17	2	0	1	0	19	++	++
	22		20	1	0	2	0	21	++	++
	23		21	1	0	1	0	22	++	++
	24		21	1	0	1	0	22	++	++
	25		18	2	0	1	0	20	++	++

²Applied using a pipette with the tip cut off

Table 3: Radioactivity measurements (individual animals)

Group	Animal number	Test substance (%w/w)	DPM/animal
1	1	0% (vehicle)	386
	2		^579
	3		516
	4		1056
	5		824
2	6	10%	536
	7		^377
	8		482
	9		167
	10		759
3	11	25%	221
	12		1011
	13		1001
	14		573
	15		894
4	16	50%	491
	17		1121
	18		927
	19		281
	20		767
5	21 22 23 24 25	25%hexylcinnamicaldehyde	6018
			6249
			4119
			5916
			4547

 

Table 4: Disintegrations Per Minute (DPM) and Stimulation Index (SI)

group	test substance (% w/w)	mean
		DPM ± SEM	SI ± SEM
2	10	464 ± 97	0.7 ± 0.2
3	25	740 ± 152	1.1 ± 0.3
4	50	718 ± 152	1.1 ± 0.3
5	25 % HCA	5370 ± 432	8.0 ± 1.6
1	0% (vehicle)	672 ± 119	1.0 ± 0.3

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

not sensitising

Remarks:

Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU

Conclusions:

The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 0.7, 1.1 and 1.1 respectively.
Since there was no indication that the test substance elicits an SI ≥ 3 when tested up to 50%, Diammonium hydrogenorthophosphate was considered not to be a skin sensitizer. It was established that the EC3 value (the estimated test substance concentration that will give a SI =3) (if any) exceeds 50%.
The positive control group added to the study showed that the vehicle is suitable for eliciting an SI>3 in this batch of animals and procedures for this study used. The six monthly reliability check with Alpha-Hexylcinnamicaldehyde, indicates that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at NOTOX is an appropriate model for testing for contact hypersensitivity.
Based on these results diammonium hydrogenorthophosphate would not be regarded as skin sensitizer according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines and does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labeling requirement for sensitization by skin contact according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2007) and the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures.

Executive summary:

In the main study, three experimental groups of five female CBA/J mice were treated with test substance concentrations of 10, 25 or 50% w/w on three consecutive days, by open application on the ears. Five vehicle control animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle alone (propylene glycol ). Three days after the last exposure, all animals were injected with 3H-methyl thymidine and after five hours the draining (auricular) lymph nodes were excised. After precipitating the DNA of the lymph node cells, radioactivity measurements were performed. The activity was expressed as the number of Disintegrations Per Minute (DPM) and a stimulation index (SI) was subsequently calculated for each group.

Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 464, 740 and 718 DPM respectively. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 672 DPM and a mean DPM/animal value of 5370 DPM was obtained from the positive control group.

The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 0.7, 1.1 and 1.1 respectively.

Since there was no indication that the test substance elicits an SI ≥ 3 when tested up to 50%, Diammonium hydrogenorthophosphate was considered not to be a skin sensitizer. It was established that the EC3 value (the estimated test substance concentration that will give a SI =3) (if any) exceeds 50%.

The positive control group added to the study showed that the vehicle is suitable for eliciting an SI>3 in this batch of animals and procedures for this study used. The six monthly reliability check with Hexylcinnamaldehyde, indicates that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at NOTOX is an appropriate model for testing for contact hypersensitivity.

Based on these results Diammonium hydrogenorthophosphate would not be regarded as skin sensitizer according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines and does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labeling requirement for sensitization by skin contact according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2007) and the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures.