Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study appears to be well conducted. No evidence that GLP was followed, but likely conducted in the spirit of GLP. Study used an appropriate number fo animals to assess the endpoint.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Doses:
Males - 500mg, 1000mg, 2000mg, 8000mg
Females - 250 m, 500mg, 1000mg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Males
500 mg = 5
1000 mg = 5
2000 mg = 5
8000 mg = 2

Females
250 mg = 5
500 mg = 5
1000 mg = 5
Control animals:
no
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
1 410 mg/kg bw
95% CL:
> 800 - < 2 490
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
540 mg/kg bw
95% CL:
> 360 - < 790
Interpretation of results:
harmful
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Female rats appeared to be more sensitive to the effects of the test material. Based on the LD50 value reported for the female rats, the substance meets the criteria for classification as Harmful in the EU.
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Standard Acute toxicity methodolgy followed - Rats dosed with test substance and then observed for up to 14 days. However rats were dosed with both test material solution and then an equal volume of water to assess the effect of dilution on the acute toxicity.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Doses:
Males:
16 ml/kg = 4 g/kg bw
8 ml/kg = 2 g/kg
4 ml/kg = 1 g/kg
2 ml/kg = 0.5 g/kg
1ml/kg = 0.25 g/kg

Females:
4 ml/kg = 1 g/kg
2 ml/kg = 0.5 g/kg
1 ml/kg = 0.25 g/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Males:
2 animals per dose for the 0.25g/kg dose group, 5 animals per dose for the other dose groups total = 22

Females:
5 animals per dose group. Total = 15
Control animals:
no
Key result
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
5.66 mL/kg bw
95% CL:
> 3.35 - < 9.55
Remarks on result:
other: as 25% w/v in corn oil
Key result
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
1 420 mg/kg bw
95% CL:
> 838 - 2 388
Remarks on result:
other: as test substance
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
1 620 mL/kg bw
95% CL:
> 1 180 - < 2 240
Remarks on result:
other: as 25% w/v in corn oil
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
400 mg/kg bw
95% CL:
> 295 - < 560
Remarks on result:
other: as test substance
Interpretation of results:
Category 4 based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The acute toxicity of the test substance does not appear to be moderated by the subsequent dosing of an equal volume of water.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification