Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2020
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2020

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Reaction products of 2,2'-(1,3-phenylenebis(oxy))diethanol with 2-(phenoxymethyl)oxirane and 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate
Cas Number:
1431303-59-1
Molecular formula:
Not assigned for UVCB substance.
IUPAC Name:
Reaction products of 2,2'-(1,3-phenylenebis(oxy))diethanol with 2-(phenoxymethyl)oxirane and 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source (i.e. manufacturer or supplier) and lot/batch number of test material: All test articles will be supplied by the Sponsor. Lot# 6252020
- Purity, including information on contaminants, isomers, etc.: No data.

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature and humidity and in a dark cabinet.
- Stability and homogeneity of the test material in the vehicle/solvent under test conditions (e.g. in the exposure medium) and during storage: No data.
- Stability in the medium, i.e. sensitivity of the test material to hydrolysis and/or photolysis: No data.
- Solubility and stability of the test material in the solvent/vehicle and the exposure medium: No data.
- Reactivity of the test material with the incubation material used (e.g. plastic ware): No data.

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing (e.g. warming, grinding): The test article was used as received, warmed in an incubator at 33ºC prior to dosing.
- Preliminary purification step (if any): No.
- Final concentration of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: Surfactants will be tested at a concentration of 10% weight/volume or volume/volume
(v/v) in 0.9% physiological saline (or other vehicle as specified by the Sponsor). All
other liquids are tested undiluted.

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
cattle
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Cattle. Bovine eyes (at least six months old) will be obtained from an abattoir and will be transported to the laboratory in a refrigerated container containing Hanks’ Balanced
Salt Solution (HBSS) with penicillin-streptomycin.

Test system

Vehicle:
Hank's balanced salt solution
Controls:
yes, concurrent vehicle
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 ml
- Concentration (if solution):Solid test articles will be prepared as a 20% solution or suspension in 0.9% physiological saline

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 ml.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
After 10 (±1) minutes, the test article,
ethanol, or MEM was removed from the epithelium of the cornea and anterior chamber of the holder by
washing with MEM solution containing phenol red. A final rinse was made with MEM without phenol red.
The anterior and posterior chambers of the holders were then refilled with fresh MEM solution.
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
All corneas will be incubated at 32 (±1)°C until immediately prior to the two hour scores, at which time the MEM solution in the anterior and posterior
chambers will be removed and the holders refilled with fresh MEM solution
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 3

NEGATIVE CONTROL USED : 3

SOLVENT CONTROL USED (if applicable) : 3

POSITIVE CONTROL USED : 3

APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME : A volume of 0.75 ml of the liquid test article, MEM solution or ethanol will be applied to the epithelium in a manner that ensures the entire cornea will be covered. 10 minute exposure.

TREATMENT METHOD: closed chamber

POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: yes/no. If YES please specify duration

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: After 10 (±1) minutes, the test article,
ethanol, or MEM was removed from the epithelium of the cornea and anterior chamber of the holder by washing with MEM solution containing phenol red. A final rinse was made with MEM without phenol red. The anterior and posterior chambers of the holders were then refilled with fresh MEM solution.

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: Yes
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of [UV/VIS spectrophotometry / microtiter plate reader] (OD490)
- Others (e.g, pertinent visual observations, histopathology): (please specify)

SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)

DECISION CRITERIA: Criteria defined in TG 437.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
Mean
Value:
-0.62
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
fluorescein leakage
Remarks:
Corrected Mean optical density
Run / experiment:
Mean
Value:
0.003
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Run / experiment:
Mean
Value:
-0.66
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: None.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the results of the study, ERGP-IEM is not considered an eye irritant.
Executive summary:

The corneal irritation and damage potential of ERGP-IEM was evaluated in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test (BCOP). The study was performed in compliance with EPA GLP 40 CFR 160 and 792, FDA GLP 21 CFR 58, and OECD GLP (1997). The test method was based on OECD 437 (2009). A pretest was performed to measure pre-exposure opacity of the test corneas against the control corneas blanks. The corneas were prepared in cell culture and incubated at 32˚C for at least 1 hour prior to exposure. For the BCOP exposure, corneas (3/test article) were treated with 0.75 mL of undiluted liquid expressed from the test article and then were incubated at 32˚C for 10 minutes. At the end of the exposure, the corneas were washed and incubated in fresh medium for an additional 2 hours. Opacity was evaluated using an opacitometer after the 2 hour post-exposure incubation. Following opacity readings, the cell culture medium was replaced with Na-fluorescein medium and incubated for approximately 90 minutes. Following the 90 minute exposure, permeability was measured. The mean in vitro irritation score (IVIS) was calculated and the scores were classified according to protocol defined categories. Ocular exposure to ERGP-IEM in the test resulted in an IVIS = -0.62, the mean opacity was -0.66 and the mean permeability score was 0.003. Based on the results of the study, ERGP-IEM is not considered an eye irritant.