Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Oral LD50 (OECD guideline 401), rat = 1800 mg/kg bw
Dermal LD50 (OECD guideline 402), rabbit > 2000 mg/kg bw (limit test)
Acute toxicity by inhalation was not tested according to REGULATION (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex VIII, Section 8.5, Column 2.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
Refer to the Analogue Approach Justification document provided in IUCLID Section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 500 - < 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: source CAS 85586-07-8, Kao, 1994
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: source CAS 68585-47-7, Huntsman, 1978
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
1 200 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: source CAS 151-21-3, BASF, 1983
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
1 230 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: source CAS 91783-23-2, Sasol, 1984
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
1 063 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: source CAS 91783-23-2, Sasol, 1984
Interpretation of results:
Category 4 based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
C12-14AS Zn is considered to be harmful if swallowed and has to be classified in Cat. 4 (H302) according to CLP.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
1 800 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
The whole data base is conclusive and of high quality.

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
01 June 2012 - 30 August 2012
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
According to the ECHA guidance document “Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)”, the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Justification for type of information:
Refer to the Analogue Approach Justification document provided in IUCLID Section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: source CAS 142-31-4, BASF, 2012a
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 500 mg/kg bw
Based on:
act. ingr.
Remarks:
highest dose tested
Remarks on result:
other: source CAS 68081-96-9, P&G, 1975a
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 500 mg/kg bw
Based on:
act. ingr.
Remarks:
highest dose tested
Remarks on result:
other: source CAS 68081-97-0, P&G, 1975b
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 500 mg/kg bw
Based on:
act. ingr.
Remarks:
highest dose tested
Remarks on result:
other: source CAS 91783-22-1, P&G, 1978
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
C12-14AS Zn is considered to be of low toxicity after acute dermal application and has not to be classified classified according to CLP
Executive summary:

Several studies are available from analogue group members (CAS 142 -31 -4, CAS 68081 -96 -9, CAS 68081 -97 -0, CAS 91783 -22 -1). The LD50 for acute dermal toxicity for C12 -14AS Zn was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw from these studies. As explained in the analogue approach justification, the differences between the target and the source substances are unlikely to lead to differences in the dermal LD50.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Quality of whole database:
The whole data base is conclusive and of high quality.

Additional information

There are no data on acute oral and dermal toxicity available for C12-14 AS Zn (CAS n.a.). Therefore these endpoints are covered by read-across to structurally related alkyl sulfates (AS), i.e. C12-14 AS Na (CAS 85586-07-8), C10-16 AS Na (CAS 68585-47-7), C12 AS Na (CAS 151-21-3) and C12-13 AS Na (CAS 91783-23-2) for acute oral toxicity and C10-16 AS NH4 (CAS 68081-96-9), C10-16 AS Mg (CAS 68081-97-0), C12-13 AS K (CAS 91783-22-1) and C8 AS Na (CAS 142-31-4) for the dermal route. The possibility of a read-across to other alkyl sulfates in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 Annex XI 1.5 “Grouping of substances and read-across approach” was assessed. In Annex XI 1.5 it is given that a read-across approach is possible for substances whose physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a regular pattern as a result of structural similarity. The AS reported within the AS analogues show structural similarity. The most important common structural feature of the members of the analogue approach is the presence of a predominantly linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain with a polar sulfate group, neutralized with a counter ion. This structural feature confers the surfactant properties of the alkyl sulfates. The surfactant property of the members of the AS analogues in turn represent the predominant attribute in mediating effects on mammalian health. Therefore, the AS of the AS analogue approach have similar physicochemical, environmental and toxicological properties, validating the read-across approach. The approach of grouping different AS for the evaluation of their effects on human health and the environment was also made by the OECD in the SIDS initial assessment profile [1] and by a voluntary industry program carrying out Human and Environmental Risk Assessments (HERA [2]), further supporting the read across approach between structurally related AS.

Zinc compounds are recognised as zinc category in the OECD HPV program [3]. The zinc category includes six compounds (zinc metal, zinc oxide, zinc distearate, zinc chloride, zinc sulphate, and trizinc bis(orthophosphate). Available data show that zinc metal, zinc oxide, zinc distearate, and zinc phosphate have a low acute toxicity, are not corrosive and irritating to the skin, eyes, or respiratory tract, and are not sensitizing to the skin. In contrast, zinc chloride is corrosive, irritating to the respiratory tract, and acutely toxic after inhalation and ingestion. Zinc sulphate is also acutely toxic after ingestion, as well as severely irritating to the eyes. These effects seems mainly related to the counter ion and not to the zinc cation. C12 -14AS Zn is classified as harmful if swallowed, skin irritating and corrosive to the eyes. Therefore, contribution of zinc to those endpoints is considered to be negligible when assessing human health effects of C12-14AS Zn. 

Acute oral toxicity

There are relevant studies for C12-14 AS Na (CAS 85586-07-8), C10-16 AS Na (CAS 68585-47-7), C12 AS Na (CAS 151-21-3) and C12-13 AS Na (CAS 91783-23-2) available.

The key study conducted with C12-14 AS Na (CAS 85586-07-8), was performed similar to OECD Guideline 420 on Wistar rats (Kao, 1994). Five Wistar rats of both sexes were dosed with the test substance at 500 and 2000 mg/kg bw via gavage. All males and one female of the top dose group died within 24 h after the application of the test substance. No clinical signs of toxicity were observed in animals of the low dose group. Clinical signs of toxicity at 2000 mg/kg comprised hunched back, decrease in motor activity, ataxia and pallor. In addition the males showed piloerection and the females hypotonia. Upon necropsy haemoperitoneum, congested mucous membranes of the gastro-intestinal tract, and bloody looking liquid inside these organs occurred in one of the males which died during the course of the study. One female of the 2000 mg/kg bw dose group showed dilation of the small intestines and caecum. No further findings were observed upon necropsy. The LD50 was greater than 500 but below 2000 mg/kg bw.

The study conducted with C10-16 AS Na (CAS 68585-47-7, analytical purity 85%) was performed similar to OECD Guideline 401 (Huntsman, 1978). Five Spraque-Dawley rats of each sex were dosed with the test substance at the limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw via gavage and observed for mortality and clinical signs for 14 days. One female died after application of the test substance. No clinical signs of toxicity were seen in any animal. The LD50 was determined to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw.

A further study was conducted with C12 AS Na (CAS 151-21-3, analytical purity 98%) similar to OECD Guideline 401 with acceptable restrictions on Wistar rats (BASF, 1983). Both sexes were dosed with the test substance via gavage. Mortalities occurred but no details were available. Clinical signs of toxicity comprised diarrhoea, spastic gait, decreased activity, lateral position, hunched posture, laboured respiration and coma. Necropsy of dead animals revealed haemorrhages in gastro-intestinal tract and vascular congestion in the liver. No findings were observed in animals sacrificed upon study termination. The LD50 was given as 1200 mg/kg bw for males and females, 977 mg/kg bw for females and 1427 mg/kg for males. 

A further study performed similar to OECD Guideline 401 was conducted with C12-13 AS Na (CAS 91783-23-2, analytical purity 26.8%). Five Wistar rats of each sex were dosed with the test substance at 880, 1040, 1260 and 1500 mg/kg bw via gavage and observed for mortalities for 14 days (Sasol, 1984). At the lowest dose no mortalities occurred. In the 1040, 1260 and 1500 mg/kg bw dose groups 0/5, 3/5 and 5/5 males and 2/5, 5/5 and 5/5 females died within 14 days. No data on clinical signs of toxicity are available. The LD50 was determined to be 1230 mg/kg bw for males and 1063 mg/kg bw for females.

In the following a fixed dose for the LD50-value is discussed. Looking at the acute oral toxicity of AS in rodents it can be seen that the toxicity decreases with increasing chain length (see Analogue Justification Report & HERA report). Evaluations of test materials comprising mixtures of chain lengths also showed a trend to lower toxicity as the proportion of longer chain lengths in the test material increases.

Using the OECD 420 fixed dose method no deaths at 500 mg/kg bw and 60% deaths at 2000 mg/kg bw occurred, resulting in a LD50 presumably greater than 1000 mg/kg bw for C12-14 AS Na (Kao, 1994). The LD50 for C12 AS in a study with 98% active ingredient was 1200 mg/kg bw (BASF, 1983) for males and females. The LD50 for C12-13 AS was in a comparable dose range (Sasol, 1984). Both substances are more toxic than C12-14 AS Na and hence represent a worst-case. Moreover, taking into account that the study with 85% active ingredient of C10-16 AS resulted in a LD50 of greater than 2000 mg/kg bw (Huntsman, 1978), the adjusted LD50 for C12-14 AS (100%) would be 1800 mg/kg bw.

Based on the results mentioned above, a LD50 of 1800 mg/kg bw is justified for C12-14 AS Zn (CAS n.a.). Therefore, the available data on acute oral toxicity meet the criteria for classification as Acute Tox Cat 4 (H302) according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.

 

Acute dermal toxicity

Regarding the acute dermal toxicity four studies are available for the read-across substances C10-16 AS NH4 (CAS 68081-96-9), C10-16 AS Mg (CAS 68081-97-0), C12-13 AS K (CAS 91783-22-1) and C8 AS Na (CAS 142-31-4).

The key study was conducted with C8 AS Na (CAS 142-31-4) according to OECD Guideline 402 (BASF, 2012). 5 Wistar rats per sex were treated with 2000 mg/kg bw under semi occlusive conditions for 24 h. No mortality occurred, no sign of systemic toxicity and of local irritation was observed.

The study conducted with C10-16 AS NH4 (CAS 68081-96-9) was performed as limit test conducted similar to OECD Guideline 402 with three male and three female New Zealand White rabbits (P&G, 1975a). The test substance (analytical purity 25.1%) was applied at 2000 mg/kg bw for 24 h under occlusive conditions. No mortalities occurred. Clinical signs of toxicity comprised severe erythema and slight eschar formation at 24 h, necrosis on Days 2–14 with sloughing of the skin on Days 8–14 and hyper-pigmentation of new skin by Day 14. No signs of systemic toxicity were observed. Hence, the LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw based on the test material and greater than 500 mg/kg bw based on active ingredient.

The study conducted with C10-16 AS Mg (CAS 68081-97-0) was performed as limit test conducted similar to OECD Guideline 402 with three male and three female New Zealand White rabbits (P&G, 1975b). The test substance (analytical purity 23.5%) was applied at 2000 mg/kg bw for 24 h under occlusive conditions. No mortalities occurred. Clinical signs of toxicity comprised severe erythema and eschar formation at 24 h, necrosis by Days 5–21 and necrotic tissues sloughed and leaving skin hyper-pigmented at Day 21. Hence, the LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw based on the test material and greater 500 mg/kg bw based on the active ingredient.

Another study similar to OECD Guideline 402 was performed with C12-13 AS K (CAS 91783-22-1) on three male and three female New Zealand White rabbits (P&G, 1978). Both sexes were dosed at 2000 mg/kg bw (analytical purity 25%) under occlusive conditions for 24 h. No mortalities occurred during the conduct of the study. Findings within this study comprised moderate to severe erythema, edema, and atonia, desquamation and fissuring by Day 6 and eschar formation and exfoliation. Based on the above mentioned findings the LD50 was greater than 2000 mg/kg bw based on test material and greater 500 mg/kg bw based on active ingredient.

Within the studies mentioned above no mortalities or signs of systemic toxicity occurred after dermal application of alkyl sulfates with varying carbon chain length. Taken into account the generally low toxicity after oral application and the low dermal absorption rate of alkyl sulfates (approx. 1%) this result was expected. In agreement, no classification for acute dermal toxicity is required.

 

Acute inhalation toxicity

No studies for acute inhalation toxicity are available. However, testing the potential of acute toxicity via inhalation route of C12-14 AS Zn (CAS n.a.) is considered to be not justified. According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex VIII, Section 8.5, Column 2, in addition to the oral route (8.5.1), for substances other than gases, the information mentioned under 8.5.2 to 8.5.3 shall be provided for at least one other route. As information under 8.5.3 (dermal route) is provided, the requirement is fulfilled by using the most appropriate route of exposure.

AS is mainly used in liquid media and due to its very low vapour pressure [2] inhalation is not viewed as a significant route of exposure. Inhalation of AS may occur by inhalation of aerosols generated by spray cleaners or by inhalation of detergent dusts (e.g. washing powder). Taken into account that the acute toxicity of AS is generally low no further information on acute toxicity is expected by testing for acute inhalation toxicity as the predominant effect will comprise of local irritant effects rather than systemic toxicity.

 

[1] SIDS initial assessment profile, (2007); http://www.aciscience.org/docs/Alkyl_Sulfates_Final_SIAP.pdf

[2] (HERA Draft report, 2002); http://www.heraproject.com/files/3-HH-04-%20HERA%20AS%20HH%20web%20wd.pdf

[3] SIDS initial assessment profile, (2005); http://webnet.oecd.org/Hpv/UI/handler.axd?id=fddec5fa-9727-413a-9d67-41c2154cd362

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available data on acute oral toxicity meet the criteria for classification as Acute Tox Cat 4 (H302) according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008. The available data on acute dermal toxicity do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification. As the neat substance has to be classified as harmful if swallowed the substance will also be classified as harmful if inhaled (H332: Acute tox 4 ) in case the substance is available as neat powder.