Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-186-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 July 2020 to 20 August 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
- Report date:
- 2021
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test using the Hprt and xprt genes)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Violet sodium polysulfide aluminosilicate with a SOD-type framework structure
- EC Number:
- 701-186-2
- Molecular formula:
- |Na+6-x+y+z (S2•-)y (S3•-)z (S4)t|[Al6-x Si6+x O24] – SOD Where: 6 ≤ 6-x+ y+z ≤ 8 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.2 0 < y+z +t ≤ 2 t > 0 SOD = Sodalite framework structure
- IUPAC Name:
- Violet sodium polysulfide aluminosilicate with a SOD-type framework structure
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- HPRT
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Type and source of cells: CHO AA8 cells, Batch No.5000062 procured from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)
- Suitability of cells: The CHO AA8 cells are one of the recommended test systems by regulatory agencies for conducting in vitro mammalian gene mutation test.
MEDIA USED
- Type and composition of media, CO2 concentration, humidity level, temperature, if applicable: Alpha Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) without ribonucleosides containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and antibiotics (1% Penicillin and streptomycin) were used. The pH of the culture medium was 7.32 to 7.33. The media was stored at 2 to 8ºC till use thawed to room temperature before use.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: liver of male Wistar rats.
- method of preparation of S9 mix: The S9 homogenate was prepared from male wistar rats induced with intraperitoneal injection of sodium phenobarbitone and β-naphthoflavone at 16 mg/mL and 20 mg/mL respectively for 3 days prior to sacrifice. The S9 homogenate was prepared and stored in the test facility at -80±10ºC until use. One mL of S9 homogenate was thawed immediately before use and mixed with 9 mL of co-factor solution containing 4 mM NADP, 5 mM Glucose-6-phosphate, 8 mM MgCl2 and 33 mM KCl in Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) of pH 7.32 and 7.33.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium:
1 mL, 10% (v/v) S9 mix and 0.1 mL, 1% (v/v) S9.
- quality controls of S9: Batch of S9 homogenate was assessed for sterility, protein content and for its ability to metabolize the promutagens 2-Aminoanthracene and Benzo(a)pyrene to mutagens using Salmonella typhimurium TA100 strain. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL.
The top dose was selected based on preliminary solubility and precipitation tests as well as an initial cytotoxicity test. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: based on the solubility results.
- Percentage of solvent in the final culture medium: 1% v/v.
Controls
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: 3 (cytotoxicity and cloning efficiency in non-selective medium) and 5 (cloning efficiency of mutant colonies in selective medium)
- Number of independent experiments: 1
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): approx. 2 x 10^6 cells/culture flask (Initial cytotoxicity test and Gene mutation test).
- Test substance added in medium.
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 3 hours and 2 minutes at 37±1ºC with 5±1% CO2.
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times): 7 days
FOR GENE MUTATION:
- Expression time (cells in growth medium between treatment and selection): 8 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selective agent): 8 days.
- Method used: monolayer cultures.
- Selective agent: 10 μM of 6-Thioguanine. Flasks were incubated at 37±1°C with 5±1% CO2 for 8 days.
- Number of cells seeded and method to enumerate numbers of viable and mutants cells: 200 x 3 per group (cytotoxicity and cloning efficiency in non-selective medium) and 4x10^5 x 5 per group (cloning efficiency of mutant colonies in selective medium). Flasks were incubated at 37±1°C with 5±1% CO2 for 8 days. Post incubation period, medium from each dish was aspirated and stained with 5% Giemsa stain, number of colonies formed were counted manually.
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative survival (RS)
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: An initial cytotoxicity test was carried out at five different concentrations (0.03125, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL of the test item). Cytotoxicity was assessed by determining the Adjusted Cloning Efficiency and Relative Survival according to formulas included in annex 2 of OECD TG 476. - Rationale for test conditions:
- In preliminary solubility and precipitation tests, heavy precipitations were observed at 1 and 2 mg/mL while only slight precipitation was observed at 0.5 mg/mL which was selected as highest dose in the initial cytotoxicity test. At 0.5 mg/mL, the Relative Survival was greater than 10%. Therefore 0.5 mg/mL was selected as the highest concentration for testing in the gene mutation test.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test chemical is considered to be clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:
1) At least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control.
2) The increase is concentration-related when evaluated with an appropriate trend test.
3) Any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical negative/vehicle control data.
When all of these criteria are met, the test chemical is then considered able to induce gene mutations in cultured mammalian cells in this test system.
A test chemical is considered clearly negative if, in all experimental conditions examined:
1) None of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control.
2) There is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend test.
3) All results are inside the distribution of the historical negative/vehicle control data.
The test chemical is then considered unable to induce gene mutations in cultured mammalian cells in this test system. - Statistics:
- Data of mutant frequencies were analyzed for differences among vehicle control, treatment and positive control groups by performing power transformation procedure by Snee and Irr (1981) with which, the observed mutant frequency was transformed using the formula: Y=(X+A)eB, where Y = transformed mutant frequency, X = observed mutant frequency and A, B = constants (viz. A = 1 and B = 0.15). Statistical analysis of the experimental data was carried out using SPSS Statistical package version 22.0.
The statistical significances are designated by the superscripts as given below:
* Statistically significant (p<0.05) change than the vehicle control group.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Remarks:
- CHO AA8 Cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Data on pH: No change in pH was observed in any of the test concentrations.
- Possibility of evaporation from medium: no
- Precipitation and time of the determination: slight precipitation was observed at 0.5 mg/mL, heavy precipitation was observed at 1 and 2 mg/mL.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES (if applicable):
In the initial cytotoxicity test, there was no evidence of excessive cytotoxicity (˂10% RS) up to 0.5 mg/mL in both presence of metabolic activation and absence of metabolic activation when compared to vehicle control. In the presence of metabolic activation, the RS values ranged from 50.41 % to 90.08 % and in the absence of metabolic activation, the RS values ranged from 52.54 % to 90.68 % at the concentrations of 0.03125, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 mg/mL.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data: mutant frequencies of 22.58 and 24.73 per 2×10^6 cells were observed in the vehicle control, with and without metabolic activation, respectively. Positive controls Benzo (a) pyrene and 4-Nitroquinoline N-oxide gave mutant frequencies of 268.13 and 264.13 per 2×10^6 cells, respectively.
Gene mutation tests in mammalian cells:
- Results from cytotoxicity measurements:
o Relative survival (RS): There was no evidence of excessive cytotoxicity (˂10% RS) at any of the concentrations both in presence and absence of metabolic activation. In the presence of metabolic activation, the RS values ranged from 50.43 to 84.35 % and in the absence of metabolic activation the RS values ranged from 51.72 to 83.62 % respectively.
- Genotoxicity results:
The test item, resulted in mutant frequencies of 22.99 to 23.60 per 2×10^6 cells in the presence of metabolic activation and mutant frequencies of 25.00 to 25.29 per 2×10^6 cells in the absence of metabolic activation.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation, and 95% control limits for the distribution as well as the number of data)
- Positive historical control data: see Table 7
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: see Table 7
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Summary of initial cytotoxicity test.
Set No. | Treatment | Concentration (mg/mL) | Average Colony Count ± SD | Cloning Efficiency (CE) | Adjusted Cloning Efficiency (ACE) | Relative Survival (RS) (%) |
Set 1 +S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 187.33±5.13 | 0.94 | 1.21 | - |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007 | 0.03125 | 182.67±3.06 | 0.91 | 1.09 | 90.08 | |
0.0625 | 183.00±3.61 | 0.92 | 1.03 | 85.12 | ||
0.125 | 181.33±3.79 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 78.51 | ||
0.25 | 169.33±4.73 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 65.29 | ||
0.5 | 153.67±5.69 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 50.41 | ||
Set 2 -S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 185.33±5.51 | 0.93 | 1.18 | - |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007 | 0.03125 | 179.00±3.00 | 0.90 | 1.07 | 90.68 | |
0.0625 | 175.00±5.57 | 0.88 | 1.01 | 85.59 | ||
0.125 | 171.33±3.21 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 77.12 | ||
0.25 | 165.67±8.33 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 67.80 | ||
0.5 | 156.00±7.94 | 0.78 | 0.62 | 52.54 |
+S9: with metabolic activation; -S9: without metabolic activation;
*Note: Cloning Efficiency = 200 cells plated for each replicate.
Adjusted CE = CE × Number of cells at the end of treatment/number of cells at the beginning of treatment.
RS = Adjusted CE in treated culture/Adjusted CE in the vehicle control × 100.
CE = Number of colonies/Number of cells plated.
Table 2. Summary of parallel cytotoxicity test-gene mutation test.
Set No. | Treatment | Concentration (mg/mL) | Average Colony Count ± SD | Cloning Efficiency (CE) | Adjusted Cloning Efficiency (ACE) | Relative Survival (RS) (%) |
Set 1 +S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 186.00±6.93 | 0.93 | 1.15 | - |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007 | 0.0625 | 174.00±4.00 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 84.35 | |
0.125 | 165.67±8.50 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 73.04 | ||
0.25 | 165.67±4.93 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 64.35 | ||
0.5 | 155.33±6.11 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 50.43 | ||
Benzo(a)pyrene (Positive Control) | 3 μg/mL | 177.33±3.06 | 0.89 | 1.05 | 91.30 | |
Set 2 -S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 187.00±3.61 | 0.94 | 1.16 | - |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007 | 0.0625 | 178.33±4.04 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 83.62 | |
0.125 | 168.00±10.58 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 75.86 | ||
0.25 | 168.00±5.29 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 63.79 | ||
0.5 | 155.67±4.51 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 51.72 | ||
4 Nitroquinoline N-oxide (Positive Control) | 1 μg/mL | 182.00±9.85 | 0.91 | 1.07 | 92.24 |
+S9: with metabolic activation; -S9: without metabolic activation;
*Note: Cloning Efficiency = 200 cells plated for each replicate.
RS = Adjusted CE in treated culture/Adjusted CE in the vehicle control × 100.
CE = Number of colonies/Number of cells plated.
Adjusted CE = CE × Number of cells at the end of treatment/number of cells at the beginning of treatment.
Table 3. Summary of gene mutation test.
Set No. | Treatment | Concentration (mg/mL) | *Average Colony Count ± SD | Cloning Efficiency in selective media | Cloning Efficiency in non-selective media | Total number of mutant colonies / 2x106 cells | Mutant Frequency/ 2x106 cells |
Set 1 +S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 186.67±1.15 | 0.0000105 | 0.93 | 21 | 22.58 |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007 | 0.0625 | 182.00±2.00 | 0.0000105 | 0.91 | 21 | 23.08 | |
0.125 | 174.67±4.16 | 0.0000100 | 0.87 | 20 | 22.99 | ||
0.25 | 177.67±2.52 | 0.0000105 | 0.89 | 21 | 23.60 | ||
0.5 | 171.00±3.61 | 0.0000100 | 0.86 | 20 | 23.26 | ||
Benzo(a)pyrene (Positive Control) | 3 μg/mL | 182.67±7.57 | 0.0001220 | 0.91 | 244 | 268.13** | |
Set 2 -S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 186.00±4.58 | 0.0000115 | 0.93 | 23 | 24.73 |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007 | 0.0625 | 181.33±4.16 | 0.0000115 | 0.91 | 23 | 25.27 | |
0.125 | 175.00±5.00 | 0.0000110 | 0.88 | 22 | 25.00 | ||
0.25 | 175.67±5.09 | 0.0000110 | 0.88 | 22 | 25.00 | ||
0.5 | 174.67±7.57 | 0.0000110 | 0.87 | 22 | 25.29 | ||
4 Nitroquinoline N-oxide (Positive Control) | 1 μg/mL | 183.33±5.86 | 0.0000115 | 0.92 | 243 | 264.13** |
+S9: with metabolic activation; -S9: without metabolic activation; *Note: Cloning efficiency = 200 cells plated for each replicate.
**: Statistically significant (p˂0.05).
Mutant Frequency = Cloning efficiency of mutant colonies in selective medium/Cloning efficiency in non- selective medium.
Table 4. Individual data of initial cytotoxicity test.
Set No. | Treatment | Concentration (mg/mL) | Replicate | No. of Colonies/200 Cells | ||
R1 | R2 | R3 | ||||
Set 1 +S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 3 | 193 | 186 | 183 |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007
| 0.03125 | 3 | 180 | 186 | 182 | |
0.0625 | 3 | 184 | 186 | 179 | ||
0.125 | 3 | 177 | 184 | 183 | ||
0.25 | 3 | 173 | 164 | 171 | ||
0.5 | 3 | 149 | 152 | 160 | ||
Set 2 -S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 3 | 191 | 180 | 185 |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007
| 0.03125 | 3 | 182 | 179 | 176 | |
0.0625 | 3 | 176 | 180 | 169 | ||
0.125 | 3 | 175 | 169 | 170 | ||
0.25 | 3 | 159 | 163 | 175 | ||
0.5 | 3 | 159 | 162 | 147 |
Set No. | Treatment | Concentration (mg/mL) | Cell count (×106) | ||
Set 1 +S9 | End of Treatment | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | 27.60 | ||
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007
| 0.03125 | 25.80 | |||
0.0625 | 24.00 | ||||
0.125 | 22.50 | ||||
0.25 | 20.10 | ||||
0.5 | 16.95 | ||||
Set 2 -S9 | End of Treatment | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | 27.30 | ||
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007
| 0.03125 | 25.50 | |||
0.0625 | 24.60 | ||||
0.125 | 22.65 | ||||
0.25 | 20.70 | ||||
0.5 | 17.10 | ||||
Beginning of the Treatment | 21.50 |
Table 5. Individual data of parallel cytotoxicity test.
Set No. | Treatment | Concentration (mg/mL) | Replicate | No. of Colonies/200 Cells | ||
R1 | R2 | R3 | ||||
Set 1 +S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 3 | 190 | 190 | 178 |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007
| 0.0625 | 3 | 170 | 174 | 178 | |
0.125 | 3 | 169 | 172 | 156 | ||
0.25 | 3 | 160 | 168 | 169 | ||
0.5 | 3 | 154 | 150 | 162 | ||
Benzo(a)pyrene (Positive Control) | 3 µg/mL | 3 | 180 | 178 | 174 | |
Set 2 -S9 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 3 | 190 | 188 | 183 |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007
| 0.0625 | 3 | 179 | 182 | 174 | |
0.125 | 3 | 176 | 172 | 156 | ||
0.25 | 3 | 170 | 162 | 172 | ||
0.5 | 3 | 151 | 156 | 160 | ||
4 Nitroquinoline N-oxide (Positive Control) | 1 µg/mL | 3 | 190 | 185 | 171 |
Set No. | Treatment | Concentration (mg/mL) | Cell Count (×106) | |
Set 1 +S9 | End of Treatment | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | 27.30 | |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007
| 0.0625 | 24.45 | ||
0.125 | 22.35 | |||
0.25 | 19.65 | |||
0.5 | 16.35 | |||
Positive Control Benzo(a)pyrene (3 µg/mL) | 25.95 | |||
Set 2 -S9 | End of Treatment | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | 27.15 | |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007
| 0.0625 | 24.00 | ||
0.125 | 22.95 | |||
0.25 | 19.50 | |||
0.5 | 16.80 | |||
Positive Control 4 Nitroquinoline N-oxide (1 µg/mL) | 25.80 | |||
Beginning of the Treatment | 22.00 |
Table 6. Individual data of mutant phenotype
Set No. | Treatment | Concentration (mg/mL) | No. of Colonies/200 Cells | No. of Mutant Colonies/2×106Cells | ||||||
Replicate 1 | Replicate 2 | Replicate 3 | Replicate 1 | Replicate 2 | Replicate 3 | Replicate 4 | Replicate 5 | |||
Set 1 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 186 | 188 | 186 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007 | 0.0625 | 180 | 184 | 182 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 3 | |
0.125 | 176 | 170 | 178 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | ||
0.25 | 180 | 178 | 175 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 2 | ||
0.5 | 175 | 170 | 168 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 5 | ||
Benzo(a) pyrene (Positive Control) | 3 µg/mL | 188 | 186 | 174 | 43 | 48 | 52 | 55 | 46 | |
Set 2 | Vehicle Control (DMSO) | - | 185 | 191 | 182 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
Ultramarine Violet Pigment Violet 15 CI 77007 | 0.0625 | 178 | 186 | 180 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 4 | |
0.125 | 180 | 170 | 175 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 3 | ||
0.25 | 176 | 179 | 175 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | ||
0.5 | 180 | 178 | 166 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 5 | ||
4 Nitroquinoline N-oxide (Positive Control) | 1 µg/mL | 190 | 179 | 181 | 52 | 47 | 43 | 49 | 52 |
Note: For cloning efficiency 200 cells were plated for each replicate and the No. of Mutant Colonies mentioned in the table is obtained from 2 x106 cells (that is from 5 replicates).
Table 7. Historical data.
Vehicle-DMSO | With Metabolic Activation (3 to 6 hours) | Without Metabolic Activation (3 to 6 hours) |
Mean Data of Mutant Frequency/2x106 Cells | 24.51 | 25.43 |
Standard Deviation | 2.81 | 1.89 |
Margin of Error | 1.95 | 1.31 |
Upper bound | 26.46 | 26.74 |
Lower bound | 22.56 | 24.12 |
Positive Control- Benzo(a)pyrene and 4- Nitroquinoline N-oxide | With Metabolic Activation (3 to 6 hours) [Benzo(a)pyrene] | Without Metabolic Activation (3 to 6 hours)[4 Nitroquinoline N-oxide] |
Mean Data of Mutant Frequency/2x106 Cells | 261.94 | 264.60 |
Standard Deviation | 27.28 | 18.52 |
Margin of Error | 17.82 | 12.10 |
Upper bound | 279.76 | 276.70 |
Lower bound | 244.12 | 252.50 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In an in vitro HPRT gene mutation test using CHO AA8 cells, the test item is considered as non-mutagenic up to the concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, both in presence and absence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
A gene mutation study at HPRT gene using CHO AA8 cells was performed for the test item, with and without metabolic activation (±S9), according to OECD 476 Guideline (GLP study). Based on the results of the solubility, pH and precipitation tests, the test item was formulated in DMSO as vehicle and 0.5 mg/mL was selected as the highest concentration in an initial cytotoxicity test. This test was conducted at concentrations of 0.03125, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL. There was no evidence of excessive cytotoxicity (˂10% RS) at and up to 0.5 mg/mL in both presence and absence of metabolic activation when compared to vehicle control. Therefore, 0.5 mg/mL was selected as the highest concentration in the gene mutation test. The main test was conducted at the concentrations of 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL with an exposure time of 3 h and 2 min both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation and 6-Thioguanine as the selective agent. DMSO alone was tested as solvent control and Benzo(a) pyrene and 4 Nitroquinoline N-oxide were used as positive controls. Parallel cytotoxicity was assessed by determining the Adjusted Cloning Efficiency and Relative Survival. There was no statistically significant increase in number of mutant colonies at any of the concentrations tested when compared with the vehicle control. All results were inside the distribution of the historical vehicle control data. Positive controls resulted in mutant frequencies, which were statistically significant when compared with the vehicle control and within the historical positive control data. Based on these results, the test item is considered as non-mutagenic up to the concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation under the tested conditions.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.