Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-245-8 | CAS number: 70750-57-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
The test material Terpenes and terpenoids, turpentine oil, alpha-pinene fraction, oligomers CAS No. 70750-57-1, when administered daily by oral gavage to pregnant Hannover Wistar rats from gestation days GD 6 to 19, was not associated with any adverse systemic effect at dose levels up to and including 1000 mg/kg bw/day when compared to the control value. There were no toxicologically significant differences, or test item related-changes
in the reproductive parameters examined in the conditions of this study. No foetal effects were seen at external, visceral and/or skeletal examination of foetuses in the study which could be clearly related to the test item administration. Based on the result of this study, NOAEL for maternal toxicity, embryotoxicity, foetotoxicity, teratogenecity were established at 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 29 September 2015 - 29 October 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study performed according to OECD Guideline and under GLP conditions. Fully adequate for assessment.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Hannover Wistar rats (Crl:WI(Han))
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH, Sandhofer Weg 7, D97633, from SPF colony
- Age at study initiation: Young adult female rats, nulliparous and non-pregnant, at least 11 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 182-232 g
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Standard laboratory conditions during the study
- Diet and Water: The animals were provided with ssniff ® SM R/M-Z+H “Autoclavable Complete Feed for Rats and Mice – Breeding and Maintenance” (ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, D59494 Soest Germany) and tap water as for human consumption, ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.4-24.9ºC (range: 22 ± 3 °C)
- Humidity (%): 36-69 (range: 30 - 70 %)
- Air changes (per hr): 15-20 air exchanges/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours daily, from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.
STUDY SCHEDULE
Start of experiment : 29 September 2015 (first mating, when the females were at
least 11 weeks old)
Start of treatment : 05 October 2015 (first Gestation Day GD6)
End of treatment : 27 October 2015 (last Gestation Day GD19)
End of experiment : 28 October 2015 (last necropsy day) - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): A constant volume of 3 mL/kg body weight was administered to all dose groups, including the controls. The individual volume of the treatment was based on the most recent individual body weight of the animals.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Corn oil was selected based on the formulation and analytical trials in agreement with the Sponsor.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 3 mL/kg body weight
- Lot/batch no. (if required): MKBQ9948V
- Manufacturer: Sigma-Aldrich Co.
- Expiry/Retest Date: 31 January 2016
- Storage: Room temperature - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- -The test item was formulated in the vehicle, corn oil at the appropriate concentrations according to the dose level and volume selected, in the Pharmacy of CiToxLAB Hungary Ltd.
- Formulations were prepared daily, fresh prior to administration to animals.
- Duplicate samples were taken from test item formulations (from the top, middle and bottom of the container) once during the first week of treatment. - Details on mating procedure:
- - Oestrus cycle examination: shortly before start of pairing
- Pairing: After acclimatisation the females were paired according to their oestrus cycle with males in the morning for approximately 2 hours (1 male: 1 female) until at least 24 sperm positive females/group are attained.
- Proof of pregnancy: After the daily mating period, a vaginal smear was prepared and stained with 1% aqueous methylene blue solution. The smear was examined with a light microscope; the presence of a vaginal plug or sperm in the vaginal smear was considered as evidence of copulation (GD0). Sperm positive females were separated and caged individually. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Start of treatment : 05 October 2015 (first Gestation Day GD6)
End of treatment : 27 October 2015 (last Gestation Day GD19) - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- 29 September 2015 (first mating, when the females were at least 11 weeks old)
Start of treatment : 05 October 2015 (first Gestation Day GD6)
End of treatment : 27 October 2015 (last Gestation Day GD19)
End of experiment : 28 October 2015 (last necropsy day) - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
nominal conc.
Control - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
nominal conc.
Low dose - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
300 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
nominal conc.
Mid dose - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
nominal conc.
High dose - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Details on study design:
- Dose selection rational: In the DRF study doses of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were administered by oral gavage to pregnant rats from GD6 to GD19. In the DRF study, 6 animals were examined in the control, 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day dose groups, while 8 animals were examined in the 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose group. No maternal and/or foetal toxicity was detected at dose levels up to and including 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Based on the above results, doses of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were selected for the main study.
Rational administration route: The oral route is a possible route of exposure to the test item in humans and is considered suitable to provide the systemic exposure required on this developmental toxicology study. - Maternal examinations:
- Clinical observations and mortality
- Morbidity and mortality: twice daily (at the beginning and end of each working day).
- Cage-side clinical observations: daily
- Detailed clinical observations: onset of treatment (GD6) then weekly.
- pertinent behavioural changes and signs of toxicity including mortality, changes in skin, fur, eyes, mucous membranes, occurrence of secretions and excretions, and autonomic activity (e.g. lachrymation, piloerection, pupil size, unusual respiratory pattern), changes in gait,
posture and response to handling as well as the presence of clonic or tonic movements, stereotypies (e.g. excessive grooming, repetitive circling), bizarre behaviour (e.g. selfmutilation, walking backwards), tremors, convulsions, salivation, diarrhoea, lethargy, sleep and coma.
- On GD13 and/or 14, the sperm positive females were examined for the presence of vaginal bleeding or “placental sign” (intrauterine extravasation of blood as an early sign of pregnancy in rat, which is considered to confirm implantation).
Body weight measurement
- The body weight of each animal was recorded on GD0, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20
Food consumption measurement
- Food was measured on GD0, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20. Food consumption was calculated for each interval, including GD6-20 and GD0-20.
Pathology
Caesarean section and necropsy
- Visceral examination: observation for structural abnormalities or pathological changes
Histopathology
Microscopic examination of three heads was performed to provide additional information for reporting. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- - Ovaries and uterus examinations
- Cervix weight
- Early and late embryonic or foetal deaths, number of corpora lutea in each ovary
- Implantation sites in each uterine horn, the number of live foetuses, early and late embryonic death and foetal death, the number and percent of pre- and post-implantation losses
- Degree of resorption
- Placentas examinations (macroscopical examination) - Fetal examinations:
- - Number of live foetuses
- Foetus weight (accuracy 0.01 g)
- External examination of the foetuses
- Examination of the great arteries
- The gender of foetuses was determined according to the anogenital distance.
For the foetuses subjected to skeletal examination, the abdominal region was opened and the viscera and skin of foetuses were removed and the cadaver and examined by means of a dissecting microscope. - Statistics:
- Maternal Data:
- Clinical signs (by gestation day)
- Body weight and body weight gain: mean ± SD
- Corrected body weight on GD20 (body weight-gravid uterine weight) and corrected body weight gain: mean ± SD
- Food consumption: mean ± SD
- Pathology findings
- Gravid uterine weight
Caesarean Section and Necropsy Data:
- Number of corpora lutea: mean ± SD
- Number of implantations: mean ± SD
- Number and percent of live foetuses: mean ± SD
- Number and percent of intrauterine mortality: mean ± SD - Indices:
- - Pre-implantation loss: %, group mean
- Post-implantation loss: %, group mean
Foetal Data:
- Sex distribution: %, group mean
- Foetal body weight (accuracy 0.01 g): mean ± S.D.
- External abnormalities/litter: %, group mean - Historical control data:
- Control group, as well as with the relevant historical control data were included in all statistical calculations.
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
No maternal toxicity was observed - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
No embryotoxicity and/or teratogenicity was observed - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: embryotoxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: fetotoxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study, the following no-observed-adverse-effect levels were derived: NOAEL maternal toxicity: 1000 mg/kg bw/day NOAEL embryotoxicity: 1000 mg/kg bw/day NOAEL foetotoxicity: 1000 mg/kg bw/day NOAEL teratogenecity: 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
The aim the study was to assess the effects of the test item Terpenes and terpenoids, turpentine oil, alpha-pinene fraction, oligomers CAS No. 70750-57-1 on the embryonic and foetal development (including the organogenesis period) of Hannover Wistar rats in their first pregnancy.
The dams (one control and three test item treated groups) were treated daily by oral (gavage) administration, at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
There was no unscheduled mortality or treatment related clinical signs in the study. No test item related effect was observed on body weight, body weight gain, corrected terminal body weight, corrected body weight gain / corrected net body weight gain or animal food consumption during the study. There were no toxicologically significant differences, or test item related-changes in the reproductive parameters examined in the conditions of this study. The number of corpora lutea, implantation sites and pre-implantation loss mean values were comparable in the Control or test item treated groups at all of the dose levels tested.
There were no effects considered related to test item administration on the early and late embryonic loss, post-implantation (total resorption, including the early and late embryonic loss) or total intrauterine mortality in the test item-treated dams evaluated. No remarkable internal or external observations were recorded for any pregnant animals during necropsy. The mean number of viable foetuses in all test item treated groups was comparable with the control mean. The sex distribution of foetuses did not differ significantly between the control and treatment groups both for mean and absolute numbers. There were no toxicologically significant differences in the placenta of the test item treated groups. The litter mean and group mean weights of foetuses in the Low, Mid and High dose groups did not differ significantly from the control mean. The number of body weight retarded foetuses (with a weight of < the concurrent control mean -2SD) in the Mid dose group was statistically higher than in the Control group, although the incidence of body weight retarded foetuses was similar in the Control, Low and High dose groups. All abnormalities observed at external, visceral or skeletal examination in this study were considered as incidental findings since they occurred at a incidence similar to the concurrent study control data, within the historical control (HC) incidence range, or were considered to be spontaneous events unrelated to treatment.
Based on the results of this study, the following no-observed-adverse-effect levels were derived: NOAEL maternal toxicity: 1000 mg/kg bw/day NOAEL embryotoxicity: 1000 mg/kg bw/day NOAEL foetotoxicity: 1000 mg/kg bw/day NOAEL teratogenecity: 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Reference
DOSE FORMULATION ANALYSIS
Test item content of the dosing formulations was determined twice during the treatment period. All formulations were found to be in the range of 94-104% of nominal concentrations (33.3, 100 and 333 mg/mL) and were homogenous. Formulations had been shown to have good stability.
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
No test item related mortality and clinical signs occurred during the study at all dose levels.
MATERNAL BODY WEIGHT AND BODY WEIGHT GAIN
No toxicologically significant changes, adverse effects or effects considered related to test item administration were observed in the mean body weights or body weight gain values of the test item-treated evaluated dams when compared to control.
MATERNAL FOOD CONSUMPTION
There were no adverse, toxicologically significant effects considered related to test item administration, or relevant differences to the historical data available in the mean daily food consumption of the pregnant rats at any of the dose levels tested. No adverse effects were noted on the mean food consumption values of the evaluated animals in the test item treated groups when compared to control animals following daily administration to pregnant damns from GD6 to 20, at dose levels of up to and including 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
NECROPSY FINDINGS OF THE DAMS
No remarkable internal or external observations were recorded for any pregnant animals.
CAESAREAN SECTION AND PREGNANCY DATA
Pregnancy data
Ninety six females (24 in each group) were mated in the study. The number of confirmed pregnant, evaluated dams was 23, 24, 23 and 22 in the Control, Low, Mid and High dose groups, respectively
Intrauterine mortality, corpora lutea and implantation sites
The mean number of corpora lutea and the mean number of implantation sites were comparable with the controls in all treated groups. No adverse effect was observed in pre-implantation loss of the test item treated groups when compared to the control. The early and the late embryonic loss did not differ significantly from the control in the test item treated groups. There was no significant difference in the post-implantation loss between the test item treated and control groups. The total intrauterine mortality was comparable with the control, although there was one animal in the High dose group with 100% total intrauterine mortality. There was no statistically significant difference in foetal death compared to the control.
Viable foetuses and their sex distribution
The mean number of viable foetuses was comparable with the control mean. There was no toxicologically significant difference in the sex distribution of foetuses between the control and treatment groups.
Evaluation of placentae
There were no toxicological significant differences in the external morphology of placenta at evaluation of the treated groups compared to controls.
The weight of foetuses in the Low, Mid and High (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively) did not differ significantly from the control mean value, when evaluated by both litter mean and group mean.
EVALUATION OF THE FOETUSES
The total number of retarded foetuses (with a weight of < the concurrent control mean- 2SD) in the Mid dose group was statistically higher than in the Control group. However, there was no clear dose-response as the incidence of body weight retarded foetuses was similar in the Control, Low and High dose groups. The number of affected litters were comparable between all groups, the difference was caused by two litters containing 100% and 50% body weight retarded foetuses in the Mid dose group. This statistical difference was not considered to be related to test item, rather an incidental finding.
Foetal External Abnormalities and visceral examination:
In summary, all abnormalities observed at visceral examination in this study were considered as incidental findings; they corresponded with the concurrent study control data, with historical control (HC) data or were considered to be spontaneous events unrelated to treatment.
Skeletal examination:
All of the skeletal findings above occurred at an incidence within the current historical control (HC) range or the concurrent study control data, thus they were considered as incidental.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Study performed according to OECD Guideline and under GLP conditions. Fully adequate for assessment.
Additional information
A pre-natale developmental toxicity study OECD 414 was performed with the test tem Terpenes and terpenoids, turpentine oil, alpha-pinene fraction, oligomers CAS No. 70750-57-1. The aim of the test was to assess the effect of the test material on the embryonic and foetal development (including the organogenesis period) of Hannover Wistar rats in their first pregnancy.
The dams (one control and three test item treated groups) were treated daily by oral (gavage) administration, at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
There was no unscheduled mortality or treatment related clinical signs in the study. No test item related effect was observed on body weight, body weight gain, corrected terminal body weight, corrected body weight gain / corrected net body weight gain or animal food consumption during the study. There were no toxicologically significant differences, or test item related-changes in the reproductive parameters examined in the conditions of this study. The number of corpora lutea, implantation sites and pre-implantation loss mean values were comparable in the Control or test item treated groups at all of the dose levels tested.
There were no effects considered related to test item administration on the early and late embryonic loss, post-implantation (total resorption, including the early and late embryonic loss) or total intrauterine mortality in the test item-treated dams evaluated. No remarkable internal or external observations were recorded for any pregnant animals during necropsy. The mean number of viable foetuses in all test item treated groups was comparable with the control mean. The sex distribution of foetuses did not differ significantly between the control and treatment groups both for mean and absolute numbers. There were no toxicologically significant differences in the placenta of the test item treated groups. The litter mean and group mean weights of foetuses in the Low, Mid and High dose groups did not differ significantly from the control mean. The number of body weight retarded foetuses (with a weight of < the concurrent control mean -2SD) in the Mid dose group was statistically higher than in the Control group, although the incidence of body weight retarded foetuses was similar in the Control, Low and High dose groups. All abnormalities observed at external, visceral or skeletal examination in this study were considered as incidental findings since they occurred at a incidence similar to the concurrent study control data, within the historical control (HC) incidence range, or were considered to be spontaneous events unrelated to treatment.
Based on the results of this study, the no-observed-adverse-effect levels NOAEL for maternal toxicity, embryotoxicity, foetotoxicity and teratogenecity were established at 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route:
Study performed according to OECD Guideline and under GLP conditions. Fully adequate for assessment.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Not classified for reproductive or developmental toxicity according to EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 or UN Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.