Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
22 January 2002 - 31 January 2002
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
442-480-8
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
182893-11-4
Molecular formula:
Mixture of C5H12O4 and C10H22O6
IUPAC Name:
reaction mass of 1,2-dimethylpropylidene dihydroperoxide and dimethyl 1,2-benzenedicarboxylate
Details on test material:
Identification: Trigonox R-938
Chemical name: Methyl Isopropyl Ketone Peroxide
CASRN: Mixture of 13921-99-8, 33372-83-7, 131-11-3 and 563-80-4
Description: Clear colourless liquid
Batch: 1510-14
Test substance storage: In refrigerator in the dark
Stability under storage conditions: Stable
Expiry date: 01 January 2003

Method

Target gene:
histidine + typtophan operon
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: see below
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: see below
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
1st experiment:
all strains: 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of 5% (v/v) S9-mix.
2nd experiment:
TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100
With and without S9-mix: 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/plate
WP2uvrA
Without S9-mix: 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000 and 2000 µg/plate.
With S9-mix : 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: no data
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: see below
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Preincubation period: NA
- Exposure duration: 48 hours

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine/tryptophan

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: At least five different doses (increasing with approximately half-log steps) of the test substance were tested in triplicate in each strain.

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: The revertant colonies (histidine independentc c.q. tryptophan independent) were counted automatically with a Protos model 50000 colony counter or manually, if less than 40 colonies per plate were present.

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: reduction of the bacterial background lawn
Evaluation criteria:
No formal hypothesis testing was done.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in any tester strain at any concentration is not greater than two times the solvent control value, with or without metabolic activation.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.

A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a) It induces at least a 2-fold, dose related increase in the number of revertants with respect to the number induced by the solvent control in any of the tester strains, either with or without metabolic activation.
However, any mean plate count of less than 20 is considered to be not significant.
b) The positive response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.

The preceding criteria were not absolute and other modifying factors might enter into the final evaluation decision
Statistics:
None

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Remarks:
see results table
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
see results table
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Remarks:
see results table
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
see results table
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS: Not examined

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: Combined with first experiment

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Yes

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: None

Any other information on results incl. tables

In the second experiment in tester strain TA1537, MIPKP induced an up to 2.5-fold increase in the absence of S9-mix. However, this increase was only observed in one experiment and the highest number of revertants was not higher than 20 and within our historical control data range. Therefore, this increase is considered to be not biologically relevant and the test substance is considered to be not mutagenic. All other bacterial strains showed negative responses over the entire dose range, i.e. no dose related, two-fold, increase in the number of revertants in two independently repeated experiments.

The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within our laboratory background historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

Based on the results of this study it is concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Executive summary:

The substance was tested in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay with four histidine-requiring strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA100 and TA98) and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay with a tryptophan-requiring strain of Escherichia coli WP2uvrA. The test was performed in two independent experiments in the presence and absence of S9-mix (Aroclor-1254 induced rat liver S9-mix).

In the combined range finding test/first mutation assay, MIKP was tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix. MIPK did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. Toxicity was observed in all tester strains. In the second mutation assay, it was tested up to concentrations of 1000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix in the strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100. TRIGONOX R-938 was tested up to concentrations of 2000 and 1000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively in strain WP2uvrA. Toxicity was observed in all tester strains. The presence of 5 and 10% (v/v) liver microsomal activation did not influence these findings.

In the second experiment in tester strain TA1537, MIKP induced an up to 2.5-fold increase in the absence of S9-mix. However, this increase was only observed in one experiment and the highest number of revertants was not higher than 20 and within our historical control data range. Therefore, this increase is considered to be not biologically relevant and the test substance is considered to be not mutagenic.

All other bacterial strains showed negative responses over the entire dose range, i.e. no doserelated, two-fold, increase in the number of revertants in two independently repeated experiments.

The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within our laboratory background historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.

Based on the results of this study it is concluded that MIPKP is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.