Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Ames test (OECD 471): negative with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium TA 1535, 1537, 98 and 100, and E. coli WP2 uvr A

Chromosome aberration (OECD 473, read-across): negative in primary human peripheral lymphocytes with and without metabolic activation

Gene mutation in mammalian cells (OECD 476, read-across): negative in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells with and without metabolic activation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
24 - 26 Jul 1985 and 13 - 18 Aug 1985 (First and second test series)
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
no E.coli or TA102 strain tested, lack of information on test substance
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1983
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1997
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no E.coli or TA102 tested, no test substance purity reported, no historical control data, only one positive control (2-AA) with S9
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
Histidine operon
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Remarks:
and TA1538
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
0.5 mL of frozen bacteria was thawed in 20 mL standard nutrient broth, mixed and incubated for 10h by shaking at 37 degree Celsius. Cell titre was approx. 10e9.

MEDIA
Nutrient broth: standard (Merck)
Top agar: 9 g Bacto Agar (Difco) and 5 g NaCl (Merck) was dissolved in 1000 mL water and autoclaved.
Petri dishes: 30 mL of 1.5% Bacto Agar in Vogel-Bonner-Medium with 2% glucose (Merck)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Postmitochondrial supernatant fluids from liver of male rats treated with Aroclor 1254 (S9 mix)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
Tween 80 in water
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
2-aminoanthracene for all 5 strains with S9
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
sodium azide
other: 4-nitro-o-phenyldiamine
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
48 h incubation at 37 °C

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 test series, each in triplicates

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
background lawn

- OTHER:
Counting of colonies with BioTran-III-Counter (Biotronik)
Evaluation criteria:
- no cytotoxicity as determined by assessment of bacterial lawn
- spontaneous mutation rates within the characteristic ranges as given in report
- positive control mutation rates at least 2-fold as compared to TA100 and at least 3-fold as compared to other strains at at least two different tested concentrations

Statistics:
None
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid

First test series  24 Jul – 26 Jul 1985

TA1535

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

15

14

8

21

10

13

 

16

20

11

11

16

12

Sodium acide, 2 µg/plate

420

404

382

189

181

206

2-Aminoanthracene, 2.5 µg/plate

9

15

12

117

111

127

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

9

10

17

12

9

14

1000

13

14

20

11

16

12

200

9

13

8

16

13

15

40

7

9

8

12

13

12

8

9

8

10

16

14

9

 

TA100

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

88

79

77

85

81

67

 

82

86

88

80

90

80

Sodium acide, 2 µg/plate

400

260

374

263

255

308

2-Aminoanthracene, 5 µg/plate

71

63

75

1789

1735

1653

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

70

113

74

123

97

105

1000

99

103

112

107

94

94

200

92

108

67

106

98

99

40

88

73

61

100

103

104

8

68

69

60

88

84

85

 

TA1537

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

5

5

4

6

6

5

 

6

9

5

8

7

7

9-aminoacridine, 80 µg/plate

289

304

354

345

362

337

2-Aminoanthracene, 2.5 µg/plate

6

6

7

145

153

167

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

7

10

4

8

6

7

1000

5

6

6

5

6

8

200

5

4

6

6

5

10

40

4

6

7

5

7

9

8

8

4

7

6

9

7

 

TA1538

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

17

10

11

24

25

17

 

10

14

6

13

18

17

4-Nitro-o-phenyldiamin, 40 µg/plate

460

552

555

1081

917

1034

2-Aminoanthracene, 5 µg/plate

18

16

15

1568

2028

1722

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

12

7

15

17

16

23

1000

17

14

13

25

13

21

200

13

18

9

13

26

15

40

9

8

12

13

15

19

8

18

15

12

13

20

12

 

TA98

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

19

18

18

22

31

22

 

16

29

20

16

30

24

4-Nitro-o-phenyldiamin, 40 µg/plate

360

333

342

651

689

685

2-Aminoanthracene, 5 µg/plate

17

18

26

1474

1424

1647

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

28

22

28

17

14

24

1000

24

30

18

21

13

13

200

20

24

21

16

18

27

40

24

25

25

21

21

23

8

17

21

20

18

33

26

 

Second test series           13 Aug – 15 Aug 1985

TA1535

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

8

11

7

4

9

14

 

9

7

12

13

7

5

Sodium acide, 2 µg/plate

326

392

396

245

257

278

2-Aminoanthracene, 2.5 µg/plate

11

6

4

257

262

256

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

7

8

8

13

8

11

1000

8

11

7

11

9

11

200

6

9

12

5

13

4

40

11

6

16

5

8

7

8

10

7

7

10

12

16

 

TA100

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

51

37

66

87

79

90

 

53

65

70

68

69

70

Sodium acide, 2 µg/plate

217

211

198

95

159

232

2-Aminoanthracene, 5 µg/plate

42

39

53

1828

1001

1672

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

57

62

47

82

67

91

1000

46

58

41

96

73

83

200

46

53

56

93

49

62

40

48

61

52

71

92

61

8

48

39

44

82

74

67

 

TA1537

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

2

3

7

10

13

7

 

3

3

7

5

13

11

9-aminoacridine, 80 µg/plate

183

229

224

183

137

145

2-Aminoanthracene, 2.5 µg/plate

6

4

4

234

215

239

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

6

4

1

6

4

6

1000

5

4

3

5

3

6

200

3

5

2

11

5

7

40

1

3

3

6

3

2

8

5

6

5

7

5

5

 

TA1538

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

12

13

14

26

21

12

 

10

13

13

27

20

26

4-Nitro-o-phenyldiamin, 40 µg/plate

538

550

305

998

1043

998

2-Aminoanthracene, 5 µg/plate

20

26

30

1742

1839

1822

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

7

10

20

17

26

30

1000

9

16

12

27

28

23

200

12

5

11

23

25

25

40

13

9

16

22

19

22

8

12

15

15

20

29

22

 

TA98

Without S9 Mix

 

 

With S9 Mix

 

 

Negative control

22

20

17

27

29

29

 

21

17

18

28

39

25

4-Nitro-o-phenyldiamin, 40 µg/plate

361

323

354

741

669

782

2-Aminoanthracene, 5 µg/plate

32

21

22

2236

2424

2102

Test material [µg/plate]

 

 

 

 

 

 

5000

17

13

24

22

26

25

1000

12

21

15

21

20

32

200

16

29

20

24

34

31

40

13

21

19

33

33

33

8

15

25

19

30

34

31

 

Conclusions:
CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
09 Apr - 10 May 2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Target gene:
Not applicable
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat liver S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
3, 10 and 33 µg/mL
At a concentration of 33 µg/mL and above precipitation was seen in the culture medium.


Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Ethanol
Untreated negative controls:
not specified
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Ethanol
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
with rat liver S9-mix; 10 µg/mL
Untreated negative controls:
not specified
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Ethanol
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Remarks:
without rat liver S9-mix; 0.5 µg/mL for a 3 h exposure period, 0.2 µg/mL for a 24 h exposure period and 0.1 µg/mL for a 48 h exposure period
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3, 24 and 48h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 3h treatment: 24 and 48h; 24h treatment: 24h; 48h treatment: 48h

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colchicine 0.5 µL/mL medium
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa 5% (v/v) in tap water

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 (duplicates at the 3h-exposure time)

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per culture

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index of 1000 cells

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
Evaluation criteria:
A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if: a) It induced a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations. b) A statistically significant and biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if none of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations. The preceding criteria are not absolute and other modifying factors might enter into the final evaluation decision.
Statistics:
Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05
Key result
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: cultured human peripheral lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At a concentration of 33 µg/mL 2-ethylhexyl oleate precipitated in the culture medium
- Other confounding effects: 2-ethylhexyl oleate showed no significant effects on the number of polyploid cells

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The highest concentration analysed was selected based on the solubility of the test substance in the culture medium (3 h and 24 h continuous exposure) or on toxicity, inhibition of the mitotic index of about 50% or greater (48 h continuous exposure).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
No cytotoxicity was observed in the duplicate cultures of the 3h exposure time.

Table 1: Cytotoxic and Genotoxic observations

Test item

Concentration

Mitotic Index

Aberrant cells in %

 

in µg/mL

in %

with gaps

without gaps

Exposure period 3 h, fixation time 24 h, without S9 mix

Ethanol

1.0% (v/v)

100

2

2

MMC

0.5

67

31

30

Test substance

3

99

1

1

10

98

2

2

33

92

1

1

Exposure period 3 h, fixation time 24 h, with S9 mix

Ethanol

1.0% (v/v)

100

1

1

CP

0.5

51

38

38

Test substance

3

101

1

1

10

108

0

0

33

103

3

3

Exposure period 24 h, fixation time 24 h, without S9 mix

Ethanol

1.0% (v/v)

100

1

1

MMC

0.2

54

34

33

Test substance

3

99

1

1

10

103

3

3

33

70

4

3

Exposure period 48 h, fixation time 48 h, without S9 mix

Ethanol

1.0% (v/v)

100

2

0

MMC

0.1

120

51

49

Test substance

3

108

1

0

10

100

0

0

33

99

2

2

Exposure period 3 h, fixation time 48 h, with S9 mix

Ethanol

1.0% (v/v)

100

0

0

CP

10.0

--

44

44

Test substance

3

100

2

2

10

94

2

2

33

97

1

0

MMC: Mitomycin          CP: Cyclophosphamide

                    

Conclusions:
CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
09 Apr - 27 Jul 2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene
Target gene:
Thymidine Kinase locus (TK gene)
Species / strain / cell type:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Rat liver microsomal enzymes were prepared from adult male Wistar rats which were treated with phenobarbital (89 mg/kg bw) and β-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg bw).
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 33, 100 µg/mL
Precipitation in the exposure medium was seet at concentrations of 100 µg/mL and above.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Ethanol
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Ethanol
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
With metabolic activation; 7.5 µg/mL
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
Without metabolic activation; 15 and 5 µg/mL for a 3 and 24 hours treatment period
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
For 3-hour exposure: Cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
For 24-hour exposure: Cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
Selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of serum = 20%, R20) and 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT). Non selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of serum = 20%, R20) .

DURATION
- Exposure duration: In experiment 1 - 3 hours. Experiment 2 - 24 hours (- S9 mix) and 3 hours (+S9)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 11-12 days

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Trifluorothymidine (TFT)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 0.5 mg/mL of 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2-yl]-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT).

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 1

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: Whole wells counted

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Relative total growth

Evaluation criteria:
In addition to the criteria stated below, any increase of the mutation frequency will be evaluated for its biological relevance including a comparison of the results with the historical control data range.
The global evalulation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWTG as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
A test substance is considered postive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a mutation factor (MF) of more than MF(control) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range. The test substance will be considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
Thes test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if:
a) None of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126.
b) The resullts are confirmed in an indepedently repeated test.
Key result
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: 2-Ethylhexyl oleate was tested beyond the limit of the solubility to obtain adequate cytotoxicity data, the concentration used as the highest test substance concentration for the dose range finding test was 333 µg/mL.
- Precipitation: 2-Ethylhexyl oleate precipitated in the exposure medium at concentrations of 100 µg/mL and above.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the dose finding test, L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells were treated with a test substance concentration range of 3 to 333 µg/mL in the absence of S9-mix with a 3 and 24-hour treatment period and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3-hour treatment period.
After 3 hours treatment and 24 and 48 hours subculture, no toxicity in the suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test substance concentration of 333 µg/mL compared to the suspension growth of the solvent control both in the absence of S9-mix and presence of S9-mix.
After 24 hours of treatment and 24-hour subculture, in the absence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to test substance concentration of 333 µg/mL compared to the solvent control.


COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent-treated control cultures were between the
minimum and maximum value of the historical control data range. See Table 1 to 4.

Table 1. Experiment 1: Cytotoxic and mutagenic response of 2-Ethylhexyl oleate in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system.

Dose (µg/mL)

RSG (%)

CEday2(%)

RSday2 (%)

RTG (%)

Mutation Frequency x 10-6

Total

Small

Large

 

                           Without metabolic activation (3-hour treatment)

SC1

100

89

100

100

100

69

28

SC2

 100

108

100 

100 

99

67

28

0.03

106

105

107

113

87

63

20

0.1

102

101

102

104

76

50

23

0.3

88

86

88

77

109

71

34

1

107

99

101

108

99

73

22

3

106

97

98

104

93

64

25

10

103

105

107

110

88

62

22

33

82

111

113

92

133

86

38

100(1)

82

120

121

100

93

67

22

MMS

66

56

57

37

1463

939

292

 

With 8% (v/v) metabolic activation (3-hour treatment)

SC1

100

65

100

100

68

41

26

SC2

 100

67

100 

 100

58

32

25

0.03

96

66

100

96

73

45

26

0.1

102

63

95

97

71

39

30

0.3

93

67

102

94

71

46

24

1

107

66

100

107

71

40

29

3

108

58

88

95

74

53

20

10

107

53

80

85

74

50

22

33

95

62

94

89

74

43

29

100(1)

100

54

81

81

68

44

23

CP

57

44

66

38

752

574

137

Note: all calculations were made without rounding off.

RSG = Relative Suspension Growth; CE = Cloning Efficiency; RS = Relative Survival; RTG = Relative Total Growth; SC = Solvent control = Ethanol; MMS Methylmethanesulfonate; CP = Cyclophosphamide.

(1) = 2-Ethylhexyl oleate precipitated in the exposure medium.

Table 2. Experiment 2: Cytotoxic and mutagenic response of 2-Ethyl oleate in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system.

Dose (µg/mL)

RSG (%)

CEday2(%)

RSday2 (%)

RTG (%)

Mutation Frequency x 10-6

Total

Small

Large

 

                           Without metabolic activation (24-hour treatment)

SC1

100

85

100

100

59

35

22

SC2

100 

93

100

100 

63

35

26

0.03

119

93

104

124

67

36

29

0.1

134

91

103

138

56

34

21

0.3

121

115

129

156

40

20

20

1

124

97

109

135

47

35

12

3

105

89

100

105

57

38

18

10

124

94

106

131

52

27

24

33

119

99

112

133

58

31

25

100(1)

129

97

109

140

44

28

15

MMS

106

81

92

97

503

305

152

 

With 12% (v/v) metabolic activation (3-hour treatment)

SC1

100

76

100

100

102

51

47

SC2

100

101

100

100

76

38

35

0.03

96

81

92

88

82

44

36

0.1

100

80

91

91

82

44

35

0.3

103

95

108

111

97

52

41

1

106

101

114

121

70

41

27

3

102

83

94

95

85

40

42

10

96

88

99

95

76

46

28

33

99

81

92

91

89

55

31

100(1)

98

86

98

96

73

37

34

MMS

62

66

75

46

1337

776

310

Table 3. Historical control data of the spontaneous mutation frequencies of the solvent controls of the mouse lymphoma assay.

 

                         -S9-mix

          +S9-mix

3-hour treatment

24-hour treatment

 

Range

[51-120] x 10-6

[50-127] x10-6

[50-170] x 10-6

Mean

77 x 10-6

80 x 10-6

92 x 10-6

SD

18 x 10-6

19 x10-6

33 x10-6

n

88

82

141

SD = Standard deviation

n = Number of observation

The above mentioned historical control data range of the solvent controls were obtained by collecting all data of the solvent control values (media, DMSO, and ethanol) over the period of June 2006 to June 2009.

Table 4. Historical control data of the spontaneous mutation frequencies of the positive controls for the mouse lymphoma assay.

 

                         -S9-mix

          +S9-mix

3-hour treatment

24-hour treatment

 

Range

[518-2052] x 10-6

[578-1533] x10-6

[724-3715] x 10-6

Mean

1004 x 10-6

1063 x 10-6

1597 x 10-6

SD

356 x 10-6

232 x10-6

712 x10-6

n

45

34

81

 

The above mentioned historical control data range of the positive controls were obtained by collecting all data over the period of June 2006 to June 2009.

Conclusions:
CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
11 Feb - 20 Apr 1998
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Target gene:
Not applicable
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes: cultured human peripheral lymphocytes
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: F10 complete culture medium, containing Ham's F10 medium without thymidine and hypoxanthine (Gibco), supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated (56 °C; 30 min) foetal calf serum (Gibco), L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 μg/mL respectively), sodium bicarbonate (1.2 g/L) and 30 U/mL heparin.
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment 1:
24 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, without metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
48 h treatment, 48 h harvest time, without metabolic activation: 1000 µg/mL
3 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, with metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
3 h treatment, 48 h harvest time, with metabolic activation: 1000 µg/mL

Experiment 2:
24 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, without metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
3 h treatment, 24 h harvest time, with metabolic activation: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL

Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
0.9% DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: mitomycine C (0.2 µg/mL, 24 h treatment time, -S9; 0.1 µg/mL, 48 h treatment time, -S9) and cyclophosphamide (15 µg/mL in nutrient medium, 3 h treatment time, +S9)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 h with metabolic activation, 24 and 48 h without metabolic activation
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 and 48 h fixation time with and without metabolic activation

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 0.5 µg/mL colcemid, added 3 hours before harvest time (21 h with metabolic activation, 21 and 45 h without metabolic activation)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 5% (v/v) Gimsa

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 (100 per culture, duplicate cultures)

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index of 1000 cells

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes

OTHER:
blood samples were taken from healthy, adult male volunteers by venapuncture, using a sterile vessel containing sodium heparine. The blood samples were stored at 4-25 ºC. Cultures were started within 4 h after blood collection. The average generation time of the cells is 13.6-14.1 h. Cultures were incubated at 37 ºC for 48 h prior to exposure to the test substance.
Evaluation criteria:
A chromosome aberration test was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The numbers of chromosome aberrations found in the solvent control cultures should reasonably be within the laboratory historical control data range (min = 0, max = 5 (mean = 0.9, standard deviation = 1.0) aberrant cells per 100 metaphases in the absence of S9-mix; gaps excluded and min = 0, max = 5 (mean = 0.7, standard deviation = 0.9) aberrant cells per 100 metaphases in the presence of S9-mix; gaps excluded)
b) The positive control substances should produce a statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
c) A homogeneous response between the replicate cultures is observed.

A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) It induced a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
b) A statistically significant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) None of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations
The preceding criteria were not absolute and other modifying factors might enter into the final evaluation decision.
Statistics:
The incidence of aberrant cells (cells with one or more chromosome aberrations, inclusive or exclusive gaps) for each treatment group was compared to that of the solvent control using Chi-square statistics.
Key result
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: cultured human peripheral lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at 1000 µg/mL.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
A range-finding test was performed to select the dose levels for the main experiment, using 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL, with and without metabolic activation. The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at 1000 µg/mL (see Table 1).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
no cytotoxicity was observed at any concentration, with or without metabolic activation (see Table 2 and 3).

Table 1: results of range-finding assay

 

Metabolic activation

Test substance concentration (μg/mL)

Mitotic index (%)

 

 

24 h harvesting time

48 h harvesting time

-

Vehicle control

(DMSO)

100

100

-

10

91

98

-

33

86

98

-

100

91

105

-

333

93

105

-

1000

100

91

+

Vehicle control

(DMSO)

100

 

+

10

92

-

+

33

90

-

+

100

94

-

+

333

98

-

+

1000

94

-

Table 1: Chromosome aberrations, summarised data, experiment 1

 

Metabolic activation

Test substance concentration (μg/mL)

Total number of metaphases analysed

Total number of aberrations1

Number of cells with aberrations1

Mitotic index (%)2

 

 

 

 

Incl. gaps

Excl. gaps

Incl. gaps

Excl. gaps

 

  24 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time

-

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

1

1

1

1

100

-

100

200

7

6

6

5

98

-

333

200

1

1

1

1

106

-

1000

200

3

2

3

2

106

-

mitomycin C

200

41

37

38***

34***

61

  48 h treatment, 48 h harvesting time

-

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

1

1

1

1

100

-

1000

200

1

1

1

1

81

-

mitomycin C

150

72

65

59***

55***

49

  3 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time

+

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

4

2

4

2

100

+

100

200

4

4

4

4

68

+

333

200

0

0

0

0

81

+

1000

200

1

1

1

1

73

+

cyclophosphamide

200

89

75

71***

63***

33

  3 h treatment, 48 h harvesting time

+

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

9

9

5

5

100

+

1000

200

1

1

1

1

81

1gaps include chromatid and isochromatid (chromosome) gaps

2percentage of metaphases per 1000 cells, compared to control

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 (Chi-square test)

 

 

 

Table 2: Chromosome aberrations, summarised data, experiment 2

 

Metabolic activation

Test substance concentration (μg/mL)

Total number of metaphases analysed

Total number of aberrations1

Number of cells with aberrations1

Mitotic index (%)2

 

 

 

 

Incl. gaps 

Excl. gaps

Incl. gaps

Excl. gaps

 

  24 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time

-

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

0

0

0

0

100

-

100

200

2

2

2

2

99

-

333

200

4

4

4

4

113

-

1000

200

1

1

1

1

97

-

mitomycin C

150

63

63

53***

53***

39

  3 h treatment, 24 h harvesting time

+

Vehicle control

(DMSO 1%)

200

3

3

3

3

100

+

100

200

2

2

2

2

108

+

333

200

2

2

2

2

101

+

1000

200

2

2

2

2

104

+

Cyclophosphamide

200

111

109

80***

79***

32

1gaps include chromatid and isochromatid (chromosome) gaps

2percentage of metaphases per 1000 cells, compared to control

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 (Chi-square test)

Conclusions:
CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Justification for type of information:
refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: cultured human peripheral lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: cultured human peripheral lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: Source:
Remarks:
CAS 26399-02-0 and 93803-87-3
Conclusions:
An analogue substance approach was used for Read Across to the target substance.
In an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test (OECD GL 473) in cultured human peripheral lymphocytes with the analogue substance 2-ethylhexyl oleate (CAS 26399-02-0) no genotoxicity was found at concentrations up to 33 µg/mL (precipitation at higher doses).
In an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration study (OECD GL 473) in primary peripheral human lymphocytes with the analogue substance 2-octyldodecyl isooctadecanoate (CAS 93803-87-3) no genotoxicity was found at concentrations up to 1000 µg/mL.
For the target substance no genotoxic effects on mammalian cells are anticipated.
CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Justification for type of information:
refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: Source:
Remarks:
CAS 26399-02-0
Conclusions:
An analogue substance approach was used for Read Across to the target substance.
In an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test (OECD GL 476) in mouse lymphoma cells with the analogue substance 2-ethylhexyl oleate (CAS 26399-02-0) no genotoxicity was found at concentrations up to 100 µg/mL (precipitation at higher doses).
For the target substance no genotoxic effects on mammalian cells are anticipated.
CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14 - 25 Jul 2022
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1997; corrected in 2020
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
his operon (for S. typhimurium strains)
trp operon (for the E.coli strain)
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: rfa (deep rough (defective lipopolysaccharide cellcoat)), gal (mutation in galactose metabolism); chl (mutation in nitrate reductase); bio (defective biotin synthesis); uvrB (loss of excision repair system (deletion of ultraviolet-repair B gene))
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: The strain lacks an excision repair system and is sensitive to agents such as UV. The sensitivity of the strain to a wide variety of mutagens has been enhanced by permeabilization of the strain using Tris-EDTA treatment.
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: Trinova Biochem GmbH (Giessen, Germany); prepared from male Sprague Dawley rats that have been dosed orally with a suspension of phenobarbital (80 mg/kg bw) and ß-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg bw)
- method of preparation of S9 mix: S9-mix was prepared immediately before use and kept refrigerated. S9-mix contained per 10 mL: 30 mg NADP (Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, United Kingdom) and 15.2 mg glucose-6-phosphate (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in 5.5 mL Milli-Q water (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA); 2 mL 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4; 1 mL 0.08 M MgCl2 solution (Merck); 1 mL 0.33 M KCl solution (Merck). The above solution was filter (0.22 µm)-sterilized. To 9.5 mL of S9-mix components, 0.5 mL S9-fraction was added (5% (v/v) S9-fraction) to complete the S9-mix.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix in the final culture medium: 0.5 mL S9 mix
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): Each S9 batch was characterized with the mutagens benzo-(a)-pyrene (Sigma) and 2-aminoanthracene, which require metabolic activation, in tester strain TA100 at concentrations of 5 µg/plate and 2.5 µg/plate, respectively.
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment 1 (Direct plate assay):
- all strains: 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600, 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation,

Experiment 2 (Pre-incubation assay):
- all strains: 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600, 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation

5000 µg/plate is the recommended maximum test concentration for soluble non-cytotoxic substances according to OECD 471.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Ethanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Ethanol was selected for use in the assay as it has been routinely used and validated for use in the bacterial reverse mutation assay. The test material formed a clear colourless solution in ethanol.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Ethanol
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
other: ICR-191; in DMSO; -S9 / TA1537 / 2.5 µg/plate (Exp 1); Methylmethanesulfonate - MMS; in DMSO; -S9 / TA 100 / 650 µg/plate (Exp 1 and 2);
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: three replicate plates / dose
- Number of independent experiments: 2 (direct plate and pre-incubation assay)

METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 10^9 cells/mL
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation; Experiment 1); pre-incubation (Experiment 2)

TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
Direct plate assay
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48 ± 4 h at 37.0 ± 1.0 °C
Pre-incubation assay
- Preincubation period: 30 ± 2 min at 37.0 ± 1.0 °C
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48 ± 4 h at 37.0 ± 1.0 °C

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Reduction of the bacterial background lawn, the increase in the size of the microcolonies and the reduction of the revertant colonies per plate.

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICITY
- The revertant colonies were counted automatically with the Sorcerer Colony Counter. Plates with sufficient test material precipitate to interfere with automated colony counting were counted manually. Evidence of test material precipitate on the plates and the condition of the bacterial background lawn were evaluated when considered necessary, macroscopically and/or microscopically by using a dissecting microscope.

OTHER
- The Salmonella typhimurium strains were checked at least every year to confirm their histidine-requirement, crystal violet sensitivity, ampicillin resistance (TA98 and TA100), UV-sensitivity and the number of spontaneous revertants.
- The Escherichia coli WP2uvrA strain was checked to confirm the tryptophan-requirement, UV-sensitivity and the number of spontaneous revertants at least every year.
Rationale for test conditions:
Test conditions according to OECD 471
Evaluation criteria:
A test material is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA 100 or WP2uvrA is not greater than two times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA 1535, TA 1537 or TA 98 is not greater than three times the concurrent control.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one follow-up experiment.

A test material is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA 100 or WP2uvrA is greater than two times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA 1535, TA 1537 or TA 98 is greater than three times the concurrent control.
b) In case a repeat experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one follow-up experiment.
Statistics:
Mean values and standard deviations were calculated.
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Remarks:
Precipitation at concentrations of 1600 μg/plate and upwards in Experiment 1 and 2 with and without S9-mix.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Remarks:
Precipitation at concentrations of 512 μg/plate and upwards in Experiment 1 and 1600 μg/plate and upwards in Experiment 2 with and without S9-mix.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Remarks:
Precipitation at concentrations of 512 μg/plate and upwards in Experiment 1 (with S9-mix) and 1600 μg/plate and upwards in Experiment 1 (without S9-mix) and in Experiment 2.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Remarks:
Precipitation at concentrations of 1600 μg/plate and upwards in Experiment 1 and 2 with and without S9-mix.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Remarks:
Precipitation at concentrations of 1600 μg/plate and upwards in Experiment 1 and 2 with and without S9-mix.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- The test material formed a clear colourless solution in ethanol.
- Precipitation: In Experiment 1, precipitation of the test material on the plates was observed at concentrations of 512 μg/plate and upwards in tester strains TA100 (absence and presence of S9-mix) and TA98 (presence of S9-mix). Precipitation of the test material on the plates was observed at concentrations of 1600 μg/plate and upwards in the other tester strains. In Experiment 2, precipitation of the test material on the plates was observed at concentrations of 1600 μg/plate and upwards in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix.

STUDY RESULTS:
In the Direct Plate Assay (Experiment 1) and Pre-Incubation Assay (Experiment 2), there was no increase in the number of revertants observed upon treatment with the test material under all conditions tested (refer to 'Any other information on results incl. tables', table 1 and 2).
The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly. There was no reduction of the bacterial background lawn and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants observed upon treatment with the test material under all conditions tested.

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
See 'Any other information on results incl. tables', table 3 and 4.

Table 1: Experiment 1 – Direct plate assay

Dose

(µg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies / 3 replicate plates (± SD)

TA1535

TA1537

TA98

TA100

WP2 uvrA

Mean

± SD

Mean

± SD

Mean

± SD

Mean

± SD

Mean

± SD

Without metabolic activation

Solvent control

9

4

5

4

20

2

94

20

12

2

1.7

8

4

3

2

10

2

94

12

15

4

5.4

8

3

3

2

10

2

86

20

17

4

17

7

2

2

1

15

5

90

5

15

3

52

5

1

4

2

19

7

89

2

14

4

164

6

2

3

1

13

2

77

6 NP

15

1

512

10

2 NP

2

2 NP

11

6 NP

84

14 SP

18

4 NP

1600

6

2 SP

3

1 SP

9

3 SP

93

13 SP

15

8 SP

5000

10

3 n SP

4

2 n SP

11

3 n SP

86

9 n SP

22

3 n SP

Positive control

903

83

1147

129

1044

242

662

106

984

250

With metabolic activation

Solvent control

9

3

7

4

22

7

59

13

20

2

1.7

9

5

2

2

15

7

72

8

17

2

5.4

5

3

4

1

17

3

58

7

13

3

17

8

5

7

6

21

6

74

13

21

3

52

5

3

4

1

18

5

77

11

24

6

164

8

3

2

2

19

1 NP

72

4 NP

15

1

512

5

3 NP

2

1 NP

23

4 SP

62

6 SP

17

5 NP

1600

9

2 SP

6

5 SP

20

3 SP

78

12 SP

19

4 SP

5000

5

3 n SP

4

1 n SP

22

11 n SP

80

13 n SP

20

5 n SP

Positive control

 

26

196

24

1176

196

812

173

339

23

NP = No precipitate

SP = Slight precipitate

n = Normal bacterial background lawn

 

Positive controls (without metabolic activation):

TA1535 – sodium azide (SA)

TA1537 – ICR-191

TA98 – 2-nitrofluorene (NF)

TA100 – methylmethanesulfonate (MMS)

WP2 uvrA - 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide (4-NQO)

 

Positive controls (with metabolic activation)

All strains – 2-aminoanthracene (2AA)

 

Table 2: Experiment 2 – Pre-incubation assay

Dose

(µg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies / 3 replicate plates (± SD)

TA1535

TA1537

TA98

TA100

WP2 uvrA

Mean

± SD

Mean

± SD

Mean

± SD

Mean

± SD

Mean

± SD

Without metabolic activation

Solvent control

6

5

4

1

13

1

89

10

19

10

17

7

3

4

1

6

3

95

7

19

1

52

9

6

3

2

9

1

95

6

19

3

164

10

1

2

1

12

2

89

10

23

2

512

6

2 NP

3

2 NP

8

3 NP

101

15 NP

22

11 NP

1600

9

6 SP

6

2 SP

8

4 e MC m SP1

89

8 SP

15

8 SP

5000

10

3 n SP

4

1 n SP

15

8 n SP

116

5 n SP

20

9 n SP

Positive control

723

65

1038

231

1362

1552

537

30

187

73

With metabolic activation

Solvent control

9

2

3

2

21

8

94

4

24

6

17

10

3

8

3

16

4

83

13

19

1

52

10

3

4

1

23

3

84

8

27

1

164

8

3

4

4

17

2

72

10

23

4

512

5

2 NP

5

4 NP

22

2 NP

84

10 NP

26

8 NP

1600

11

7 SP

6

2 SP

12

3 SP

91

4 SP

31

7 SP

5000

10

5 n SP

4

1 n SP

24

10 n SP

93

10 n SP

27

6 n SP

Positive control

125

50

259

110

614

26

470

400

446

25

1 = Considered a outlier due to effects only seen at one dose in the middle of the tested dose range

2 = Outlier excluded: Mean of two plates

MC = Microcolonies

NP = No precipitate

SP = Slight precipitate

e = Bacterial background lawn extremely reduced

m = Bacterial background lawn moderately reduced

n = Normal bacterial background lawn

 

Positive controls (without metabolic activation):

TA1535 – sodium azide (SA)

TA1537 and TA98 – 2-nitrofluorene (NF)

TA100 – methylmethanesulfonate (MMS)

WP2 uvrA - 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide (4-NQO)

 

Positive controls (with metabolic activation)

All strains – 2-aminoanthracene (2AA)

 

Table 3: Historical control data of the solvent control (Jun 2019 – Jun 2022)

 

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 100

WP2uvrA

S9-mix

-

+

-

+

-

+

-

+

-

+

Range

2 – 22

3 – 28

1 – 24

1 – 20

3 – 32

5 – 62

56 – 188

34 – 169

9 – 54

9 – 73

Mean

9

10

4

5

12

17

99

86

19

22

SD

2.6

2.8

2.1

2.3

3.6

5.1

16

20

5.0

6.4

Total number of plates

2242

2282

2274

2323

2337

2413

2347

2390

2137

2158

95% upper limit

14

15

8.1

9.5

19

27

130

126

29

35

95% lower limit

3.9

4.5

-0.12

0.49

4.8

7.0

68

46

9.2

9.5

SD = Standard deviation

 

Table 4: Historical control data of the positive control (Jun 2019 – Jun 2022)

 

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 98

TA 100

WP2uvrA

S9-mix

-

+

-

+

-

+

-

+

-

+

Range

95 – 1373

78 – 1145

71 – 2175

46 – 1989

379 – 2141

251 – 3369

167 – 1870

166 – 2185

89 – 2027

115 – 1642

Mean

863

261

863

253

1393

978

783

1259

1281

437

SD

176

109

377

164

319

416

189

426

361

209

Total number of plates

2054

2107

1609

2133

2180

2186

2133

2212

2002

1983

95% upper limit

1207

474

1603

574

2017

1794

1152

2093

1988

846

95% lower limit

519

48

123

-68

769

162

414

425

574

28

SD = Standard deviation

 

 

Conclusions:
Under the present test conditions, Fatty acids, C16-18, isononyl esters showed negative mutagenic responses in all bacterial strains over the entire dose-range.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

OECD 474 (read-across): negative in mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus assay

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
10 Feb-28 Mar 1998
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: Swiss, CD-1
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: approximately 7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 31.2-32.4 (males, range of mean group values), 24.2-25.8 (females, range of mean group values)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, assigned to treatment groups as they came to hand from delivery boxes
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: Five animals per sex per group were housed in labelled polycarbonate cages containing purified sawdust as bedding material (Woody SPF, supplied by B.M.I., Helmond, the Netherlands)
- Diet: standard pelleted laboratory animal diet (Carfil Quality BVBV, Oud-Turnhout, Belgium)
- Water: tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Route of administration:
intraperitoneal
Vehicle:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: corn oil
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
dosing solutions were prepared directly prior to administration by dissolving the test substance in corn oil. The dosing volume was 10 mL/kg bw.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Not applicable
Frequency of treatment:
Single treatment
Post exposure period:
24 or 48 h
Dose / conc.:
500 mg/kg bw (total dose)
Remarks:
nominal
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw (total dose)
Remarks:
nominal
Dose / conc.:
2 000 mg/kg bw (total dose)
Remarks:
nominal
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Positive control(s):
The positive control animals were dosed with cyclophosphamide.
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal injection
- Doses / concentrations: 50 mg/kg bw
Tissues and cell types examined:
Tissue: bone marrow
Cell type: bone marrow cells
Details of tissue and slide preparation:
CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
A suitable dose range for the micronucleus test was selected based on the results of a dose range-finding study. Two dose groups, each comprising 3 males and 3 females, received a single dose of the test substance. The animals were observed for 3 days, during which mortality and physical condition were recorded daily.

TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields):
The animals were dosed once and sacrificed by cervical dislocation at 24 or 48 h (2000 mg/kg bw test substance and vehicle control) or 24 h only (500 and 1000 mg/kg bw test substance, and positive control group)

DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
The femur bone was removed, and the bone marrow canal exposed and flushed with approximately 2 mL of foetal calf serum. The cell suspension was collected and centrifuged at 1000 rpm (approximately 100 g) for 5 min. The supernatant was removed with a Pasteur pipette. A drop of serum was left on the pellet. The cells in the sediment were carefully mixed with the serum by aspiration with the remaining serum. A drop of the cell suspension was placed on the end of a slide which was previously cleaned (24 h immersed in a 1:1 mixture of 96% (v/v) ethanol/ether and cleaned with a tissue) and marked (with the NOTOX study identification number and the animal number). The drop was spread by moving a clean slide at an angle of approximately 45° over the slide with the drop of bone marrow suspension. The preparations were then air-dried, fixed for 5 min in 100% methanol and air-dried overnight. Two slides were prepared per animal.The slides were automatically stained using the 'Wright-stain-procedure' in an 'Ames' HEMA-tek slide stainer (Miles, Bayer Nederland B.V.). The dry slides were dipped in xylene before they were embedded in MicroMount and mounted with a coverslip.

METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Slides were scored at a magnification of 1000 x. The number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was counted in 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes. The ratio polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was determined by counting and differentiating the first 1000 erythrocytes at the same time. Micronuclei were only counted in polychromatic erythrocytes.
Evaluation criteria:
A micronucleus test is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The positive control substance induced a statistically significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, two-sided test at P < 0.05) increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes.
b) The incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the control animals should reasonably be within the laboratory historical control data range.

A test substance is considered positive in the micronucleus test if:
It induced a biologically as well as a statistically significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test; two-sided test at P < 0.05) increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (at any dose or at any sampling time) in the combined data for both sexes or in the data for male or female groups separately.
A test substance is considered negative in the micronucleus test if:
None of the tested concentrations or sampling times showed a statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes neither in the combined data for both sexes nor in the data for male or female groups alone.
The preceding criteria are not absolute and other modifying factors may enter into the final evaluation decision.
Statistics:
The Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test; two-sided test (P < 0.05) was for all statistical calculations.
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
no effects
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: no effects were observed

RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): no increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed in the polychromatic erythrocytes from the bone marrow of test substance treated animals (see Table 1 and 2). The positive control substance (cyclophosphamide) induced a statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in both sexes, showing the positive control was valid.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): The animals of the groups that were treated with the test substance did not show a decrease in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes compared with the vehicle controls. As the highest dose of the test substance was the recommended limit dose according to the guideline, the study result is acceptable, despite the lack of toxicity at the highest dose level. The groups that were treated with cyclophosphamide showed a decrease in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes compared with the vehicle controls.

Table 1: Results of the in vivo micronucleus assay in male animals

Exposure group

Sampling time (h)

Number of animals

Number of micronucleated PCEs/ 2000 PCEs (mean±SD)

Ratio PCEs/ NCEs (mean±SD)

Vehicle (corn oil)

24

5

0.4±0.5

0.99±0.02

Vehicle (corn oil)

48

5

0.2±0.4

1.01±0.04

500 mg/kg bw

24

5

0.8±0.8

1.00±0.03

1000 mg/kg bw

24

5

0.2±0.4

0.99±0.01

2000 mg/kg bw

24

5

0.6±0.9

1.01±0.04

2000 mg/kg bw

48

5

0.4±0.5

1.00±0.01

Cyclophosphamide

48

5

25.0±8.0*

0.51±0.20

PCE = polychromatic erythrocyte

NCE = normochromatic erythrocytes

*Significantly different from corresponding control group (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, P < 0.05)

 

 

Table 2: Results of the in vivo micronucleus assay in female animals

Exposure group

Sampling time (h)

Number of animals

Number of micronucleated PCEs/ 2000 PCEs (mean±SD)

Ratio PCEs/ NCEs (mean±SD)

Vehicle (corn oil)

24

5

0.6±0.9

1.01±0.02

Vehicle (corn oil)

48

5

0.0±0.0

0.99±0.02

500 mg/kg bw

24

5

1.2±0.8

1.02±0.02

1000 mg/kg bw

24

5

0.6±0.5

0.98±0.02

2000 mg/kg bw

24

5

0.4±0.5

0.99±0.07

2000 mg/kg bw

48

5

0.4±0.5

1.00±0.02

Cyclophosphamide

48

5

13.2±2.8*

0.56±0.05

PCE = polychromatic erythrocyte

NCE = normochromatic erythrocytes

*Significantly different from corresponding control group (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, P < 0.05)

Conclusions:
CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
Refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
no effects
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Source: CAS 93803-87-3
Conclusions:
CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
The available data on a suitable source substance did not show any cytogenic effect in mammalian erythrocytes in vivo. Therefore, the target substance Fatty acids, C16-18, isononyl esters is not predicted to be genotoxic in mammalian cells in vivo.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Read Across Justification


Limited data on the genotoxic potential of the target substance Fatty acids, C16-18, isononyl esters (CAS 91031-57-1) were available, comprising two bacterial reverse mutation tests.


The assessment was therefore supported using studies conducted with analogue substances as read across approach, which is in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, Annex XI, 1.5. For each specific endpoint the source substance(s) structurally closest to the target substance is/are chosen for read-across, with due regard to the requirements of adequacy and reliability of the available data. Structural similarities and similarities in properties and/or activities of the source and target substance are the basis of read-across. A detailed justification for the analogue read-across approach is provided in the technical dossier (see IUCLID Section 13).


 


Genetic toxicity (mutagenicity) in bacteria in vitro


CAS 91031-57-1


The ability of the registration substance to induce reverse mutations at the histidine locus in several strains of Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537), and at the tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain WP2uvrA, either in the presence or absence of a metabolic activation system (S9-mix) was examined according to OECD 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay) and GLP principles (Key, 2022). The test was performed in two independent experiments: a direct plate assay (Experiment 1) and a pre-incubation assay (Experiment 2). The vehicle/solvent in the study was ethanol. In Experiment 1, the test item was tested at concentrations of 1.7 - 5000 µg/plate in all strains. The test item precipitated on the plates at dose levels of 512 μg/plate and upwards. No toxicity was observed at any of the dose levels tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed. In Experiment 2, the test item was tested at concentrations of 17 - 5000 µg/plate in all strains. The test item precipitated on the plates at dose levels of 1600 μg/plate and upwards. No toxicity was observed at any of the dose levels tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed. The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly. The test item did not induce a biologically relevant, dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (S. typhimurium TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain E. coli WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation. Based on the results of this study it was concluded that the registration substance was not mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay.


The in vitro genetic toxicity of Fatty acids, C16-18, isononyl esters (CAS 91031-57-1) was also assessed in a bacterial reverse mutation study (Ames test), performed under GLP conditions according to a protocol similar to OECD guideline 471 (WoE, 1985). S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 were exposed to the test substance at concentrations up to 5000 µg/plate. No TA 102 or E. coli strain was included. The vehicle and positive controls were valid in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The test substance did not induce reversions in the S. typhimurium strains, with or without metabolic activation.


 


Genetic toxicity (mutagenicity) in mammalian cells in vitro


CAS 26399-02-0


An in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay was performed with 2-ethylhexyl oleate (CAS 26399-02-0) according to OECD guideline 476 (WoE, 2010, MLA). Two independent experiments (with 3 or 24 hours of exposure) were performed in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9-mix) with test substance concentrations up to 100 μg/mL dissolved in ethanol. Precipitation was seen at concentrations of 100 µg/mL and higher. The positive and vehicle controls were valid and within the range of historical control data. No significant increase in mutation frequency was observed.


 


Genetic toxicity (cytogenicity) in mammalian cells in vitro


CAS 26399-02-0


The cytogenetic potential of 2-ethylhexyl oleate (CAS 26399-02-0) was assessed in an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test in primary human lymphocytes, performed according to OECD guideline 473 (WoE, 2010, CA). Duplicate cultures of human lymphocytes were evaluated for chromosome aberrations in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. In the first experiment, cells were incubated with test substance concentrations of 3, 10 and 33 µg/mL in ethanol for 3 hours with a 24 hours fixation time in the absence and presence of a metabolic activation system. In the second experiment cells were incubated with 3, 10 and 33 µg/mL for 24 hours followed by 24 hours expression time and for 48 hours following 48 hours expression time, all without metabolic activation. In the presence of metabolic activation 2-ethylhexyl oleate was also tested with 3, 10 and 33 µg/mL for 3 hours followed by 48 hours expression time. 33 µg/mL was the maximum concentration due to the limited solubility of the test substance. The highest concentration of the test substance caused modest cytotoxicity. The vehicle (solvent) and positive controls were shown to be valid. The test material did not induce a statistically significant increase in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations, with or without metabolic activation.


CAS 93803-87-3


The cytogenetic potential of 2-octyldodecyl isooctadecanoate (CAS 93803-87-3) was assessed in an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test in primary human lymphocytes, performed according to OECD Guideline 473 and under GLP conditions (WoE, 1998, CA). Duplicate cultures of cultured human peripheral lymphocytes were evaluated for chromosome aberrations in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. In the first experiment, cells were incubated with test substance concentrations of 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL for 24 hours with a 24-hour fixation time and at 1000 µg/mL for 48 hours with a 48-hour fixation time, in the absence of a metabolic activation system. The first experiment was also performed with cells exposed to 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL for 3 hours with a 24-hour fixation time and at 1000 µg/mL for 3 hours with a 48-hour fixation time in the presence of metabolic activation. In the second experiment cells were incubated with 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL for 24 hours followed by a 24-hour expression time, without metabolic activation. In the presence of metabolic activation cell were exposed to 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL for 3 hours followed by a 24-hour expression time. No cytotoxicity was observed. At 1000 µg/mL, precipitation was observed in the culture medium. The vehicle and positive controls were valid. The test material did not induce a statistically significant increase in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations, with or without metabolic activation.


 


Genetic toxicity (cytogenicity) in vivo


An in vivo mammalian somatic cell study (erythrocyte micronucleus test) was conducted with 2-octyldodecyl isooctadecanoate (CAS 93803-87-3) according to OECD guideline 474 (MN, 1998, RL1). Male and female CD-1 mice (5 per sex and dose group) were treated with doses of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg by single intraperitoneal injection. Corn oil was used as vehicle. At 24 and 48 hours after injection the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was counted in 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal. No significant increase (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test; two-sided test (P < 0.05) in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed as compared to the vehicle control. The positive control (cyclophosphamide) was valid. No in vivo genotoxicity was detected.


 


Overall conclusion for genetic toxicity


The analogue read-across from source substances was applied from in vitro studies on cytogenicity, and in vitro studies on gene mutation in mammalian cells, and in vivo studies on mammalian cytogenicity. The results of the available studies were consistently negative. Based on the available data from analogue substances and the bacterial reverse mutation assays performed with the target substance, no mutagenic or clastogenic potential is expected for Fatty acids, C16-18, isononyl esters (CAS 91031-57-1).

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 "General Requirements for Generation of Information on Intrinsic Properties of substances", information on intrinsic properties of substances may be generated by means other than tests e.g. from information from structurally related substances (grouping or read-across), provided that conditions set out in Annex XI are met. Annex XI, "General rules for adaptation of this standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X” states that “substances whose physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a regular pattern as a result of structural similarity may be considered as a group, or ‘category’ of substances. This avoids the need to test every substance for every endpoint". Since the analogue concept is applied to Fatty acids, C16-18, isononyl esters (CAS 91031-57-1), data will be generated from data for reference source substance(s) to avoid unnecessary animal testing. Additionally, once the analogue read-across concept is applied, substances will be classified and labelled on this basis.


Therefore, based on the analogue read-across approach and data on the target substance Fatty acids, C16-18, isononyl esters (CAS 91031-57-1), the available data on genetic toxicity do not meet the classification criteria according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.