Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Data waiving:
study technically not feasible
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because the substance is highly insoluble in water
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reference
Endpoint:
transformation / dissolution of metals and inorganic metal compounds
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2015-05-06 to 2015-06-15
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 29 (23-Jul-2001): Guidance document on transformation/dissolution of metals and metal compounds in aqueous media
Version / remarks:
2001
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
other: transformation/ dissolution
Key result
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
< 0.904 µg/L
Element analysed:
Fe
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
672 h
Test conditions:
pH 6, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other: at least
Key result
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
< 0.301 µg/L
Element analysed:
Fe
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
168 h
Test conditions:
pH 6, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other:
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
< 0.301 µg/L
Element analysed:
Fe
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
24 h
Test conditions:
pH 6, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other:
Key result
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
< 0.185 µg/L
Element analysed:
Fe
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
672 h
Test conditions:
pH 8, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other:
Key result
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
< 0.185 µg/L
Element analysed:
Fe
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
168 h
Test conditions:
pH 8, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other:
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
< 0.555 µg/L
Element analysed:
Fe
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
24 h
Test conditions:
pH 8, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other: at least
Key result
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
< 0.445 µg/L
Element analysed:
Zn
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
672 h
Test conditions:
pH 6, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other: at least < LOQ (<0.4446)
Key result
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
2.746 µg/L
Element analysed:
Zn
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
168 h
Test conditions:
pH 6, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other: SD: ± 0.241 µg/L
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
1.537 µg/L
Element analysed:
Zn
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
24 h
Test conditions:
pH 6, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other: SD: ± 1.448 µg/L
Key result
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
< 0.041 µg/L
Element analysed:
Zn
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
672 h
Test conditions:
pH 8, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other: < LOD (<0.0411)
Key result
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
< 0.041 µg/L
Element analysed:
Zn
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
168 h
Test conditions:
pH 8, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Remarks on result:
other: < LOD (<0.0411)
Type of test:
full transformation/dissolution test - metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds
Mean dissolved conc.:
0.209 µg/L
Element analysed:
Zn
Loading of aqueous phase:
1 mg/L
Incubation duration:
24 h
Test conditions:
pH 8, agitation at 100 rpm, 21.5 ± 1.5 °C
Details on results:
Temperature
The temperature of the thermostatically controlled room was recorded with a Testo 175-T2 data logger. The mean temperature was 20.3 ± 0.3 °C during the test with 1 mg/L loading at pH 6 and 20.4 ± 0.2 °C during the test at pH 8. Therefore, the mean temperature is in agreement with the OECD guidance document 29.

Solution pH and oxygen concentrations
In solutions containing 1 mg/L of the test item at pH 6 and pH 8 as well as in method blanks (BW), the pHs were in the range of 5.8 – 6.6 and 7.4 – 8.1, respectively

Mass balance
The measured iron concentrations in samples with test item were mostly below respective LODs/LOQs or slightly above. Therefore, these amounts of iron were not considered for calculation of mass balance. The recovery was 21.4 % - 61.0 % for pH 6 and 42.0 – 51.4 % for pH 8., indicating that aqua regia is not sufficient for a complete dissolution of the test item. This is expected for inorganic pigments.

Within-vessel variation and between-vessel variation
According to the guidance, “[…]it is reasonable to anticipate that for a constant loading of a substance, tested in a narrow particle size (e.g. 37 - 44 μm) and total surface area range, the within-vessel variation in transformation data should be less than 10 % and the between-vessel variation should be less than 20 %”.
The particle size distribution of each loading replicate may differ and thus resulting in different overall total surface areas per vessel. Since the exposed surface area is affecting the rate of transformation and dissolution of sparingly soluble metal compounds, increases in vessel variations may be observed in tests of materials with wider particle size distributions.
For the measured iron and zinc concentrations these variations are mostly not within the limits
Background concentrations for zinc at pH 6 and pH 8 were measured to be in the range of test item loaded samples. Therefore, the measured concentrations from test item loaded vessels at pH 6 and 8 were background (means) corrected. The background concentration of iron was below the LOD.

Method validation summary

Validation parameter Results Comment
selectivity

selective wavelength and isotopes for detection

and evaluation of Fe and Zn

linearity applied calibration functions were linear correlation factor at least 0.999961
limit of detection

Fe: 0.1216 – 0.7443 µg/L

Zn: 0.0149 – 0.1482 µg/L

limit of quantification

Fe: 0.3647 – 2.2298 µg/L

Zn: 0.0448 – 0.4446 µg/L

accuracy and precision

Mean recovery for TM-25.4

1st series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 94.6 ± 1.6 % (n = 10)

Zn (213.857 nm): 103.1 ± 1.8 % (n = 10)

2nd series:

Fe (240.489 nm): 92.2 ± 2.7 % (n = 4)

3rd series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 113.9 ± 39.8 % (n = 11)

Zn (202.548 nm): 98.9 ± 3.4 % (n = 11)

4th series:

Fe (239.563 nm): 108.2 ± 23.5 % (n = 4)

5th series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 103.1 ± 21.7 % (n = 7)

Zn (202.548 nm): 99.6 ± 2.7 % (n = 7)

Diluted (5 fold) to

6.2 μg Fe/L,

8.9 μg Zn/L

Due to ubiquitous Fe a slight contamination cannot be excluded for two samples from 3rd series, one sample from 4th series and one sample from 5th series. These are not within 100 ± 15 % resulting in these standard deviations. Not critical > 60% of all QA/QC samples are within these limits.

accuracy and precision

Mean recovery for TMDA-53.3

2nd series:

Fe (240.489 nm): 100.8 ± 1.9 % (n = 4)

3rd series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 110.1 ± 39.7 % (n = 11)

Zn (202.548 nm): 96.3 ± 1.1 % (n = 11)

4th series:

Fe (239.563 nm): 103.6 ± 7.1 % (n = 4)

5th series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 99.6 ± 5.1 % (n = 7)

Zn (202.548 nm): 102.5 ± 11.1 % (n = 7)

Diluted (10 fold) to

32.5 μg Fe/L,

38.5 μg Zn/L

The increased standard deviation in the 3rd series for Fe might be due to a contamination with ubiquitious Fe; one sample is not within 100 ± 15 %. Not critical > 60% of all QA/QC samples are within these limits.

accuracy and precision

Mean recovery for TMDA-53.3

1st series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 97.9 ± 1.1 % (n = 10)

Zn (213.857 nm): 102.4 ± 1.0 % (n = 10)

Diluted (5 fold) to

65 μg Fe/L,

77.2 μg Zn/L

accuracy and precision

Mean recovery for quality control standard QC

1st series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 95.5 ± 1.8 % (n = 10)

Zn (213.857 nm): 92.4 ± 2.1 % (n = 10)

2nd series:

Fe (240.489 nm): 98.5 ± 2.0 % (n = 4)

Diluted to

10 μg Fe/L,

10 μg Zn/L

accuracy and precision

Mean recovery for quality control standard QC1

3rd series: Fe (259.940 nm): 96.6 ± 0.9 % (n = 8); Zn (202.548 nm): 95.4 ± 1.6 % (n = 8)

4th series: Fe (239.563 nm): 97.3 ± 2.1 % (n = 4)

5th series: Fe (259.940 nm): 95.8 ± 2.1 % (n = 7); Zn (202.548 nm): 92.4 ± 2.4 % (n = 7)

Diluted to

10 μg Fe/L,

10 μg Zn/L

accuracy and precision

Mean recovery for quality control standard QC1

3rd series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 97.2 ± 0.6 % (n = 2)

Zn (202.548 nm): 95.1 ± 0.3 % (n = 3)

Diluted to

100 μg Fe/L,

100 μg Zn/L

In the 3rd series one sample with a recovery of 428 % regarding Fe is rejected because this can assigned to a Fe contamination.

Not critical > 60% of all QA/QC samples are within these limits.

accuracy and precision

Mean recovery for recalibration standard

1st series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 94.7 ± 10.6 % (n = 10)

Zn (213.857 nm): 104.0 ± 44.4 % (n = 10)

2nd series:

Fe (240.489 nm): 91.2 ± 3.9 % (n = 4)

3rd series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 101.8 ± 6.0 % (n = 8)

Zn (202.548 nm): 85.7 ± 1.0 % (n = 8)

4th series:

Fe (239.563 nm): 95.9 ± 2.0 % (n = 4)

5th series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 99.7 ± 2.6 % (n = 7)

Zn (202.548 nm): 104.2 ± 10.9 % (n = 7)

Diluted to

5 μg Fe/L,

5 μg Zn/L

The increased standard deviation in the 5th series for Zn might be due to a contamination with ubiquitous Zn; one sample is not within 100 ± 15 %. Not critical > 60% of all QA/QC samples are within these limits.

accuracy and precision

Mean recovery for recalibration standard

3rd series:

Fe (259.940 nm): 97.7 ± 0.6 % (n = 3)

Zn (202.548 nm): 94.3 ± 0.3 % (n = 3)

Diluted to 50 μg Fe/L 50 μg Zn/L
trueness

Mean recoveries of fortified samples:

Fe: 81.8 – 109.6 %

Zn: 84.0 – 164.9 %

In sample fortification from the 1st and the 5th measurement series there was obviously a mistake in sample preparation because the recoveries are not all within 100 ± 15 %. This is not critical, the series are valid because > 60 % of all QA/QC samples are within these limits. This approach is according to internal SOPs for GLP and accreditation according to ISO 17025

Recoveries of fortified samples Iron (values were rounded, internal calculations were performed with more digits)

 

measured Fe

[μg/L]

calculated Fe

after addition

[μg/L]

Recovery

[μg Fe/L]

Recovery

[%]

1st series 1 mL of sample + 4 mL of 5 μg Fe/L

vessel 4, sample a after 2h

<LOD

4.000

4.148

103.7

vessel 4, sample a after 6h

<LOD

4.000

4.255

106.4

vessel 4, sample a after 1d

<LOD

4.000

4.305

107.6

vessel 4, sample a after 4d

<LOQ

4.000

4.214

105.3

vessel 4, sample a after 7d

<LOD

4.000

4.127

103.2

vessel 4, sample a after 14d

0.914

4.183

4.583

109.6

vessel 4, sample a after 21d

<LOQ

4.000

4.266

106.7

vessel 4, sample a after 28d

<LOD

4.000

4.182

104.6

2nd series 2 mL of sample + 3 mL of 75 μg Fe/L

vessel 4

95.64

83.254

84.302

101.3

4th series 2 mL of sample + 3 mL of 75 μg Fe/L

vessel 1

201.213

60.243

61.925

102.8

5th series 1 mL of sample + 4 mL of 50 μg Fe/L

vessel 1, sample a after 2h

1.595

40.319

34.124

84.6

vessel 1 sample a after 6h

<LOD

40.000

33.185

83.0

vessel 1, sample a after 1d

<LOQ

40.000

32.902

82.3

vessel 1, sample a after 4d

<LOQ

40.000

32.991

82.5

vessel 1, sample a after 7d

22.402

44.480

36.867

82.9

vessel 1, sample a after 14d

<LOD

40.000

32.735

81.8

vessel 1, sample a after 21d

<LOD

40.000

32.923

82.3

vessel 1, sample a after 28d

<LOD

40.000

32.895

82.2

Recoveries of fortified samples Zinc (values were rounded, internal calculations were performed with more digits)

 

measured Zn

[μg/L]

calculated Zn

after addition

[μg/L]

Recovery

[μg Zn/L]

Recovery

[%]

1st series 1 mL of sample + 4 mL of 5 μg Zn/L

vessel 4, sample a after 2h

1.217

4.243

6.706

158.0

vessel 4, sample a after 6h

1.539

4.308

6.921

160.7

vessel 4, sample a after 1d

1.881

4.376

7.012

160.2

vessel 4, sample a after 4d

1.449

4.290

6.860

159.9

vessel 4, sample a after 7d

1.564

4.313

6.884

159.6

vessel 4, sample a after 14d

2.386

4.477

7.381

164.9

vessel 4, sample a after 21d

2.911

4.582

6.984

152.4

vessel 4, sample a after 28d

2.716

4.543

7.245

159.5

5th series 1 mL of sample + 4 mL of 50 μg Zn/L

vessel 1, sample a after 2h

2.110

40.422

34.249

84.7

vessel 1 sample a after 6h

1.360

40.272

34.518

85.7

vessel 1, sample a after 1d

0.696

40.139

34.015

84.7

vessel 1, sample a after 4d

1.244

40.249

34.118

84.8

vessel 1, sample a after 7d

2.573

40.515

34.258

84.6

vessel 1, sample a after 14d

1.752

40.350

33.981

84.2

vessel 1, sample a after 21d

10.927

42.185

34.295

81.3

vessel 1, sample a after 28d

1.767

40.353

34.261

84.9

Conclusions:
The transformation/dissolution test (OECD Series on Testing and Assessment Number 29, 2001) of "Magnesium ferrite " at a loading of 1 mg/L at pH 6 and 8, performed for 28d, resulted in Fe concentrations below the LOD/LOQ and maximum Zn concentrations of 2.75 µg/L (pH = 6, 7d). Thus, the extent to which "Magnesium ferrite " can produce soluble available ionic and other metal-bearing species in aqueous media is limited.

Data source

Materials and methods

Results and discussion

Applicant's summary and conclusion