Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14 Jan 2015 to 06 Mar 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: study according to the guidelines under GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diethyl allylphosphonate
EC Number:
619-646-5
Cas Number:
1067-87-4
Molecular formula:
C7H15O3P
IUPAC Name:
Diethyl allylphosphonate
Test material form:
other: liquid
Details on test material:
Identification: Diethyl Allylphosphonate
Appearance/Physical State: Clear colorless liquid
Storage Conditions: Room temperature in the dark

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: CBA/CaCrl
- Source: Charles River (UK), Kent, UK
- Age at study initiation: 8-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 15 - 23 g,
- Housing: individually in solid-floor polypropylene cages
- Diet: 2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet ad libitum
- Water: tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 25°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): ca 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
0, 25, 50 and 100%
No. of animals per dose:
4/dose
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- dose: 25, 50 and 100%
- Irritation: none
- Lymph node proliferation response: no increase of ear thickness > 25% at 25, 50 and 100%
- Toxicity: none

MAIN STUDY
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Exposure during 3 consecutive days at the dorsal site of the ears with test substance or vehicle (25 uL). On day 6 3H-methyl thymidine(20 μCi/mouse) was injected in the tail vein. Five hours thereafter mice were killed and draining auricular lymph nodes were pooled per dose group and assessed for 3HTdR after 18 hours incubation at 4°C using a Beckman LS6500 scintillation system. The EC3 value is calculated based on the results at the different tested concentrations.

EXAMINATIONS
Clinical signs: twice daily on day 1-3, daily on day 3-6
Body weights: prior to administration on day 1, and prior to termination at day 6

ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: a threefold or greater increase in 3HTdR incorporation compared to control values (expressed as DPM/min).
Statistics:
NA

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde, tech., 85% showed a SI of 5.45 in positive control study at a 25% concentration in acetone/olive oil 4:1.

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: at 25, 50 and 100 % < three fold increase compared to vehicle controls

Any other information on results incl. tables


Concentration (% w/w) in acetone/

olive oil 4:1

dpm (pooled)

dpm/Node

Stimulation Index

Result

Vehicle

12358.39

1544.80

NA

NA

25

15138.14

1892.27

1.22

Negative

50

18755.79

2344.47

1.52

Negative

100

14790.53

1848.82

1.20

Negative

No effects on bodyweight or clinical signs

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The test substance is considered not sensitizing to the skin
Executive summary:

Exposure of 4 mice/ treatment during 3 consecutive days at the dorsal site of the ears with test substance (25, 50 or 100%) or vehicle. On day 6, 3H-methyl thymidine(20 μCi/mouse) was injected in the tail vein. Five hours thereafter mice were killed and draining auricular lymph nodes were pooled per dose group and assessed for 3HTdR after 18 hours incubation at 4°C using a Beckman LS6500 scintillation system.

The stimulation index was < 3 at all dose levels. The test substance is considered not sensitizing to the skin.