Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Sensitisation data (human)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
other: human patch test data collection
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Remarks:
Bias-positive: patients of dermatologists or dermal clinics are a cohort preselected for having a problem with the skin, so that no valid assessment of actual prevalence can be done.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Screening for contact allergy to artificial nails
Author:
Constandt L, Hecke EV, Naeyaert JM, Goossens A
Year:
2005
Bibliographic source:
Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52: 7 3-77

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
EC Number:
212-782-2
EC Name:
2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
Cas Number:
868-77-9
Molecular formula:
C6H10O3
IUPAC Name:
2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
Specific details on test material used for the study:
2% in pet

Method

Type of population:
occupational
Ethical approval:
not applicable
Subjects:
The population tested comprised 27 patients (26 women and 1 man), all in contact with artificial nails. Of them, 16 were professional beauticians - all had contact with nail tips, gel and/or acrylic nails, glue and nail lacquer. 11 were customers - some had used only gel nails, some only acrylic nails, whereas others had used both types.
A not further specified group of them of 12 patients was tested commercial test series.
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
12 patients were tested with various substances, 9 with the complete Chemotechnique (Malmö, Sweden) printing series (24 acrylic compounds), 7 with ethyl cyanoacrylate, 5 with a small series of 5 acrylics (MMA, 2-HEMA, EGDMA, BIS-GMA and UEDMA; and 1 with 2-HEMA only.
HEMA was tested at 2% in petrolatum.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
In a series of patients known to be exposed to artificial nails 6/11 (> 56%) subjects patch tested with HPMA were positive.

Any other information on results incl. tables

In the same investigations 27/29 tested with HEMA were positive, 4 of 21 tested with methyl methacrylate were positive, and 2 of 13 reacted to ethyl methacrylate.

Applicant's summary and conclusion