Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-299-8 | CAS number: 105-45-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The test item MAA was tested for skin and irritation on rabbits. In the key study according to OECD Guideline 404 (Acute dermal irritation / corrosion) similar or equivalent to EU Method B.4. The test item was not irritant to the skin of the rabbit and no corrosive effects were noted. In the key study according to OECD Guideline 405 (Acute eye irritation / corrosion) similar or equivalent to EU Method B.5), MAA showed severe irritating effects on cornea, conjunctiva and iris. Opacity of the cornea persisted in one animal until the end of the observation period of 21 days. Based on these effects. MAA has to be classified as severe eye-irritant - Category 1 (irreversible effect on the eye). There is no data available on respiratory irritation. However, there is no indication for respiratory irritation from handling and use.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- May 1983
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: study performed in accordance with the corresponding OECD-/EU-testing guidelines
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- number of animals: 3
- Weight at study initiation: 2200-2600 mg/kg
- Housing: single housing - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 ml test item was applied on a 2.5 x 2.5 cm patch
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- Observation 30 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after removal of patch
- Number of animals:
- 3 animals
- Details on study design:
- no data
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.22
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Only very slight erythema in all animals and very slight oedema in one animal were observed. 2 out of three animals showed a slight redness of the application site 30 minutes after removal of the patch. All findings were completely reversible within 48 hours.
- Other effects:
- None
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The substance was classified as non-irritant to skin.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed in 1983 under GLP according to OECD 404. Three albino rabbits were treated semi-occlusive with 0.5 ml test item was applied on a 2.5 x 2.5 cm patch. Observation times were 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patch. Only very slight erythema in all animals and very slight oedema in one animal were observed. 2 out of three animals showed a slight redness of the application site 30 minutes after removal of the patch. All findings were completely reversible within 48 hours. Therefore, MAA is not irritating to rabbit skin.
Reference
The results are summarized below:
Observation |
Mean values over 24, 48 & 72 hours |
Mean value |
||
No.1 |
No.2 |
No.3 |
||
Erythema |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0 |
0.2 |
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: study performed in accordance with the corresponding OECD-/EU-testing guidelines
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- number of animals: 3
- Weight at study initiation: 2200-2600 mg/kg
- Housing: single housing - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Amount applied: 0.1 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Duration of treatment was 24 hours
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Obervations were done at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7, 14 and 21 days after application
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 animals were used in this study
- Details on study design:
- The treated eyes were rinsed 24 hours after application.
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.9
- Max. score:
- 2.3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: cornea opacity with vascularization
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.3
- Max. score:
- 2.7
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.8
- Max. score:
- 2.3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The test item showed severe irritating effects in this test. The effects on conjunctiva (chemosis and redness) and on iris were found to be reversible within 21 days after treatment. The cornea opacity incl. vascularization observed in one animal persisted in one animal until the end of the observation period and was therefore not reversible.
- Other effects:
- Strong clear or slimy secretion was noted in the treated eyes of all animals up to 72 hours after application. The animal with irreversible opacity of thecornea showed also vascularization from day 7 until the end of the observation period of 21 days.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The test item is severely irritating and caused irreversible effects on the cornea. Therefore, it has to be classified as Category 1 eye-irritant.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed in 1983 under GLP according to OECD 405. Three albino rabbits were treated; 0.1 ml test item was applied into the conjunctival sac of the eye. Observation times were 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7, 14 and 21 days after treatment .
The test item showed severe irritating effects in this test. The effects on conjunctiva (chemosis and redness) and on iris were found to be reversible within 21 days after treatment. The cornea opacity incl. vascularization observed in one animal persisted in one animal until the end of the observation period and was therefore not reversible. In conclusion, MAA needs to be classified as Category 1 eye-irritant.
Reference
See table above.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Key – Skin irritation
A study was performed in 1983 as GLP-study according to OECD 404. Three albino rabbits were treated semi-occlusive with 0.5 ml test item was applied on a 2.5 x 2.5 cm patch. Observation times were 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patch. Only very slight erythema in all animals and very slight oedema in one animal were observed. 2 out of three animals showed a slight redness of the application site 30 minutes after removal of the patch. All findings were completely reversible within 48 hours. Therefore, MAA is not irritating to rabbit skin.
Supporting – Skin irritation
Another study was performed in 1974, following the DOT (Transport Classification) Guidelines. A couple of substances were tested in one study. The intact and abraded skin of 138 albino rabbits was employed for this study. A series of 6 rabbits was used for testing each substance. The patches consisted of 1.5 inch x 1.5 inch 12 ply gauze squares. The patches were secured to the area by thin bands of adhesive tape (occlusive application). The material to be tested (0.5 ml, was introduced beneath the patch. The entire trunks of the animals were then wrapped in clear plastic trunk bands. Only very slight erythema (score 1) was noted in all 6 animals 4h hours after removal of the patch. No oedema were observed. These findings were completely reversible within 24 hours. MAA is considered to be not irritating to rabbit skin.
Key - Eye irritation
The study was performed in 1983 under GLP according to OECD 405. Three albino rabbits were treated; 0.1 ml test item was applied into the conjunctival sac of the eye. Observation times were 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7, 14 and 21 days after treatment . The test item showed severe irritating effects in this test. The effects on conjunctiva (chemosis and redness) and on iris were found to be reversible within 21 days after treatment. The cornea opacity incl. vascularization observed in one animal persisted in one animal until the end of the observation period and was therefore not reversible. In conclusion, MAA needs to be classified as Category 1 eye-irritant.
Waiver - Respiratory irritation
There is no data available on respiratory irritation.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Guideline study; Klimisch 1
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Guideline study; Klimisch 1
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: slightly irritating
Effects on eye irritation: highly irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
The skin irritation study did not reveal any irritating effects, therefore MAA is not irritant to rabbit skin. The eye irritation test showed severe irritating effects on cornea, conjunctiva and iris. Opacity of the cornea persisted in one animal until the end of the observation period of 21 days. Based on these effects. MAA has to be classified as severe eye-irritant - Category 1 (irreversible effect on the eye).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.