Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

There were no skin sensitisation study identified for alkenes, C6. Therefore, a read-across skin sensitisation study was identified, in which SHOP C68 was administered to 20 test and 10 control Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (Rees, 1996). The following doses were selected based on a range-finding experiment: 50% in paraffin oil for the intradermal induction; 100% for the topical induction; and 100% and 30% in paraffin oil for the challenge phase. During the challenge phase, 16 test animals and 4 control animals exhibited a positive response to 100% SHOP C68. At 30% SHOP C68, 5 test animals and no control animals exhibited a positive response. Only one test animal showed a positive response to paraffin oil alone during the challenge phase.

Based on these responses, a re-challenge was conducted with 50% SHOP C68. Two test animals and 1 control test animals exhibited a positive response. Again, one test animal showed a positive response to paraffin oil during the challenge phase. Based on these results, SHOP C68 was not determined to be a skin sensitiser.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
A read-across skin sensitisation study (OECD 406) was identified from alkenes, C6-8 that showed no evidence of sensitisation in guinea pigs. Alkenes, C6 are not dermal sensitisers and contain no chemical alerts for respiratory sensitisation.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

Not expected to cause respiratory sensitisation based on results of skin sensitisation testing and an absence of reactive chemical alerts.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
Not expected to cause respiratory sensitisation based on results of skin sensitisation testing and an absence of reactive chemical alerts.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Negative results from a skin sensitisation study with alkenes, C6-8 (structural analogues) were read-across to alkenes C6. It was therefore inferred that alkenes, C6 would also not be a skin sensitizer. Therefore, alkenes, C6 do not meet the criteria for classification as a dermal sensitizer under EU Dangerous Substances Directive 67/548/EEC or CLP EU Regulation 1272/2008.

 

There are no data available for respiratory sensitisation for isomerised olefins; alpha, internal, linear and branched – multiple carbon number including alkenes, C6. However, alkenes, C6 are not expected to cause respiratory sensitisation based on results of skin sensitisation and an absence of reactive chemical alerts.