Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-514-3 | CAS number: 1471312-26-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP - Guideline study. According to the ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-ethylhexyl lactate
- EC Number:
- 228-503-2
- EC Name:
- 2-ethylhexyl lactate
- Cas Number:
- 6283-86-9
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-ethylhexyl 2-hydroxypropanoate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Analytical purity: 99%
- Lot/batch No.: 0805000655
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: culture medium: Culture medium consisted of RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen Corporation), supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated (56°C; 30 min) foetal calf serum (Invitrogen Corporation), L-glutamine (2mM) (Invitrogen Corporation), penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 U/mL, respectively) (Invitrogen Corporation) and 30 U/mL heparin (Sigma, Zwijdrecht, The Netherlands).
Lymphocytes cultures: Whole blood (0.4 mL) treated with heparin was added to 5 mL or 4.8 mL culture medium (in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively). Per culture 0.1 mL (9 mg/mL) phytohaemagglutinin (Remel, Europe Ltd., United Kingdom) was added.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital and β-naphtoflavone induced rat liver S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose range finding test: 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL (3 h exposure time) and 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000 and 2023 µg/ml (24 and 48 h exposure time)
Main assay:
First cytogenicity assay: with and without S9-mix: 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 235, 270 and 300 µg/mL culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time)
Cytogenetic assay 1A: with S9-mix: 150, 200, 250, 270, 275, 280, 285, 290, 295 and 300 µg/mL culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time).
Second cytogenetic assay: Without S9-mix: 30, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 275 and 300 µg/mL culture medium (24 and 48 h exposure time, 24 and 48 h fixation time) and with S9-mix: 150, 200, 250, 270, 280, 290, 300, 310, 320 and 330 µg/mL culture medium (3 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time).
Cytogenicity assay 2A: Without S9-mix: 150, 200, 250, 300, 310, 320, 330, 340 and 350 µg/mL culture medium (48 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time)
The following doses were selected for scoring of chromosome aberrations:
Without S9-mix: 100, 225 and 250 µg/mL culture medium (24 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time)
Without S9-mix: 150, 250 and 300 µg/mL culture medium (48 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time)
With S9-mix: 150, 300 and 330 µg/mL culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO. PURASOLV®EHL dilutions were used within 2.5 h after preparation. The final concentration of the solvent in the culture medium was 1.0% (v/v).
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- -S9: mitomycin C; +S9: cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION:
- Exposure duration: dose range finding test: 3 h, 24 h and 48 h in the absence of S9-mix or 3 h in the presence of S9-mix. First cytogenetic assay: 3h in the presence and absence of S9-mix. Second cytogenetic assay: 24 h and 48 h in the absence of S9-mix and 3 h in the presence of S9-mix.
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): Dose range finding test: 24 h (3 h and 24 h exposure) or 48 h (48 h exposure). First cytogenetic assay: 24 h. Second cytogenetic assay: 24 h (24h exposure) or 48 h (3 and 48 h exposure).
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colchicine (0.5 µg/mL medium) (Acros Organics, Belgium)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): slides were stained for 10-30 min with 5% (v/v) Giemsa (Merck) solution in tap water
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) it induced a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
b) a statistically significant and biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if none of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
The preceding criteria were not absolute and other modifying factors might have entered into the final evaluation decision. - Statistics:
- The incidence of aberrant cells (cells with one or more chromosome aberrations, gaps included or excluded) for each exposure group outside the laboratory historical control data range was compared to that of the solvent control using Chi-square statistics.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: the highest tested concentration was determined by the solubility of the test substance in the culture medium at the 3 h exposure time. At the 24 and 48 h exposure time, the test substance was tested beyond the limit of solubility to obtain adequate toxicity data. Based on the results of the dose range finding test an appropriate range of dose levels was chosen for the cytogenetic assays considering the highest dose level had an inhibition of the mitotic index of 50% or greater whereas the mitotic index of the lowest dose level was approximately the same as the mitotic index of the solvent control.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
First cytogenicity assay: in the presence of S9-mix, no appropriate dose level could be selected for scoring of chromosome aberrations since at a concentration of 270 µg/mL no cytotoxicity was observed (9%), whereas the next higher concentration of 300 µg/mL was too toxic for scoring (79%). This part of the experiment was repeated (Cytogenetic assay 1A).
The following dose levels were selected for scoring to chromosome aberration:
Without S9-mix: 0, 200, 270 and 300 µg/ml culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time)
With S9-mix: 0, 150, 270 and 280 µg/ml culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time)
Second cytogenetic assay:
In the absence of S9-mix, at the 48 h continuous exposure time, no appropriate dose levels could be selected for scoring of chromosome aberrations since no concentration was available with the appropriate cytotoxicity greater than 50%. This part of the experiment was repeated (Cytogenetic assay 2A).
The following doses were selected for scoring of chromosome aberrations:
Without S9-mix: 0, 100, 225 and 250 µg/ml culture medium (24 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time)
Without S9-mix: 0, 150, 250 and 300 µg/ml culture medium (48 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time)
With S9-mix: 0, 150, 300 and 330 µg/ml culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time) - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
All results are presented in Tables 1 -10 in the attached background material (NOTOX Project 494584).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative - Executive summary:
- In a mammalian cell cytogenetic assay (chromosome aberration), primary peripheral human lymphocytes cultures were exposed to the PURASOLV®EHL (2-ethylhexyl-S-lactate, purity 99%) at concentrations of 0, 100, 150, 200, 225, 250, 270 and 300 µg/mL without metabolic activation and 0, 150, 270, 280, 300 and 330 µg/mL with metabolic activation (phenobarbital and β-naphtoflavone induced rat liver S9 -mix). The test substance was tested up to cytotoxic concentrations. Positive controls induced the appropriate response. There was no evidence of chromosome aberration induced over background. Based on the results of the study, PURASOLV®EHL is not considered clastogenic in human lymphocytes.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.