Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
April 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-{[(6-{2,4,6-trioxo-3,5-bis[6-({[4-(prop-2-enoyloxy)butoxy]carbonyl}amino)hexyl]-1,3,5-triazinan-1-yl}hexyl)carbamoyl]oxy}butyl prop-2-enoate
EC Number:
929-915-1
IUPAC Name:
4-{[(6-{2,4,6-trioxo-3,5-bis[6-({[4-(prop-2-enoyloxy)butoxy]carbonyl}amino)hexyl]-1,3,5-triazinan-1-yl}hexyl)carbamoyl]oxy}butyl prop-2-enoate
Test material form:
solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 16/0438-1, Batch 360-71-3

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Remarks:
CBA/CaOlaHsd
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Envigo RMS B.V., Inc. Postbus 6174, 5960 AD Horst, The Netherlands
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: not specified
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 17.9 - 19.4 g (pretest), 17.9 - 20.6 g (main test)
- Housing: Polycarbonate cages type MII with mesh wire tops (Becker Co.)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Kliba mouse/rat maintenance diet "GLP" supplied by Provimi Kliba SA; ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before the first test substance application

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
- IN-LIFE DATES: From: Jan 2017 To: April 2017

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
methyl ethyl ketone
Concentration:
10, 25, 50%
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
MAIN STUDY
- Irritation/systemic toxicity: Obvious signs of systemic toxicity and/or local inflammation at the application sites were noted for each animal in the raw data.
- Mortality: A check for moribund and dead animals was made twice each workday (beginning and end) and once on Saturdays, Sundays and on public holidays.
- Form of application: Epicutaneous application is simulating dermal contact with the compound which is possible to occur under practical use conditions.
- Application volume: 25µl per ear
- Site of application: dorsal part of both ears
- Frequency of application: 3 consecutive applications (day 0-2) to the same application site
- Body weight determination: Individual body weights on day 0 prior to the first application and on day 5 prior to the sacrifice of the animals.
- 3G Thymidine injection: On study day 5, 20µCi 3H-thymidine in 250µl sterile saline were injected into the tail vein of the mice.
- Section: The animals were sacrificed on study day 5 about 5h after 3H-thymidine injection by cervical dislocation under Isoflurane anesthesia.
- Ear weight: Immediately after the death of each animal, a circular piece of tissue was punched out of the apical part of each ear of all animals. The weight of the pooled punches was determined for each animal. These measurements serve for detecting a potential inflammatory ear swelling.
- Lymph nodes: Immeadiately after removal of the ear punches, the left and right auricular lymph nodes from both sides was determined for each animal.
- Cell count: After weight determination, the pooled lymph nodes of each animal were stored in PBS in an ice water bath until further preparation. A single cell suspension was prepared as soon as possible after dissection by carefully passing the lymph nodes through an iron mesh into 6ml PBS. For determination of cell counts, an aliquot of each suspension was further diluted and cell count was determined using a cell counter.
- Measuremtn of 3H-thymidine: The remaining cell suspensions were washed with PBS and precipitated with 5% TCA. Each precipitate was transferred to scintillation fluid and incorporation of 3H-thymidine into the cells was measured in a ß-scintillation counter.

ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: A test item is regarded as a sensitizer in the LLNA if exposure to at least one concentration of the test item results in an incorporation of 3H-thymidine at least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in control mice as indicated by the stimulation index (SI ≥ 3.0). However, the biological relevance of the obtained stimulation indices is considered in conjunction with the other assessed end points (i.e. lymph node cell counts, lymph node weights, ear weights). Hereby, the thresholds used for assessment of cell counts and ear weights are represented by stimulation indices (SI) of 1.5 and 1.25, respectively. If applicable, the EC (estimated concentration) leading to the respective SI values were
calculated by linear or semi-logarithmical regression between the data points directly below and above the SI if possible or by using the two nearest points below or above the SI.

Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
EC3
Remarks:
%
Value:
43.8
Test group / Remarks:
Mean
Parameter:
SI
Value:
3.63
Test group / Remarks:
50% in MEK (based on Thymidine incorporation)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Pre-Test / Irritation Screening:

No signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the pretest. At the tested concentrations, the animals did not show relevant signs of local irritation as confirmed by determination of the ear weights (compared to current vehicle values) and ear thickness measurements. At the 50% concentration, slight compound residues on the ear skin and/or slight pull out of hair at the head were noted during the observation period.

Main test:

When applied as 50% preparation in MEK, the test substance induced a biologically relevant (increase above the cut-off Stimulation Index of 3) and statistically significant increase of 3H-thymidine incorporation into the cells from the auricular lymph nodes. Concomitantly, the 50% test-substance preparation induced a biologically relevant and statistically significant response (increase to 1.5-fold or above of control value = stimulation index (SI) ≥ 1.5) in the auricular lymph node cell counts. In addition, a statistically significant and biologically relevant increase in lymph node weights was noted at the 50% concentration.

All test-substance concentrations did not cause biologically relevant increases (SI > 1.25) in ear weights demonstrating the absence of relevant ear skin irritation. However, a statistically significant increase in ear weights was noted at the 50% concentration but well below the cutoff value.

No relevant influence on the body weights was observed during the study.

No signs of systemic toxicity were noticed in all animals during general observation.

During the observation period very slight erythema and/or slight swelling of the ear skin were observed in all animals at the 50% and 25% concentrations. Slight compound residues were noted in all animals of the 50% concentration on study day 2, only.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
It is concluded that the test item exhibits a skin sensitizing potential in the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay under the test conditions chosen.
The threshold concentration for sensitization induction was >25% <50%. The EC 3 (estimated concentration that leads to the SI of 3.0) for 3H-thymidine incorporation and the EC 1.5 (estimated concentration that leads to the SI of 1.5) for cell count was calculated by linear regression from the results of these concentrations to be 43.8% and 40.9%, respectively.
Executive summary:

The skin sensitizing potential of the test item was assessed by using the radioactive Murine Local Lymph Node Assay. The assay simulates the induction phase for skin sensitization in mice. It determines the response of cells in the auricular lymph nodes to repeated application of the test substance to the dorsal skin of the ears. Groups of 5 female CBA/CaOlaHsd mice each were treated with 10%, 25% and 50% (w/w) preparations of the test substance in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) or with the vehicle alone. The highest test-substance concentration which could be technically used was a 50% test substance solution.

The study consisted of 3 test groups and 1 control group. Each test animal was treated with 25 μL per ear of the appropriate test-substance preparation applied to the dorsal surfaces of both ears on three consecutive days. The control group was treated with 25 μL per ear of the vehicle alone.

Three days after the last application, 20 μCi 3H-thymidine in 250 μL sterile saline were injected into the tail vein of the mice. About 5 hours after the 3H-thymidine injection, the mice were sacrificed and the auricular lymph nodes were removed. Lymph node response was evaluated by measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation (indicator of cell proliferation). Cell counts and weights of each animal’s pooled lymph nodes were also determined. In addition, a 0.8 cm diameter sample was punched out of the apical part of each ear and for each animal the weight of the pooled punches was determined to obtain an indication of possible skin irritation.

The mean stimulation indices (expressed as multiples of the vehicle control) for 3H-thymidine incorporation, cell count, lymph node weight and ear weight are summarized for each test group in the table below.

No signs of systemic toxicity were noticed in all animals during general observation. When applied as 50% preparation in MEK, the test substance induced a biologically relevant (increase above the cut-off Stimulation Index of 3) and statistically significant increase of 3H-thymidine incorporation into the cells from the auricular lymph nodes.

Concomitantly, the 50% test-substance preparation induced a biologically relevant and statistically significant response (increase to 1.5-fold or above of control value = stimulation index (SI) ≥ 1.5) in the auricular lymph node cell counts.

In addition, a statistically significant and biologically relevant increase in lymph node weights was noted at the 50% concentration.

All test-substance concentrations did not cause biologically relevant increases (SI > 1.25) in ear weights demonstrating the absence of relevant ear skin irritation. However, a statistically significant increase in ear weights was noted at the 50% concentration but well below the cutoff value.

In addition, very slight erythema and/or slight swelling of the ear skin were observed in all animals at the 50% and 25% concentrations during the observation period. Slight compound residues were noted in all animals of the 50% concentration on study day 2, only.

Thus, it is concluded that the test item exhibits a skin sensitizing potential in the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay under the test conditions chosen.

The threshold concentration for sensitization induction was >25% <50%. The EC 3 (estimated concentration that leads to the SI of 3.0) for 3H-thymidine incorporation and the EC 1.5 (estimated concentration that leads to the SI of 1.5) for cell count was calculated by linear regression from the results of these concentrations to be 43.8% and 40.9%, respectively.