Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
September 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: the ECVAM DB-ALM protocol 155: KeratinoSensTM
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
N/A
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
activation of keratinocytes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Apple, Malus sylvestris, ext.
EC Number:
286-475-7
EC Name:
Apple, Malus sylvestris, ext.
Cas Number:
85251-63-4
IUPAC Name:
Apple, Malus sylvestris, ext.
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

In vitro test system

Details on the study design:
Cells seeding (first day)

The cells were trypsinized according to the current working instruction IL 09. Cells suspension were adjusted to a density of 8.104 cells/ml in seeding medium. 125 µl of the cell suspension at 8.104 cells/ml (i.e. 104 cells per well) were distributed in three white plates for the induction measurement and two transparent plates to assess the cytotoxicity. The seeded plates were incubated 24 hours ± 1 hour at 37°C, 5% CO2.
Note: the H12 wells were left without cells and allowed the measurement of blanks.

Preparation of test item dilutions (second day)
Preparation of the test item stock solution:The test item was diluted in sterile water.The stock solution was prepared at 40 mg/ml (i.e. 4%).

Preparation of the positive control stock solution: The positive control was prepared at 200 mM in DMSO then diluted to the final concentration of 6.4 mM.

Preparation of the 100 X plate:A 100-fold concentrated dilutions serie was prepared in 96-well plate.

Test item
The test item was placed in one of the rows B to F.
100 µl of sterile water. were distributed from columns 1 to 11. 200 µl of the 40 mg/ml stock solution were placed in column 12 then the series dilutions were prepared by transferring 100 µl of the column 12 in the column 11 and so on until the column 1. Dilutions were mixed by repeated pipetting, at least 3 times, between each concentration.

Positive control
100 µl of DMSO were distributed in row G from columns 7 to 10. 200 µl of the 6.4 mM stock solution were placed in column 11 then the series dilutions were prepared by transferring 100 µl of the column 11 in the column 10 and so on until the column 7. Dilutions were mixed by repeated pipetting, at least 3 times, between each concentration.

Negative control
100 µl of DMSO were distributed in row G columns 1 to 6 and 12 and in the well H12.

Preparation of the 4 X dilution plate
The 100 X DMSO plate was diluted 25 fold in a new plate (4 X). For the test item, the level of the DMSO is adjusted to 1% final.

Contact between the cells and the test and reference items (second day)
In the 5 seeded plates, the medium was aspirated and replaced with 150 µl of treatment medium. Then the 4 X plate was replicated 5 times: 50 µl from the 4 X plate were placed in each of the three white plates and in the two transparent plates. The plates (1 X) were covered with an adhesive plastic foil to prevent evaporation and incubated for 48 hours ± 1 hour (37°C, 5% CO2).

Luciferase activity (day 4)
After 48 hours, the medium was aspirated and each well was gently washed once with 200 µl of PBS. Then 100 µl of luciferase substrate (luciferine + ATP + lysing agent) were then added in each well. The plates were incubated at least 15 minutes at room temperature to ensure cells lysis.
The plates were placed in the luminometer then the luciferase activity was measured with an integration time of 2 seconds.

Cell viability assessment with MTT method (day 4)
After 48 hours, the medium was aspirated and each well was gently washed once with 200 µl of PBS. Then, 225 µl of staining solution diluted at 0.6 mg/ml in treatment medium (from the 5mg/ml stock solution) were distributed in each well. The plates were covered with an adhesive plastic foil and incubated for 4 hours ± 30 minutes (37°C, 5% CO2).
After this contact time, the staining solution was eliminated and the cells were treated with 200 µl of 10% SDS one night (repetition 1) or a weekend (repetition 2) in the dark (37°C, 5% CO2). After a 10 minutes homogenization, the absorbances were measured at 540 nm.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
EC1.5 = 15.14
Imax = 3.94

In vitro / in chemico

Results
Key result
Parameter:
other: Luciferase induction
Value:
1.11
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: not sensitizer
Conclusions:
Under the retained experimental conditions, the test item may be classified as not sensitizer.
The test method KeratinoSens is considered scientifically valid to be used as part of an integrated approaches to testing and assessment, to support the identification of the sensitization potential of test item for hazard classification and labeling purposes.
Executive summary:

Under the retained experimental conditions, the test item may be classified as not sensitizer.

The test method KeratinoSens is considered scientifically valid to be used as part of an integrated approaches to testing and assessment, to support the identification of the sensitization potential of test item for hazard classification and labeling purposes.