Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-527-7 | CAS number: 12262-58-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental starting date: 23rd February 2015 Experimental completion date: 7th april 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of relevant results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Cyclohexanone, peroxide
- EC Number:
- 235-527-7
- EC Name:
- Cyclohexanone, peroxide
- Cas Number:
- 12262-58-7
- Molecular formula:
- Multi-constituent substance (equilibrium mixture of a number of cyclohexyl based organic peroxides, hydrogen peroxide, cyclohexanone and water)
- IUPAC Name:
- Peroxycyclohexanone
- Test material form:
- other: Liquid
- Details on test material:
- Identification: Cyclohexanone peroxide (CAS No.012262-58-7)
Batch: 1405426797
Purity: 33.9% Cyclohexanone peroxide (mixture of cyclohexyl peroxy components)
Expiry / Retest Date: 18 February 2016
Storage Conditions: Ambient 10 oC not to exceed 25 oC.
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase, TK +/- locus of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Cell Culture
The stocks of cells are stored in liquid nitrogen at approximately -196 °C. Cells were routinely cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with Glutamax-1 and HEPES buffer (20 mM) supplemented with Penicillin (100 units/mL), Streptomycin (100 µg/mL), Sodium pyruvate (1 mM), Amphotericin B (2.5 µg/mL) and 10% donor horse serum (giving R10 media) at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in air. The cells have a generation time of approximately 12 hours and were subcultured accordingly. RPMI 1640 with 20% donor horse serum (R20) and without serum (R0) are used during the course of the study. Master stocks of cells were tested and found to be free of mycoplasma.
Cell Cleansing
The TK +/- heterozygote cells grown in suspension spontaneously mutate at a low but significant rate. Before the stocks of cells were frozen they were cleansed of homozygous (TK -/-) mutants by culturing in THMG medium for 24 hours. This medium contained Thymidine (9 µg/mL), Hypoxanthine (15 µg/mL), Methotrexate (0.3 µg/mL) and Glycine (22.5 µg/mL). For the following 24 hours the cells were cultured in THG medium (i.e. THMG without Methotrexate) before being returned to R10 medium. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital/beta-naphthaflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 and 2: 0, 3.75, 7.5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 µg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- +S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- -S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Test Item Preparation
Following solubility checks performed in-house, the test item was accurately weighed and formulated in DMSO prior to serial dilutions being prepared. The test item had a molecular weight of 148.2. Therefore, the maximum dose level in the solubility test was set at 1482 µg/mL, the maximum recommended dose level, and no correction for the purity of the test item was applied. There was no marked change in pH when the test item was dosed into media and the osmolality did not increase by more than 50 mOsm (Scott et al. 1991). The pH and osmolality readings are in the following table:
Dose level
µg/mL 0 5.79 11.58 23.16 46.31 92.63 185.25 370.5 741 1482
pH 7.24 7.27 7.21 7.22 7.25 7.27 7.24 7.20 7.21 7.19
Osmolality
mOsm 457 461 - - - 473 - - 467 455
- Not required
No analysis was carried out to determine the homogeneity, concentration or stability of the test item formulation. The test item was formulated within two hours of it being applied to the test system. It is assumed that the formulation was stable for this duration. This is an exception with regard to GLP and has been reflected in the GLP compliance statement.
4.4 Control Preparation
Vehicle and positive controls were used in parallel with the test item. Solvent (DMSO) (CAS No. 67-68-5) treatment groups were used as the vehicle controls. Ethylmethanesulphonate (EMS) (CAS No. 62-50-0) Sigma batch BCBK5968V and BCBN1209V at 400 µg/mL was used as the positive control in the absence of metabolic activation. Cyclophosphamide (CP) (CAS No. 6055-19-2) Sigma-Aldrich batch MKBS0021V at 1.5 µg/mL was used as the positive control in the presence of metabolic activation. The positive controls were formulated in DMSO.
4.5 Microsomal Enzyme Fraction
PB/BNF S9 was prepared in-house on 23 November 2014 from the livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing approximately 250g. These had each received, orally, three consecutive daily doses of phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone (80/100 mg per kg per day) prior to S9 preparation on the fourth day. This procedure was designed and conducted to cause the minimum suffering or distress to the animals consistent with the scientific objectives and in accordance with the Harlan Laboratories Ltd, Shardlow, UK policy on animal welfare and the requirements of the United Kingdom’s Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012. The conduct of the procedure may be reviewed, as part of the Harlan Laboratories Ltd, Shardlow, UK Ethical Review Process. The S9 was stored at approximately 196 °C in a liquid nitrogen freezer.
S9-mix was prepared by mixing S9, NADP (5 mM), G-6-P (5 mM), KCl (33 mM) and MgCl2 (8 mM) in R0.
20% S9-mix (i.e. 2% final concentration of S9) was added to the cultures of the Preliminary Toxicity Test and of Experiments 1 and 2.
4.6 Preliminary Toxicity Test
A preliminary toxicity test was performed on cell cultures at 5 x 105 cells/mL, using a 4 hour exposure period both with and without metabolic activation (S9), and at 1.5 x 105 cells/mL using a 24-hour exposure period without S9. The dose range used in the preliminary toxicity test was 5.79 to 1482 µg/mL for all three of the exposure groups. Following the exposure period the cells were washed twice with R10, resuspended in R20 medium, counted and then serially diluted to 2 x 105 cells/mL, unless the mean cell count was less than 3 x 105 cells/mL in which case all the cells were maintained.
The cultures were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in air and sub-cultured after 24 hours by counting and diluting to 2 x 105 cells/mL, unless the mean cell count was less than 3 x 105 cells/mL in which case all the cells were maintained. After a further 24 hours the cultures were counted and then discarded. The cell counts were then used to calculate Suspension Growth (SG) values. The SG values were then adjusted to account for immediate post treatment toxicity, and a comparison of each treatment SG value to the concurrent vehicle control performed to give a percentage Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) value.
Results from the preliminary toxicity test were used to set the test item dose levels for the mutagenicity experiments. Maximum dose levels were selected using the following criteria:
i) Maximum recommended dose level, 5000 µg/mL or 10 mM.
ii) The presence of excessive precipitate where no test item-induced toxicity was observed.
iii) Test item-induced toxicity, where the maximum dose level used should produce 10 to 20% survival (the maximum level of toxicity required). This optimum upper level of toxicity was confirmed by an IWGT meeting in New Orleans, USA (Moore et al 2002).
4.7 Mutagenicity Test
4.7.1 Experiments 1 & 2
Several days before starting the experiment, an exponentially growing stock culture of cells was set up so as to provide an excess of cells on the morning of the experiment. The cells were counted and processed to give 1 x 106 cells/mL in 10 mL aliquots in R10 medium in sterile plastic universals. The treatments were performed in duplicate (A + B), both with and without metabolic activation (2% S9 final concentration) at eight dose levels of the test item (3.75 to 90 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation, and 7.5 to 180 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation), vehicle and positive controls. To each universal was added 2 mL of S9 mix if required, 0.2 mL of the treatment dilutions, (0.2 or 0.15 mL for the positive control) and sufficient R0 medium to bring the total volume to 20 mL.
The treatment vessels were incubated at 37 °C for 4 hours with continuous shaking using an orbital shaker within an incubated hood.
Experiment 2 was performed under the same conditions as Experiment 1 to clarify a suspected positive result. - Evaluation criteria:
- Please refer to "Any other information on materials and methods"
- Statistics:
- Please refer to "Any other information on materials and methods"
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- There was evidence of marked reductions in the Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) of cells treated with the test item when compared to the concurrent vehicle controls in all three of the exposure groups. The onset of test item-induced toxicity was sharp in all three of the exposure groups. A precipitate of the test item was observed at and above 741 µg/mL in both 4-hour exposure groups. Based on the %RSG values observed, the maximum dose levels in the subsequent Mutagenicity Test were limited by test item induced toxicity.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Experiment 1
There was evidence of marked toxicity following exposure to the test item in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, as indicated by the RTG and %RSG values (Tables 3 and 6). There was also evidence of reductions in viability (%V), therefore indicating that residual toxicity had occurred in both of the exposure groups (Tables 3 and 6). Based on the RTG and %RSG values observed, optimum levels of toxicity were considered to have been achieved in the presence of metabolic activation (Tables 3 and 6). The toxicity observed at 90 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation exceeded the upper acceptable limit of 90%. Therefore, this dose level was excluded from the statistical analysis. Several vital dose levels around optimum toxicity exhibited excessive heterogeneity which was believed to be caused by test item induced cytotoxicity, therefore these dose levels were excluded from statistical analysis. Acceptable levels of toxicity were seen with both positive control substances (Tables 3 and 6).
The vehicle controls had mutant frequency values that were considered acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. In the presence of metabolic activation the vehicle control mutant frequency was marginally high but still considered to be acceptable. Both of the positive controls produced marked increases in the mutant frequency per viable cell indicating that the test system was operating satisfactorily and that the metabolic activation system was functional (Tables 3 and 6).
The test item induced both statistically significant and dose related (linear-trend) increases in the mutant frequency x 10-6per viable cell, in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation. In the absence of metabolic activation, it should be noted that the highest MF values observed were either excluded due to excessive heterogeneity or excessive toxicity, however the GEF value was significantly exceeded in these dose levels giving a cause for concern. In the presence of metabolic activation the highest MF value observed was just outside the acceptable limit for toxicity where the GEF value was markedly exceeded, however the dose level with optimum toxicity had a statistically significant increase in MF and the GEF was exceeded. With the data considered and issues with heterogeneity it was decided to perform an Experiment 2 with the same conditions as Experiment 1 to clarify the result. Precipitate of the test item was not observed at any of the dose levels during the course of the experiment.
The numbers of small and large colonies and their analysis are presented in Tables 4 and 7. In both the absence and presence of metabolic activation the colony formation was predominantly due to small colonies, indicating a possible contribution to clastogenic activity.
Experiment 2
As was seen previously, there was evidence of marked toxicity in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, as indicated by the RTG and %RSG values (Tables 9 and 12). The toxicity observed was very similar to the values observed in Experiment 1. There was also evidence of a modest reduction in viability (%V) in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, therefore indicating that residual toxicity had occurred (Tables 9 and 12). Based on the RTG and %RSG values observed, optimum levels of toxicity were considered to have been achieved in both the absence and presence metabolic activation. In the presence of metabolic activation, the 180 µg/mL dose level was plated for viability and 5-TFT resistance as sufficient cells were available at the time of plating. However, this dose level was later excluded from statistical analysis due to excessive toxicity. Acceptable levels of toxicity were seen with both positive control substances (Tables 9 and 12).
The vehicle (solvent) controls had mutant frequency values that were considered acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. Both of the positive controls produced marked increases in the mutant frequency per viable cell indicating that the test system was operating satisfactorily and that the metabolic activation system was functional (Tables 9 and 12).
The positive response observed in Experiment 1 was reproduced without any issues with heterogeneity in Experiment 2. The test item induced both statistically significant and dose related (linear-trend) increases in the mutant frequency x 10-6per viable cell in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation (Tables 9 and 12). The GEF value was exceeded at several cytotoxic dose levels including optimum toxicity in both exposure conditions. Therefore, the effect was considered to be toxicologically significant. The test item was now considered to have been adequately tested. Precipitate of the test item was not observed at any of the dose levels during the course of the experiment.
The numbers of small and large colonies and their analysis are presented in Tables 10 and 13. In both the absence and presence of metabolic activation the colony formation was predominantly due to small colonies, indicating a possible contribution to clastogenic activity.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive
The test item induced toxicologically significant and dose related increases in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation in both experiments and is therefore considered to be mutagenic under the conditions of the test - Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was conducted according to a method that was designed to assess the potential mutagenicity of the test item on the thymidine kinase, TK +/-, locus of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line. The method was designed to be compatible with the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No.476 "In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests" adopted 21 July 1997, Method B17 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008, the US EPA OPPTS 870.5300 Guideline, and in alignment with the Japanese MITI/MHW guidelines for testing of new chemical substances.
Methods…….
Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, L5178Y TK +/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cells (heterozygous at the thymidine kinase locus) were treated with the test item at eight dose levels in duplicate, together with vehicle (DMSO), and positive controls using 4-hour exposure groups both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (2% S9). In Experiment 2, the same experimental conditions as Experiment 1 were used to clarify a suspected positive result obtained in Experiment 1.
The dose range of test item used in the main test was selected following the results of a preliminary toxicity test. The dose levels plated out for viability and expression of mutant colonies were as follows:
Experiments 1 & 2
Group
Concentration of Cyclohexanone peroxide (CAS No. 012262-58-7) (µg/mL) plated for viability and mutant frequency
4-hour without S9
7.5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90
4-hour with S9 (2%)
30, 45, 90, 120, 150, 180
Results…………
The maximum dose levels used in the Mutagenicity Test were limited by test item-induced toxicity. Precipitate of the test item was not observed at any of the dose levels during the course of the Mutagenicity Test. The vehicle controls (DMSO) had mutant frequency values that were considered acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. The positive control treatment induced marked increases in the mutant frequency indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolizing system.
The test item induced toxicologically significant and dose related increases in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation in both experiments. The GEF value was markedly exceeded and the mutagenic response was reproducible in both exposure groups. The colony formation was predominantly small colonies indicative of a possible contribution to clastogenic activity.
Conclusion
The test item induced toxicologically significant and dose related increases in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation in both experiments and is therefore considered to be mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.