Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Toxicity to reproduction

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to reproduction
Remarks:
other: chronic two-year study
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1957
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
No GLP, short documentation, unclear number of animals examined histopathologically, only one dose for females, purity not specified. Read-across justification: The available toxicological data for the target and source substances is outlined in the data matrix (Annex I). The toxicological properties of the target substance are related mainly to acetic acid/acetate since the anhydride components of the substance are hydrolytically unstable. When the target substance comes in contact with water or moisture a complete hydrolysis will take place to form no other hydrolysis products than acetic acid/acetate and adipic acid. Thus, the use of data from acetic acid and adipic acid is justified to evaluate toxicological properties of the target substance. Furthermore, data from acetic anhydride is used in the assessment. Experimental data obtained with the source substances indicate that the substances has low oral (LD50 > 1780 – 3310 mg/kg bw) and inhalation (LC50 1680 - 7700 mg/m3) acute toxicity. Furthermore, the acetic acid and acetic anhydride are irritating to skin at concentration < 25% and corrosive to skin at ≥ 25%. Acetic anhydride and acetic acid are not tested for sensitisation due corrosive properties; adipic acid did not show any evidence of sensitising in an animal study. The source substances did not show positive response in genetic toxicity studies available. Repeated toxicity studies via oral route conducted for acetic acid showed NOAEL values ≥ 210 mg kg bw/day and via inhalation route for acetic anhydride 4.2 mg/m3.. Reproduction toxicity studies conducted for acetic acid did not show any adverse effects on reproduction at the highest concentration tested (1600 mg/kg bw/day).

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Safety of adipic acid as compared with citric and tartaric acid.
Author:
Horn HJ, Holland EG, Hazleton LW
Year:
1957
Bibliographic source:
Agricult. Food Chem. 5, 759-762.

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Rats were fed either the basal laboratory diet, or the basal diet to which adipic acid was added. Body weights, food consumption, and general appearance were recorded weekly throughout the experimental period. Whenever possible, gross autopsy was performed on those animals that died during the course of the experiment. After two years, surviving rat were weighed, killed, and examined grossly. Organs were weighed. Microscopic examination of several organs, including testis or ovaries and uterus was performed on a representative number of animals.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Adipic acid
EC Number:
204-673-3
EC Name:
Adipic acid
Cas Number:
124-04-9
Molecular formula:
C6H10O4
IUPAC Name:
adipic acid
Details on test material:
Test substance purity not specified

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Carworth Farm strain
Sex:
male/female

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: feed
Details on mating procedure:
no mating
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Exposure period: 2 years
Frequency of treatment:
diet ad libitum
Details on study schedule:
2 year cancer study
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
male rats: 0, 0.1, 1, 3, and 5%; (ca. 75, 750, 2250, 3750 mg/kg bw/day) female rats: 0, 1%; (ca. 750 mg/kg bw/day)
Basis:

No. of animals per sex per dose:
19-20 per sex and dose
Control animals:
yes

Results and discussion

Results: P0 (first parental generation)

General toxicity (P0)

Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
eight gains for the male rats receiving 3 or 5% adipic acid was significantly less than the controls.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
eight gains for the male rats receiving 3 or 5% adipic acid was significantly less than the controls.
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
histopathologic examination of the testes, ovaries and uterus revealed no evidence of an adverse effect on the reproductive organs.

Effect levels (P0)

open allclose all
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
750 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
3 750 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Sex:
male

Overall reproductive toxicity

Reproductive effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In an two-years feeding study in rats histopathological examination of testes, ovaries and uterus revealed no evidence of an adverse
effect on the reproductive organs up to the highest doses tested (males approx. 3750 mg/kg bw/day, females approx. 750 mg/kg bw/day).
Executive summary:

Studies on fertility are not available. In the two-years feeding study in rats histopathological examination of testes, ovaries and uterus revealed no evidence of an adverse effect on the reproductive organs up to the highest tested doses (3750 mg/kg bw/day in males, 750 mg/kg bw/day in females). Soft edematous testes were observed at least as frequent in the controls as in the adipic acid dosed animals. Two of the surviving control female animals and one of the experimental females had ovarian