Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
chronic toxicity: inhalation
Remarks:
combined repeated dose and carcinogenicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1976-10 to 1978-11
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
carcinogenicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1976-10 to 1978-11
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 453 (Combined Chronic Toxicity / Carcinogenicity Studies)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
2 doses investigated
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 9 weeks
- Housing: 6 ♂ / 6 ♀ per cage
Route of administration:
inhalation: vapour
Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
whole body
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on exposure:
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: 9 m³ chambers
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Remarks:
Atmospheres monitored at least 5 times each day by two methods: Marcali test and test paper monitor.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
6 h / day
Frequency of treatment:
daily, 5 days per week, up to 113 weeks
Post exposure period:
no
Dose / conc.:
0.05 ppm (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
0.15 ppm (nominal)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
126
Control animals:
yes, sham-exposed
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily, before and after exposure

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly during the firt 8 weeks, thereafter monthly.

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: after 6, 12, 18 months, and termination.
- How many animals: 7♂/ 7♀
- Parameters checked: Hb, RBC, PCV, WBC

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: after 6, 12, 18 months, and termination.
- How many animals: 7♂/ 7♀
- Parameters checked: BUN, AlkP, GPT

URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: after 6, 12, 18 months, and termination.
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY:
Yes, interim sacrifices on 7♂ and 7♀ at 6, 12, and 18 months. Gross examination on all rats dying and at scheduled sacrifice. Organ weights on brain, liver, heart, gonads, and kidneys.

HISTOPATHOLOGY:
Yes, on 35 tissues from each rat.
Statistics:
Survival probabilities for each group were calculated by the method of Kaplan and Meier (J. Am. Statist. Ass. 53: 457 (1958)). The survival of the individual treatment groups was compared using the log rank method of Peto and Pike (Biometrics 29: 579 (1973)). All tumors observed where the difference between tumor incidence in treated animals and controls was 4 or less were not statistically significant (United States of America, National Research Council, Food Protection Committee, Nat. Acad. Sci. Publ., 749 (1959)).
Since neither in the publication (Loeser, 1983) nor in the study report (Owen, 1980+1984) statistics for tumor incidences were presented, the tumor data for rats were reassessed using both the method cited in the original protocol and the more current one-sided Fisher's exact test (Müller, 2008).
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Effect level:
0.15 ppm (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
histopathology: neoplastic

The results for general toxicity of this study are described in chapter 7.5.2

With respect to the assessment of tumour formation, there were slight increases in the tumour incidence for some locations when compared to the incidence in the controls. In Table 1, specific tissues and the number of tumours in the various treatment and control groups are listed only if there were at least two more tumours in the groups treated with TDI than in the controls. The author concluded, that the type and incidence of tumours and the numbers of tumour-bearing rats were similar in both control and TDI treated groups.

A statistical analysis of the results was not carried out, but the tumour spectrum in all groups was in the range of the general experience (Loeser, 1983). A full assessment of the original tumour data by both the protocolled method and more current methodology has been reported by Müller (2008). Overall, and taking into account the statistical results, contemporary control animal data from the laboratory and the tumour profiles of the animal strain used, Müller concluded that there was no toxicologically significant increase in the tumour incidences of this long-term TDI rat study.    

The overall evaluation of the study therefore led to the conclusion, that TDI is not carcinogenic in rats under the conditions described.

 

Table 1: Tumour incidences of the 2-year rat study with TDI (80/20)

TDI (ppm)

Sex

0

0.05

0.15

Number of animals investigated

M/F

104/104

104/105

104/105

Types of tumours for which there were at least 2 more tumours in the groups treated with than in the controls:

Adenomas (skin)

M

0

0

3

Papillomas (skin)

F

1

3

3

Benign tumours (mammary gland)

F

24

27

22

Carcinomas (mammary gland)

F

9

9

14

Fibromas (subcutis/muscle/bones)

M/F

29/1

22/1

35/4

Histiocytomas (subcutis/muscle/bones)

M

1

4

1

Malignant lymphomas (haematopoietic system)

F

1

1

3

Haemangiomas (haematopoietic system)

M

1

1

4

Islet cell adenomas (pancreas)

M

1

2

3

Adenomas (pituitary gland)

F

64

62

67

Meningiomas (brain)

M

0

0

2

Lipomatous tumours (kidney)

M

1

3

0

M = male; F = female

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980
Report date:
1980
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1984
Report date:
1984
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1983

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 453 (Combined Chronic Toxicity / Carcinogenicity Studies)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
2 doses investigated
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
m-tolylidene diisocyanate
EC Number:
247-722-4
EC Name:
m-tolylidene diisocyanate
Cas Number:
26471-62-5
Molecular formula:
C9H6N2O2
IUPAC Name:
2,4-diisocyanato-1-methylbenzene, 2,6-diisocyanato-1-methylbenzene
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2,4/ 2,6-TDI (80:20), production grade

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 9 weeks

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation: vapour
Type of inhalation exposure:
whole body
Vehicle:
air
Details on inhalation exposure:
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION:
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: Animals were housed 6 ♂ / 6 ♀ per cage and exposed in 9 m³ chambers.
- Method of conditioning air: Passage of dry nitrogen through liquid TDI maintained at 21°C. The vapour produced was then diluted with air in all-glass systems to produce the desired exposure concentration.

OTHER:
Because of the known chemical reactivity and thus its potential storage instability, TDI lots were renewed every three months and fresh TDI was placed in the respective vapour-generating apparatus at the beginning of each daily exposure period. The measured mean test concentrations of TDI were 0.052 ppm and 0.146 ppm over a period of up to 113 weeks, with standard deviations of 0.007 ppm and 0.014 ppm, respectively.

Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
5/day, each exposure group.
U.E.I. Model 7000 TDI tape monitor and the Marcali colorimetric method.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
up to 113 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
6 hours/day, 5 days per week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
0.05 ppm (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
0.15 ppm (nominal)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
126
Control animals:
yes, sham-exposed

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
URINALYSIS: Yes

Interim sacrifices were performed after 6, 12, and 18 months of exposure consisting of 7 animals/sex/dose.
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
ORGAN WEIGHTS: Yes
Other examinations:
Special histopathology of the nasal cavity.
Statistics:
Survival probabilities for each group were calculated by the method of Kaplan and Meier (J. Am. Statist. Ass. 53: 457 (1958)). The survival of the individual treatment groups was compared using the log rank method of Peto and Pike (Biometrics 29: 579 (1973)).

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Compared to control rats, there were significantly reduced body weight gains in males and in females of the highest dose groups up to study week 12 that remained significantly reduced throughout the study for female rats.
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
In rats sacrificed as scheduled (interim sacrifices after 6, 12 and 18 months + terminal sacrifice), lesions were localized primarily in the anterior respiratory mucosa of the nasal cavity. Rhinitis was increased in incidence and severity (grades1-4: minimal - marked rhinitis, generally characterized by squamous metaplasia and hyperplasia of the epithelium, leucocyte infiltration in the lamina propria and exudate in the lumen) in a dose-dependent manner and is considered to be due to local irritation.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed

Effect levels

open allclose all
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Effect level:
0.05 ppm (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Basis for effect level:
clinical signs
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Effect level:
< 0.05 ppm (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
other: no NOAEC identified
Dose descriptor:
LOAEC
Effect level:
0.15 ppm (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Basis for effect level:
clinical signs
Dose descriptor:
LOAEC
Effect level:
0.05 ppm (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
clinical signs

Target system / organ toxicity

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Any other information on results incl. tables

No exposure-related clinical signs of toxicity were observed during the study. No treatment-related changes in hematology, blood biochemistry, urinalyses, ophthalmoscopy or organ weights were recorded.

Compared to control rats, there were significantly reduced body weight gains in males and in females of the highest dose groups up to study week 12 that remained significantly reduced throughout the study for female rats. Mortality occurred in both test and control groups, with generally higher mortality rates at earlier time points in test groups than in the controls for males, providing additional supporting evidence indicating that MTD was reached.

Table 1: Body weight gain and mortality rate of rats during exposure

Males

Females

Control

Low dose

High dose

Control

Low dose

High dose

Group mean body weight gain (g):

week 0 –12

298

296

275*

136

132

121*

Group mean body weight gain (g):

week 0 - termination

554

579

525

395

378

345*

Mortality before interim sacrifice after 6 m

3/126

13/126

11/126

0/126

1/126

0/126

Mortality before interim sacrifice after 12 m

4/116

1/106

1/108

1/119

3/118

1/119

Mortality before interim sacrifice after 18 m

7/105

8/97

13/100

14/111

20/108

9/110

Mortality before terminal sacrifice

52/89

46/81

50/80

53/88

55/81

46/84

* P <0.01 when compared to the controls

In rats sacrificed as scheduled (interim sacrifices after 6, 12 and 18 months + terminal sacrifice), lesions were localized primarily in the anterior respiratory mucosa of the nasal cavity. Rhinitis was increased in incidence and severity (grades1-4: minimal - marked rhinitis, generally characterized by squamous metaplasia and hyperplasia of the epithelium, leucocyte infiltration in the lamina propria and exudate in the lumen) in a dose-dependent manner and is considered to be due to local irritation.

Table 2: Incidence of rhinitis in the anterior nasal cavity of rats

Males

Females

Control

Low dose

High dose

Control

Low dose

High dose

Grade 0*

30/58

30/55

6/51

46/56

27/47

17/57

Grade 1*

11/58

7/55(13 %)

5/51

7/56

8/47(17 %)

16/57(28 %)

Grade 2*

13/58

15/55 (27 %)

13/51(25 %)

3/56

9/47(19 %)

18/57(32 %)

Grade 3*

4/58

3/55

23/51 (45 %)

0

3/47(6 %)

5/57(9 %)

Grade 4*

0

0

4/51

0

0

0

No section

0

0

0

0

2

Percent rats with

grade1- 4 rhinitis

48 %

45 %

88 %

18 %

43 %

70 %

* Grade 0 = unremarkable; Grade 1 = minimal rhinitis, Grade 2 = slight rhinitis, Grade 3 = moderate rhinitis, Grade 4 = marked rhinitis generally characterized by squamous metaplasia and hyperplasia of the epithelium, leucocyte infiltration in the lamina propria and exudate in the lumen

Applicant's summary and conclusion