Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 292-642-5 | CAS number: 90669-48-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 8 September 2003 to 25 November 2003
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, conducted to a valid guideline and was performed under GLP conditions. Since the study was conducted with the read across substance, hydrocarbon waxes (petroleum), oxidised, it has been assigned a reliability score of 2. Read across from this substance is justified on the basis of its similar physical and chemical properties to those of the registered substance. Furthermore, it has a very similar chemical structure; the registered substance is an esterified form of the read across substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: UK department of Health Committee on Mutagenicity Guidelines for the Mutagenicity Testing of Chemicals.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hydrocarbon waxes (petroleum), oxidized
- EC Number:
- 265-205-1
- EC Name:
- Hydrocarbon waxes (petroleum), oxidized
- Cas Number:
- 64743-00-6
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable to a UVCB substance
- IUPAC Name:
- Hydrocarbon waxes (petroleum), oxidized
- Test material form:
- other: greasy solid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical appearance: Brown waxy solid
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Blood collection: For each experiment, sufficient whole blood was drawn from the peripheral circulation of a volunteer who had been previously screened for suitability.
- Average generation time: The cell-cycle time for the lymphocytes from the donors used in this study were determined using BrdU (bromodeoxyuridine) incorporation to assess the number of first, second and third division metaphase cells and so calculate the average generation time (AGT). The average AGT for the regular donors used in this laboratory has been determined to be approximately 1 7 hours under typical experimental exposure conditions.
- Cell culture: Cells were grown in Eagle’s minimal essential medium with HEPES buffer (MEM), supplemented with L-glutamine, penicillidstreptomycin, amphotericin B and 1 5% foetal calf serum, at 37°C with 5% COz in air. The lymphocytes of fresh heparinised whole blood were stimulated to divide by the addition of phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) at 90 µg/mL final concentration. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1
4 hour exposure with and without S9 mix: 0, 156.25, 312.5, 625, 1250, 1875, 2500 µg/mL
Experiment 2
4 hour exposure with S9 mix: 0, 39.06, 78.13, 156.25, 312.5, 625 and 1250 µg/mL
24 hour exposure without S9 mix: 0, 39.06, 78.13, 156.25, 312.5, 468.75 and 625 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ethanol
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium.
PRELIMINARY STUDY:
A dose range finding study was performed using concentrations of the test material between 19.5 and 5000 µg/mL.
MAIN TEST: The study was carried out in two experiments, utilising four different exposure conditions
Experiment 1
- The cells were exposed for 4 hours without S9-mix followed by 20 hour culture in media free from the test material, prior to cell harvest
- The cells were exposed for 4 hours with S9-mix followed by 20 hour culture in media free from the test material, prior to cell harvest
Experiment 2
- Continuous exposure to the test material for 24 hours prior to cell harvesting.
- The cells were exposed to the test material for 4 hours with S9-mix followed by 20 hour culture in test material free media, prior to cell harvest
TEST CONDITIONS:
- Preincubation period: 48 hours at 37 ºC, 5 % CO2 in humidified air
- Volume of test material, vehicle or positive control: 0.1 mL
- Total nominal volume: 10 mL
- Volume and concentration of S9 mix: 1 mL of 20 % S9-mix in experiment 1 and 1 mL of 10 % S9-mix in experiment 2
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 4 hours with the test material and 20 hours without the test material
- In the case of the continuous exposure the expression time was 24 hours, with the test material
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): demecolcine, Colcemid 0.1 µg/mL
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 5% Gurrs Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Tests performed in duplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2000 lymphocytes cell nuclei were counted and the number of cells in methaphase recorded and expressed as the mitotic index and as a percentage of the vehicle control value. - Evaluation criteria:
- Scoring:
Where possible the first 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases from each culture were counted, where there were approximately 50 % of cells with aberrations, slide evaluation was terminated at 50 cells. If the cell had 44-48 chromosomes, any gaps, breaks or rearrangements were noted according to the simplified system of Savage (1976).
The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared, where necessary, with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher’s Exact test. Samples which showed a statistical increase in aberrations were considered to have given a positive result. - Statistics:
- Fisher’s Exact test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Experiment 1:
- The test material did not induce a statistically significant increase in the frequency of cells with aberrations either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
- The maximum dose level with scoreable metaphases present was 1250 µg/mL in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The mitotic data confirms the qualitative assessment that the dose-related inhibition of mitotic index was observed and that 33 % mitotic inhibition was achieved at 1250 µg/mL in the absence of S9 and 35 % in the presence of S9.
- Complete inhibition was observed at 1875 and 2500 µg/mL in both exposure groups.
Experiment 2:
- The test material did not induce a statistically significant increase in the frequency of cells with aberrations either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
- Qualitative assessment of the slides determined that the maximum dose level with scorable metaphases was 1250 µg/mL with S9 mix and 468.75 µg/mL without S9 mix in experiment 2.
- The mitotic index data confirms the qualitative observations that a dose-related inhibition of mitotic index was observed and that 67 % mitotic inhibition as achieved at 468.75 µg/mL in the absence of S9. In the presence of S9 50 % mitotic inhibition was achieved at 1250 µg/mL.
Table 1: Results of Chromosome Aberrations
Experiment No. |
With or Without S9 mix |
Treatment Group |
Dose Level (µg/ml) |
Total No. of Aberrations |
Frequency of Aberrant Cells (%) |
|||
(+ Gaps) |
(- Gaps) |
(+ Gaps) |
(- Gaps) |
|||||
1 |
Without |
Vehicle Control |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||
Test Material |
312.5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|||
625 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
||||
1250 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
||||
1875 |
TOXIC |
|||||||
Positive Control MMC |
0.4 |
39 |
29 |
28 |
22*** |
|||
1 |
With |
Vehicle Control |
7 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
||
Test Material |
312.5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|||
625 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
||||
1250 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
||||
1875 |
TOXIC |
|||||||
Positive Control CP |
10 |
89 |
50 |
65 |
39*** |
|||
2 |
Without |
Vehicle Control |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
||
Test Material |
156.25 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|||
312.5 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
||||
468.75 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||||
625 |
TOXIC |
|||||||
Positive Control MMC |
0.2 |
72 |
53 |
50 |
39*** |
|||
2 |
With |
Vehicle Control |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
||
Test Material |
312.5 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|||
625 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
||||
1250 |
8 |
3 |
8 |
3 |
||||
Positive Control CP |
0.2 |
96 |
73 |
52 |
42*** |
MMC = Mitomycin C
CP = Cyclophosphamide
*** = P < 0.001
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with and without metabolic activation
Under the conditions of the study, the test material was determined to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes. There was no statistically significant increase in the frequency of cell aberrations in the absence or presence of metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
In a GLP compliant chromosome aberration study performed according to the standardised guidelines OECD 473, EU Method B.10 and UK department of Health Committee on Mutagenicity Guidelines for the Mutagenicity Testing of Chemicals, the test material was determined to be non-clastogenic. Under the conditions of the test the human lymphocyte did not produce a statistically significant increase in the frequency of cell aberrations in the absence or presence of metabolic activation. Therefore the test material is considered to be non-mutagenic.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.