Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 3 to 9 November, 2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Cyclohexene
EC Number:
203-807-8
EC Name:
Cyclohexene
Cas Number:
110-83-8
Molecular formula:
C6H10
IUPAC Name:
cyclohexene
Details on test material:
Lot No. 10817K
Purity: 99.83%

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: ELEVAGE JANVIER
Route des Chènes Secs B.P. 4105 53940 LE GENEST-ST-ISLE, France
- Age at study initiation: 11-12 weeks old (age-matched, within one week)
- Weight at study initiation: 23.3 – 25.6 grams (The weight variation in animals involved in the study did not exceed ± 20 % of the mean weight)
- Housing: Group caging / mice were provided with glass tunnel-tubes

- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Animals received ssniff SM R/M-Z+H "Autoclavable complete diet for rats and mice – breeding and maintenance" (Batch number: 847 4257, Expiry Date: January 2011) produced by ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH (Ferdinand-Gabriel-Weg 16, D-59494 Soest, Germany), ad libitum. The food was considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.

- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Animals received tap water from the municipal supply from 500 mL bottle, ad libitum. Water quality control analysis was performed once every three months and microbiological assessment was performed monthly by Veszprém County Institute of State Public Health and Medical Officer Service (ÁNTSZ, H-8201 Veszprém, József Attila u. 36., Hungary).

- Acclimation period: 26 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15-20 air exchange/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs light): 12 hours daily

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
Test item concentration are 100, 50, 25 (% w/v), respectively.
No. of animals per dose:
4 animals / treatment group
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: 100% (undiluted) and 50 (w/v) % in AOO
- Irritation: No irritation was observed. Doses of 100 (undiluted) and 50 (w/v) % were considered to be acceptable for the main tests.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: The stimulation index values were 2.7, 1.2 and 1.4 at concentrations of 100 %, 50 % and 25 %, respectively.
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: The DPM values were 1748.5, 823.5 and 949.5 at concentrations of 100 %, 50 % and 25 %, respectively.

Any other information on results incl. tables

- CLINICAL OBSERVATION

No mortality or signs of systemic toxicity were observed during the study.

- BODY WEIGHT MEASUREMENT

No treatment related effects were observed on animal body weights. Individual and mean body weights are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Individual Body Weights for all Animals with Group Means

 Animal Number Identity Number  Test GroupName   Initial BodyWeight(g) Terminal BodyWeught(g) 
 5970  1  Negative control (vehicle), AOO 25.1   23.1
 5958  2    24.5  24.3
 5953  3    24.2  23.7
5965   4    23.4  23.7
     Mean 24.3   23.7
 5973  5   100 (w/v) %  Cyclohexene in AOO  25.2  22.9
 5956  6    24.4  23.9
 5960  7    23.8  23.7
 5967  8    23.3  22.2
     Mean 24.2  23.2 
 5971  9   50 (w/v) % Cyclohexene in AOO   25.6   24.3
 5954  10   24.4   23.5
 5959 11    24.5  24.6
 5963  12    23.6  24.0
    Mean  24.5   24.1
 5955  13   25 (w/v) % Cyclohexene in AOO  25.6  24.3
 5957  14    24.0   24.4
 5962  15    24.0  21.9
 5964  16    23.6  22.6
     Mean  24.2  23.2
 5966  17  Positive control, 25 (w/v) % HCA in AOO  24.9  22.8
 5969  18    24.5  22.4
 5972  19    24.7  23.1
 5968  20    23.5  21.8
     Mean 24.4   22.5

- PROLIFERATION ASSAY

The results of the proliferation assay are summarized in Table 2. The appearance of the lymph nodes was normal in the negative (vehicle) control and test item treated groups. Larger than normal lymph nodes were observed in the positive control group.

Table2 DPM, DPN and Stimulation Index Values for all Groups

 Test GroupName Measured DPM/group DPM  No. of Nodes  DPN  StimulationIndex Values 
Background (5 (w/v) % TCA ) 30.5 
 Negative control(AOO) 690   659.5 8  82.4  1.0
 Cyclohexene100 (w/v) %  1779  1748.5  8  218.6  2.7
Cyclohexene 50 (w/v) %  854  823.5  8  102.9  1.2
 Cyclohexene25 (w/v) %  980  949.5  8  118.7  1.4
 Positive control(25% HCA)  7087  7056.5  8  882.1 10.7

- INTERPRATION OF OBSERVATION

There were no confounding effects of irritation or systemic toxicity at the applied concentrations and the proliferation values obtained are considered to reflect the real potential of the test item to cause lymphoproliferation in the Local Lymph Node Assay. The resulted stimulation indexes observed under these exaggerated test conditions was considered to be good evidence that Cyclohexene is a non-sensitizer.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the present assay cyclohexene, tested in a suitable vehicle, was shown to have no sensitisation potential (non-sensitizer) in the Local Lymph Node Assay.