Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation
Remarks:
in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Acceptable, well-documented publication which meets basic scientific principles

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
The Identification of Contact Allergens by Human Assay - III. The Maximization Test: A Procedure for Screening and Rating Contact Sensitizers
Author:
Kligman AM
Year:
1966
Bibliographic source:
J Invest Dermatol 47(5), 393-409

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
For induction, test substances are repeatedly applied to the skin on the forearm of human subjects. For challenge, a single dose of test substance is epicutaneously applied to the back of test subjects.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
other: human maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Benzene
EC Number:
200-753-7
EC Name:
Benzene
Cas Number:
71-43-2
Molecular formula:
C6H6
IUPAC Name:
benzene
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): benzene
- no further information on test substance

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
human
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST SUBJECTS: male afro-american healthy adults aged 18 to 50

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: mineral oil or petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 50%
Challenge: 20%
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: mineral oil or petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 50%
Challenge: 20%
No. of animals per dose:
25 human volunteers
Details on study design:
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 5
- Exposure period: 15 days
- Test groups: 1.0 mL 50% test substance solution on a ca. 4 x 4 cm Webril patch covered by 3 M Blenderm tape completely impermeable
- Control group: no control group
- Site: forearm or calf
- Frequency of applications: every 72 h
- Duration: 48 h
- Concentrations: 50% solution in all induction exposures

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: no data
- Exposure period: 48 h
- Test groups: 0.4 mL of 20% test substance solution on a ca. 2.5 y 2.5 cm Webril patch covered by 3 M Blenderm tape completely impermeable
- Control group: no control group
- Site: back
- Concentrations: 20% test substance concentration in mineral oil or petrolatum
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): immediately after removal of the patch and again in another 2 days
Challenge controls:
untreated site on the back of test subject

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
induction 50%, challenge 20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
25
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: induction 50%, challenge 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 25.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
96
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
induction 50%, challenge 20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
25
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 96.0. Group: test group. Dose level: induction 50%, challenge 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 25.0.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
In a human maximisation test according to Kligman, none of the 25 test subjects showed a sensitisation reaction. There was no evidence of a sensitising potential of benzene.