Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 406-260-5 | CAS number: 58834-75-6 BTN; VPO CATALYST
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Acute Toxicity: inhalation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1994
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant study conducted in accordance with internationally recognised test methods
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 994
- Report date:
- 1994
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.2 (Acute Toxicity (Inhalation))
- Version / remarks:
- .
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Vanadyl pyrophosphate
- EC Number:
- 406-260-5
- EC Name:
- Vanadyl pyrophosphate
- Cas Number:
- 58834-75-6
- Molecular formula:
- V2P2O9
- IUPAC Name:
- divanadium(4+) (phosphonatooxy)phosphonate dioxidandiide
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): BTN/A
- Chemical name: Vanadyl pyrophosphate
- Chemical formula: (VO)2P207
- Physical state: brown solid
- Lot/batch No.:0001
- Purity: >98%
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, prtected from light
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: BRL, Biological Research Laboratory Ltd. CH-4414 Fuellinsdorf, Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: Males 8 - 10 weeks Females 10 - 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Males 180.1 - 199.6 g Females 180.4 - 199.8 g
- Fasting period before study: n/a
- Housing: groups of five of teh same sex in Makrolon type-4 cages (dimensions in mm: 590 x 385 x 200), with standard softwood bedding ("Lignocel", Schi11 AG, CH-4132 Muttenz, SWitzerland).
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Animals had ad libitum access to pelleted standard Kliba 343, rat maintenance diet, Batch nos. 86/93 and 87/93 ("Kliba", Klingentalml)ehle AG, CH-4303 Kaiseraugst, SWitzerland).
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Animals had ad libitum access to community tap water from Geneva.
- Acclimation period:6 days (group 1) or 15 days (group 2)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3°C,
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light: 12 hours light / 12 hours dark.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: dust
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- nose only
- Vehicle:
- other: unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on inhalation exposure:
- Inhalation exposure was performed according to the method of Sachsse et al. (1973, 1976). The animals were confined separately in Makrolon tubes which were positioned radially around the exposure chamber. The test article stream reached the animal's nose through ports situated at different levels around the axis of the chamber. Each level had ports that could be rotated, allowing clo'se observation of all the animals without interruption .of exposure.The flow-past, nose-only design of the exposure system was based upon the fluid dynamic modeling of the aerosol flow to ensure a uniform test article distribution and provide a constant stream of "fresh" test article to each animal, and preclude rebreathing the exhaled air. The internal active volume of the chamber for exposing up to 24 animals was approximately 0.7 litres. The resulting time for the concentration to reach 99 % of its ultimate value (T99) at an animal port was 7 seconds.
GENERATION OF THE TEST ARTICLE: The test article was generated using a RBG-1000 aerosol. generator (Palas, Germany) connected (fi rst technical test) or not connected (second technical test) to a micronising Jet-mill. As the percentage of particles = 3 um (47.1 %) and the MMAD (3.28 um) measured without the Jet-mill were within an acceptable range, no jet-mill was used for the animal study. The test atmosphere generated was then di1uted wi th compressed filtered air to achieve the concentration required for this study and discharged through a Ni 63 charge neutraliser into the exposure chamber. The percentage of particles =3 um measured during the animal study was, however, lower (29.7 %), and a the MMAD higher (4.50 um) than in the technical test. This difference was thought to reflect the progressive filling of the charge neutraliser, which despite frequent emptying, caused a reduction in the free section of the charge neutraliser, and hence, an increase in the velocity of the particles, especially of the large particles. In an attempt to achieve an aerosol with a MMAD closer to 3um (target value), a second technical test as well a second group of animals were exposed to the test article without using a Ni 63 charge neutraliser and by placing a cyclon distal to the aerosol generator. The design of the cyclon allows part of the largest particles to deposit without being discharged tnto the exposure chamber. In the technical test the percentage of particles = 3um was 54.4 % and the MMAD 2.41 um. In the second animal group, however, the percentage of particles =3 um fell to 29.2 % and the MMAD value rose to 4.54 um.
EXPOSURE SYSTEM MONITORING: Samples for the measurements of the test article concentrations, particle size distribution, oxygen concentration, relative humidity and temperature were collected from a port of the chamber, directly from the feed tube which delivers IIfreshll test article to the animal's nose. Therefore all the measurements were isoax;al and represented exactly what was delivered to the animals.
On-line Monitoring of Concentration:
The relative aerosol concentration was monitored on-line using a RAM-1 light scattering type aerosol device from GCA Corp. Bedford, Massachusett U.S.A
Gravimetric Concentration:
Samples of the test atmosphere were collected (n=6 in group 1, n=5 in group 2) on Ge1man Type AlE, 47 mm diameter glass fiber fi1ters using a stai n1ess steel filter sampling device (Gelman Science Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A). The mean sampling airflow rates were 1.57 l/min (group 1) and 1.50 l/min (group 2). Gravimetric concentrations were calculated by dividing the weight of the material collected on the filters by the volume of air passing through them during the collection period.
Particle Size Distribution and Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter:
The particle size of the test atmosphere was determined using a Mercer 7 stagecascade impactor (Model 02-130, In-Tox Products, Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.A). The test atmosphere was impacted at each stage onto stainless steel slips which were weighed before and after sampl ing using a model M3 balance (Mettler AG, CH-8604 Volketswil, Switzerland). The airflow rate during sampling was 1 l/min. The amount of test article deposited on each stage repr sents the quantity of aerosol particles obtained for a speci'fied aerodynamic diameter range (def; ned by the stage cutoff diameter and the cutoff diameter of the preceding stage). The values are expressed as a percentage of the total quantity of aerosol deposited in the impactor. These determinations were performed four times in group 1 and 5 times in group 2. Assuming a log-normal distribution, the particle size distribution is described by the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and the distribution width, (geometric standard deviation, GSD). The MMAD is derived by plotting the cumulative percentage of particles against the log of the aerodynamic diameter on a log-probability (probit) scale using a software program from Biosoft, Cambridge, U.K. The 50 % intercept of the resulting regression line is the MMAD, and the slope of the 1i ne represents the GSD. The latter is ca1cul ated by diViding the mass median diameter by the diameter where· the 15.9 % (=4 on probit scale) line intercepts the regression line
Oxygen Concentration:
The oxygen concentration was measured once during each exposure using an Oxopac RO device from Draegerwerk AG, CH-8047 Zurich, Switzerland
Relative Humidity and Temperature:
The relative humidity and temperature were determined once during each exposure using a HMI 32, VAISALA humidity and temperature indicator from Kuenzli Elektronik, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland. - Duration of exposure:
- 4 h
- Concentrations:
- Concentrations (gravimetric) (mean ± SD.)
Group 1: 5.28 ± 0.58 mg/L air (n = 6)
Group 2 5.83 ± 1.46 mg/L air (n =5) - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Number of groups: 2
Number of animals per group: 5 males and 5 females - Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 15d
- Frequency of observations and weighing: on days 1 (before exposure), 8 and 15 of test using a Mettler PM 4000 balance.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes. Necropsies were performed by experienced prosectors under the management of a pathologist. All animals were necropsied. All animals were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (approximately 300 mg/kg b.w.) and exsangui nated. All macroscopi c changes or abnormality es were descri bed and recorded. The lungs, trachea and larynx and nasopharyngeal tissues were collected from all animals and fixed in a neutral phosphate buffered 4 ~ formaldehyde solution. The lungs were instilled with the fixative at a hydrostatic pressure of 30 cm H20. All collected organ/tissues are available for histopathological examination if requested by the Sponsor.
- Other examinations performed:
- clinical signs: once per hour during exposure (only grossly abnormal signs, as the animals were 1n restraint tUbes), once after exposure and at least once daily thereafter.
- body weight.
- mortality: once per hour during exposure, once after exposure on test day 1, and twice daily thereafter.
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Clinical signs - Once / hour during exposure, following exposure on Day 1 and at least daily thereafter for 14 days. Body weight: Weekly (Days 1, 8 and 15)
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes - Statistics:
- Not applicable
Results and discussion
Effect levels
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- > 5.83 mg/L air
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Mortality:
- No deaths occurred during the exposure nor during the 15-day observation period.
- Clinical signs:
- other: Restlessness was noted in a few animals of both groups during exposure. Just after exposure, hunched posture and a slight degree of tachypnea were noted in all animals of both groups. Ruffled fur was recorded in all animals except in the males of group 1.
- Body weight:
- Except for one female (group 2) which did not gain weight between test days 1 and 8, other animals gained weight at a normal rate.
- Gross pathology:
- Except for 1 male in group 2 and 1 female in group 1, the lungs of all other animals were incompletely collapsed with reddish or gray white foci in three cases.
- Other findings:
- The percentage of particles =3 um (29.7 %) and the MMAD (4.50 um) measured when generating the test article with an aerosol generator and passing the test atmosphere through a Ni 63 charge neutraliser, were lower than in a pretest performed under the same experimental conditions. In an attempt to generate the test article with a MMAD value closer to 3 um, a second. technical test and animal study were performed without using a Ni 63 charge neutraliser and by placing a cyclon between the generator and the exposure chamber. The results obtained with this system were s mi1ar to those achieved wi thout the cycl on. There were also no differences in the clinical signs observed which in both cases disappeared after test day 4. The percentage of particles 3 =um obtained are considered to be the highest technically achievable.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Acute inhalation toxicity has been investigated in accordance with OECD/EU test methods. Rats were exposed for 4 hours to an atmosphere containing the highest achievable concentration that could be generated. The percentage of particles < 4.6 um was in excess of 60%. The median lethal dose (LC50) in the rat was >5.83 mg/L air.
- Executive summary:
Acute inhalation toxicity has been investigated in accordance with OECD/EU test methods. Rats were exposed for 4 hours to an atmosphere containing the highest achievable concentration that could be generated. The percentage of particles < 4.6 um was in excess of 60%. The median lethal dose (LC50) in the rat was >5.83 mg/L air.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.