Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 425-240-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- (1984)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Ltd, Margate, UK
- Age at study initiation: 35-42 weeks
- Weight range at study initiation: males 25-31 g; females 20-28 g
- Housing: in groups of no more than 3 animals of the same sex in appropriate caging
- Diet and water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-21°C
- Humidity (%): 51-59
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- 1% (m/v) methylcellulose
- Details on exposure:
- The test substance was injected intraperitoneally.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Animals were treated once.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single intraperitoneal administration of the test substance or the positive or negative control substance.
- Post exposure period:
- The animals were sacrificed for bone marrow preparation 24 hours after test substance administration. Additional groups of animals receiving 150 mg/kg were sacrificed 48 hours after test substance administration.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
125, 250 and 375 mg/kg bw
Basis:
other: main study, trial 1 - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
25, 75 and 150 mg/kg bw
Basis:
other: main study, repeat - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 for sacrifice time 24 hours; only for 150 mg/kg bw: 5 for sacrifice time 48 hours
- Control animals:
- other: yes, for negative control concurrent vehicle, sacrifice time 24 and 48 hours... (see attached file)
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide, dissolved in physiological saline
- Route of administration: intraperitoneally
- Doses / concentrations: single dose of 40 mg/kg bw, sacrifice time 24 hours after substance administration. - Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow smears examined.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
Data from the range-finding study and the main study, trial 1 were combined, and a maximum acceptable dose determined. This was used as the highest level for the repeat of the main study.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Both femurs from each animal were used for slide preparation. Staining of the slides was achieved according a modification of the method of Gollapudi and Kamra, Mutation Res 64, 1979, 45-46.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Initially the relative proportions of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) were determined until a total of at least 1000 cells (PCE plus NCE) had been analysed. Counting continued (but of PCE only) until at least 2000 PCE had been observed. All PCE containing micronuclei observed during these two phases of counting were recorded. The vernier coordinates of all cells containing micronuclei were recorded to a maximum of six per 2000 cells scored. The ratio of PCE/NCE for each animal and the mean for each group was calculated. The individual and group mean frequency of micronucleated PCE/1000 were also determined.
OTHER: - Evaluation criteria:
- The test article was to be considered as positive in this assay if a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated PCE occurred at least at one dose, at one sampling time, and the frequency of micronucleated PCE at such a point exceeded the historical vehicle control range.
- Statistics:
- The group mean frequencies of micronucleated PCE in vehicle control animals were compared with historical negative control ranges to determine whether or not the assay was acceptable. For each group, inter-individual variation in the numbers of micronucleated PCE was estimated by means of a heterogeneity Chi²-test. The numbers of micronucleated PCE in each treated group (males and females, separately and combined) were then compared with the numbers in vehicle control groups by using a 2 x 2 contingency table to determine Chi². Probability values of p = 0.05 were to be accepted as significant. A further statistical test (for linear trend) was used to evaluate possible dose-response relationships.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
Groups of 3 male and female mice received a single i.p. administration of the test substance at doses covering the range of 357-2000 mg/kg bw. Within the 4-days observation period following administration all animals exhibited clinical signs. Mortalities were observed at all doses except 357 mg/kg.
RESULTS OF MAIN STUDY, TRIAL 1
Excessive numbers of mortalities at 250 and 375 mg/kg in this trial resulted in an insufficient number of animals available for sampling.
RESULTS OF MAIN STUDY, REPEAT
No significant increases in frequencies of micronucleated cells were seen in the test groups. At the maximum dose levels, systemic toxicity and findings suggestive of effects on bone marrow (a trend towards reduced PCE/NCE ratios) were seen. - Executive summary:
A mouse bone marrow micronucleus test (according to EU Method B.12) was conducted with 5 male and 5 female mice receiving each a single intraperitoneal injection of a test substance dose in vehicle (1% methylcellulose). For the first main testing doses of 125, 250 and 375 mg/kg bw were employed, but excessive numbers of mortalities at the higher dose groups resulted in an insufficient number of animals available for sampling. Therefore the testing was repeated with doses of 25, 75 and 150 mg/kg bw. Animals were sacrificed for preparation of bone marrow smears 24 and 48 hours after test substance administration, the latter only for control and high dose group animals.
In the dose group 150 mg/kg bw clinical signs and mortalities could be observed, and also findings suggestive of effects on bone marrow (a trend towards reduced PCE/NCE ratios). No statistically significant increases in frequencies of micronucleated cells were seen in the test-groups, therefore it was concluded that the test substance was not genotoxic in vivo.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
In vitro toxicity testing revealed negative results for gene mutation assays (Ames, OECD TG 471; HPRT, OECD TG 476), but a positive result for an in vitro chromosomal aberrations test with and without metabolic activation (OECD TG 473). A micronucleus in vivo test (EU Method B.12) with single intraperitoneal injections of the test substance up to doses of 150 mg/kg yielded a negative result and does not confirm a clastogenic potential. As clinical signs and mortalities were observed in the in vivo experiment an adequate systemic availability could be assumed. Therefore, the substance is not expected to be genotoxic in vivo.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Highest tier study available for the endpoint
Justification for classification or non-classification
Not classified for genetic toxicity according to Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 (Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008) and based on the criteria set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 or in Annex VI to Council Directive 67/548/EEC (June 1967).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.