2-(isopropylthio)-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)pyridine

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Administrative data

Endpoint:

in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells

Remarks:

Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

2001

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2001

Report date:

2001

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)

Test guideline 3

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Type of assay:

in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

2-(isopropylthio)-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)pyridine

EC Number:

696-441-7

Cas Number:

256473-05-9

Molecular formula:

C10H12F3NOS

IUPAC Name:

2-(isopropylthio)-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)pyridine

Method

Species / strain

Species / strain / cell type:

Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)

Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):

- Type and identity of media:
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes

Metabolic activation:

with and without

Metabolic activation system:

S9 Mix

Test concentrations with justification for top dose:

See below (Table 1)

Vehicle / solvent:

- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO

Controls

Controls 1

Untreated negative controls:

yes

Remarks:

Culture medium

Negative solvent / vehicle controls:

yes

Remarks:

DMSO

True negative controls:

no

Positive controls:

yes

Positive control substance:

ethylmethanesulphonate

Remarks:

Migrated to IUCLID6: in the group without S9 mix

Controls 2

Positive controls:

yes

Positive control substance:

cyclophosphamide

Remarks:

Migrated to IUCLID6: in the group with S9 mix

Details on test system and experimental conditions:

METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4, 18 and 28 hours (see Table 1)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 4, 18 and 28 hours (see Table 1)

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 well spread metaphase plates per culture, only metaphases with chromosome numbers of 22+/-1 were included in the analysis

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cell number and/or mitotic indices blow 50 % of the control

Evaluation criteria:

Breaks, fragments, dilations, exchanges and chromosome disintegrations were recorded as structural chromosome aberrations.

A test item is classified as non-clastogenic if:
- the number of induced structural chromosome aberrations in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of our historical control data (0.0-4.0%
aberrant cells, exclusive gaps).
and/or
- no significant increase of the number of structural chromosome aberrations is observed.

A test item is classified as clastogenic if:
- the number of induced structural chromosome aberrations is not in the range of our historical control data (0.0-4.0% aberrant cells, exclusive
gaps).
and
- either a concentration-related or a significant increase of number of structural chromosome aberrations is observed.

Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Fisher’s exact test (p<0.05). However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together. If the criteria mentioned above for the test item are not clearly met, the classification with regard to the historical data and the biological relevance is discussed and/or a confirmatory experiment is performed.

Statistics:

Fisher’s exact test (p<0.05)

Results and discussion

Test results

Test results 1

Species / strain:

Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)

Metabolic activation:

without

Genotoxicity:

negative

Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:

cytotoxicity

Vehicle controls validity:

valid

Untreated negative controls validity:

valid

Positive controls validity:

valid

Test results 2

Species / strain:

Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)

Metabolic activation:

with

Genotoxicity:

negative

Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:

cytotoxicity

Vehicle controls validity:

valid

Untreated negative controls validity:

valid

Positive controls validity:

valid

Additional information on results:

TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no relevant influence
- Effects of osmolality: no relevant influence
- Water solubility: above tested concentrations
- Precipitation: not observed

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: performed

Remarks on result:

other: all strains/cell types tested

Remarks:

Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Cytotoxicity was observed after treatment with 93.8 µg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix and with 93.8 µg/mL and above in the presence with S9 mix (range finder test).

In both experiments, in absences and presence of S9 mix no increased aberration frequencies s were observed.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:

Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

Executive summary:

The in vitro chromosome aberration with ITTFEP (purity 82.3%) in Chinese Hamster V79 cells was determined in a GLP compliant test according to OECD 473, EU Method B.10 and OPPTS 870.5375. Since the study from Czich (2001) was performed under GLP and according the guideline and based on the good documentation the study was awarded with Klimisch 1. Cytotoxicity was observed after treatment with 93.8 µg/mL and above in the absence and presence with S9 mix. The positive controls showed distinct increases in cells with structural chromosome aberrations.

In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce structural chromosome aberrations in V79 cells.