Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-853-5 | CAS number: 943586-12-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010-09-08 to 2010-09-10
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was performed as an in vitro study using the SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model (HCE, SkinEthic Laboratories, Nice, France). This type of study, although not yet formally validated or adopted by regulatory authorities usually is a stand-alone test or as part of a tiered testing strategy for determining eye irritation at the lower end of irritancy. Initially, a DEREK prediction of PC2414 did not indicate any toxicological effects including eye irritation, indicating the need for a tiered testing strategy. The study protocol used has undergone successful pre-validation at Harlan Laboratories Ltd. and will form part of an international validation study during 2010 designed to offer a replacement to the in vivo rabbit eye test. The study was performed in accordance with GLP regulation and with no deviation to study plan.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2011
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The purpose of the study was to determine the eye irritation potential of PC2424 using the SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model (HCE, SkinEthic Laboratories, Nice, France). The test is based on the hypothesis that irritant chemicals are able to penetrate the stratum corneum of the SkinEthic HCE model and are sufficiently cytotoxic to cause cell death in the underlying cell layers. Cytotoxicity was determined by the reduction of MTT to formazan by viable cells in the PC2414 treated tissues (quantitative measurement of tissue viability) relative to the negative control. Based on the relative mean tissue viability, a chemical is considered irritant (I) if the tissue viability is less than 60% and non-irritant (NI) if the tissue viability is equal or larger than 60%.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- PC2414
- IUPAC Name:
- PC2414
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): PC2414
- Lot/batch No.: Y5UB376
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2013-03-01
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal mode
- Strain:
- other: SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal mode
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- NA
Test system
- Vehicle:
- other: SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal mode
- Controls:
- other: SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal mode
- Amount / concentration applied:
- NA
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- NA
- Observation period (in vivo):
- NA
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- NA
- Details on study design:
- The SkinEthic HCE model consists of transformed human keratinocytes of the cell line HCE (LSU EYE Center, New Orleans, USA) that form a corneal epithelial tissue (mucosa), devoid of stratum corneum, resembling, historically, the mucosa of the human eye. PC2414 was applied directly to the culture surface, at the air interface, so that undiluted and/or end use dilutions can be tested directly. The model consists of an airlifted, living, corneal tissue construct, produced in polycarbonate inserts in serum-free and chemically defined medium.
The test is based on the hypothesis that irritant chemicals are able to penetrate the stratum corneum of the SkinEthic HCE model and are sufficiently cytotoxic to cause cell death in the underlying cell layers.
Cytotoxicity was determined by the reduction of MTT to formazan by viable cells in the PC2414 treated tissues (quantitative measurement of tissue viability) relative to the negative control. PC2414 treated tissue was retained for further histopathological investigations if indicated in the cytoxicity determination.
The experimental design of the study consisted of a test for direct reduction of MTT by PC2414 followed by the main test. In the main test, triplicate tissues were treated with 30 mg PC2414 for 10 minutes. Triplicate tissues treated with a standeard solution A served as negative control and triplicate tissues treated with 30 ul 1% SDS served as positive control.
At the end of the exposure period each tissue was rinsed. The rinsed tissues (two per group) were taken for MTT loading. The remaining tissues were retained for possible histopathology.
Following MTT loading the reduced MTT was extracted from the tissues. After extraction the absorbency of triplicate aliquots of the extracted MTT solution for each tissue was measured. The optical density was measured at 540 nm (OD540). The percentage viability was calculated as MTT conversion relative to the negative controls.
The tissues retained for possible histopathology were carefully cut out of the polycarbonate inserts with a sharp scalpel. The tissues were carefully cut in half. Both halves were placed into a pre-labelled 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube containing 1 ml of 10% Formalin and stored at room temperature.
Results and discussion
In vivo
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Assessment of eye irritation potential (Table 1):
The relative mean viability of PC2414 after a 10 min exposure period was 71.1%. The relative mean viability of the positive control after a 10 min exposure period was 45.1%.. - Other effects:
- PC2414 and positive control treated tissues appeared blue/white which was considered to be indicative of semi-viable tissue. The negative control treated tussies appeared blue which was considered to be indicative of viable tissue. Visual assessment is a subjective observation incorporated for trhe purpose of identifying possible equivocal results. The results of the visual observation is approximate and has no impact on the classification of PC2414.
Based on the results it was considered unnecessary to proceed with tissue histopathalogy.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Assessment of eye irritation of potential of PC2414 - viability of HCE tissues
Test substance |
OD540 |
Mean OD540 |
Relative viability (%) |
Negative Control |
0.977 |
0.983 |
100 |
Negative Control |
0.989 |
||
Positive Control |
0.442 |
0.443 |
45.1 |
Positive Control |
0.443 |
||
PC2414 |
0.643 |
0.699 |
71.1 |
PC2414 |
0.754 |
The relative viability of the positive and negative controls groups were appropriate and the assay acceptance criteria fulfilled. The
quality controls for the HCE model was acceptable according to the supplied technical data sheet and together with the fulfilled assay acceptance criteria the study was considered to be valid.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
- Conclusions:
- PC2414 was shown not to be non-irritating to eye when tested in vitro in the SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model (HCE, SkinEthic Laboratories, Nice, France).
- Executive summary:
The eye irritation potential of PC2424 was determined using the in vitro SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model (HCE, SkinEthic Laboratories, Nice, France). This type of study, although not yet formally validated or adopted by regulatory authorities was part of a tiered testing strategy for determining eye irritation at the lower end of irritancy. Initially, a DEREK prediction of PC2414 did not indicate any toxicological effects including eye irritation, indicating the need for a tiered testing strategy.
The test is based on the hypothesis that irritant chemicals are able to penetrate the stratum corneum of the SkinEthic HCE model and are sufficiently cytotoxic to cause cell death in the underlying cell layers. Cytotoxicity was determined by the reduction of MTT to formazan by viable cells in the PC2414 treated tissues (quantitative measurement of tissue viability) relative to the negative control. In this test, the quality criteria required for acceptance of results were satisfied and PC2414 was determined to be non-irritant.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.