Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP - Guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1999
Report date:
1999

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Version / remarks:
adopted 24 February 1987
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): DS-2920A-E
- Physical state: orange solid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Lot/batch No.: 004
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Sprague-Dawley (Crl : CD ® (SD) IGS BR)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Ltd ., Margate, Kent, UK
- Age at study initiation: eight to twelve weeks.
- Weight at study initiation: males: 205 - 218 g, females: 200 - 221 g,
- Fasting period before study: overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately three to four hours after dosing
- Housing: The animals were housed in suspended polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. The animals were housed individually during the 24-hour exposure period and in groups of five, by sex, for the remainder of the study.
- Diet: Rat and Mouse Expanded Diet No . 1, Special Diet Services Limited, Witham, Essex, UK), ad libitum
- Water: mains drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least five days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 21
- Humidity (%): 51 - 65
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 15 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
other: The test material was moistened with distilled water.
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- On the day before treatment the back and flanks of each animal were clipped free of hair using veterinary dippers.
- Area of exposure: back and flanks
- % coverage: approximating to 10% of the total body surface area
- Type of wrap if used: A piece of surgical gauze was placed over the treatment area and semioccluded with a piece of self-adhesive bandage. The animals were caged individually for the 24-hour exposure period. Shortly after dosing the dressings were examined to ensure that they were securely in place.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: the bandage was carefully removed and the treated skin and surrounding hair wiped with cotton wool moistened with
distilled water to remove any residual test material.
- Time after start of exposure: 24h

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2000 mg / kg bw
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes

Duration of exposure:
24 h
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations: once daily
- Frequency of weighing: prior to application of the test material on day 0 and on day 7 and 14.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes, animals were killed by cervical dislocation and subjected to gross pathological examination. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight, test sites were examined for evidence of primary irritation and scored according to Draize J.H. (1977) "Dermal and Eye Toxicity Tests" In: Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the Toxicity of Household Substances, National Academy 01 Sciences, Washington DC p. 31.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: No mortality. No signs of systemic toxicity.
Mortality:
There were no deaths.
Clinical signs:
other: No signs of systemic toxicity were noted during the study. Orange-coloured staining caused by the test material was noted at the treated skin sites of all animals and prevented an evaluation of the degree of erythema on Day 1. No signs of skin irritation
Gross pathology:
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Other findings:
Signs of toxicity (local):
On day 1, scoring for erythema due to orange staining was not possible. No signs of dermal irritation were detected until the end of the study.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Mean body weight

 

 

Mean

SD*

Day 0

Males

213.4

5.22

 

Females

208.6

8.62

Day 7

Males

256.6

18.37

 

Females

221.6

9.29

Day 14

Males

311.4

23.16

 

Females

238

11.98

Table 2: Body weight gain (g) during week 1 and 2

 

 

Mean

SD*

Week 1

Males

43.2

15.91

 

Females

13.0

3.61

Week 2

Males

54.8

14.81

 

Females

16.4

3.51

* standard deviation

Applicant's summary and conclusion