Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
December 1991 to January 1992
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted according to OECD guideline under GLP
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1992
Report date:
1992

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
not relevant
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
other: Magnusson & Kligmann maximisation study

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
308 AQN
IUPAC Name:
308 AQN
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Thirty-six female, albino Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs were supplied by David Hall Limited, Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire, U.K. At start of the main study the animals weighed 328 - 419g, and were approximately eight to twelve weeks old. After a minimum acclimatisation period of five days, each animal was selected at random and given a number unique within the study which was written on a small area of clipped rump using a black indelible marker-pen.

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Concentration / amount:
PRETEST:
Intradermal induction: 1%, 5%
Topical induction: 5%, 10%, 25%, 50%
Topical challenge: 5%, 10%, 25%, 50%
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Concentration / amount:
PRETEST:
Intradermal induction: 1%, 5%
Topical induction: 5%, 10%, 25%, 50%
Topical challenge: 5%, 10%, 25%, 50%
No. of animals per dose:
PRETEST:
Intradermal induction: 2
Topical induction: 2
Topical challenge: 2
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: four preparations of the test material (50, 25, 10 and 5%) were allpied occlusively to both flanks for 24 hours.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- Site: intradermal injections
- Frequency of applications: 1
- Concentrations: see above

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- Site: both flanks, clipped
- Concentrations: see above
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48h
Challenge controls:
no
Positive control substance(s):
no

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Not available

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
2 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 2 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
2 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 2 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

No signs of sensitisation were found.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: EEC labeling
Conclusions:
The test material, No. 308 AQN, produced a 0% (0/20) sensitisation rate and was classified as a non-sensitiser to quinea pig skin.
Executive summary:

The test material, No. 308 AQN, produced a 0% (0/20) sensitisation rate and was classified as a non-sensitiser to quinea pig skin.

The test material was also classified as a non-sensitiser according to ECC labeling regulations. No risk phrase is therefore required.