Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: other: clastogenicity
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2011-05-19 to 2011-07-26
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: guideline study under GLP conditions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, München, Germany
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Dihydro-3-(tripropenyl)furan-2,5-dione
EC Number:
295-556-6
EC Name:
Dihydro-3-(tripropenyl)furan-2,5-dione
Cas Number:
92077-08-2
IUPAC Name:
92077-08-2
Test material form:
other: liquid
Details on test material:
Name: Tripropenyl succinic anhydride
Product: Genopur ASA
CAS No.: 92077-08-2
Batch No.: ESD0010823
Chemical Name: dihydro-3-(tripropenyl)furan-2,5-dione
Molecular Weight: 220 g/mol (calculated based on the given chemical structure)
pH: 1-2
Physical State at RT: liquid
Density: 1.01 g/cm3 (20°C, DIN 51757)
Colour: yellow to brown
Expiry Date: 01.12.2012
Storage Conditions: at room temperature

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: MEM
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Liver S9 of Wistar phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone-induced rat liver S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Pre-experiment:
with and without metabolic activation: 0.02, 0.039, 0.078, 0.16, 0.31, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mM

Experiment I:
without metabolic activation: 2, 3 and 4 mM
with metabolic activation: 8, 9 and 10 mM


Experiment II:
without metabolic activation: 0.5, 1 and 2 mM
with metabolic activation: 8.5, 9.5 and 10 mM
Vehicle / solvent:
-Vehicle (s)/solvent(s) used: cell culture medium
-Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Due to the nature of the test item it was suspended in cell culture medium (MEM) followed by ultrasonic for 10 minutes. The solvent was compatible with the survival of the cells and the S9 activity.

Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
ethylmethanesulphonate
Remarks:
without metabolic activation

Migrated to IUCLID6: 400 and 600 µg/mL
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
with metabolic activation

Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.83 µg/mL
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
TREATMENT TIME:
4 hours (Experiment I with and without metabolic activation, experiment II with metabolic activation)
20 hours (Experiment II without metabolic activation)

FIXATION INTERVAL: 20 hours (Experiment I and II with and without metabolic activation)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 independent experiments
NUMBER OF CELLS SEEDED: 1 x 10^4 - 5 x 10^4 cells
NUMBER OF CULTURES: two cultures per concentration
NUMBER OF CELLS SCORED: 200 cells per concentration (100 cells per culture)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: Mitotic index, cell density
Evaluation criteria:
There are several criteria for determining a positive result:
- a clear and dose-related increase in the number of cells with aberrations,
- a biologically relevant response for at least one of the dose groups, which is higher than the laboratory negative control range (0.0% - 4.0% aberrant cells (with and without metabolic activation)).


Statistics:
According to OECD guidelines, the biological relevance of the results is the criterion for the interpretation of results, a statistical evaluation of the results is not regarded as necessary.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Results of chromosome analysis

Without metabolic activation

   Cytotoxicity Chromatid aberrations         Isochromatid aberrations       rel. Mitotic index (%) rel. Cell density (%)  Poly-ploidy mean % aberrant cells
 gaps breaks  inter-changes  other  gaps breaks  inter-changes  other incl. Gaps excl. Gaps
 Experiment I                              
negative control - 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 2 3.5 1.5
2 mM no 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 78 87 1 1.5 0.5
3 mM yes 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 70 2 3.0 1.0
4 mM yes 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 34 66 2 4.0 1.5
5 mM yes - - - - - - - - 4 52  - - -
EMS (600 µg/mL) - 17  18   2  2  1  0  1  5 95 93  3 15.5 11.5
 Experiment II                                  
negative control - 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 2 2.0 0.5
0.5 mM no 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 97 112 1 0.5 0.0
1.0 mM no 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 95 97 1 1.5 1.0
2.0 mM yes 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 91 0 2.0 1.0
3.0 mM yes - - - - - - - - 21 63 - - -
EMS (400 µg/mL) - 8 13 4 0 0 0 0 3 44 87 1 12.0 8.5

 

Table 2: Results of chromosome analysis

With metabolic activation

   Cytotoxicity Chromatid aberrations         Isochromatid aberrations       rel. Mitotic index (%) rel. Cell density (%)  Poly-ploidy mean % aberrant cells
 gaps breaks  inter-changes  other  gaps breaks  inter-changes  other incl. Gaps excl. Gaps
 Experiment I                              
negative control - 3 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 100 100 0 4.5 2.5
8 mM no 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 94 1 2.0 0.0
9 mM no 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 80 86 2 2.0 1.0
10 mM yes 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 56 94 5 4.5 3.0
CPA (0.83 µg/mL) - 5 10 8 3 2 1 3 0 103 90 2 12.5 11.0
 Experiment II                                  
negative control - 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 3.0 1.5
8.5 mM no 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 73 0 2.0 0.5
9.5 mM no 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 99 82 0 4.0 2.5
10.0 mM no 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 76 85 2 3.0 1.5
CPA (0.83 µg/mL) - 5 12 7 0 0 1 1 1 94 81 2 11.5 9.5

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

During the described in vitro chromosomal aberration test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item, which is a category member (Tripropenyl succinic anhydride (TSA)), did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations in the V79 Chinese hamster cell line. Therefore, the test item Tripropenyl succinic anhydride is considered to be non-clastogenic. Data can be read-across among members of the C8-12 Alkenyl Succinic Anhydrides Category, based on common functional groups, similar break-down products and potency patterns among carbon-chain length. This is adequate to fulfill the information requirements, to be the basis for classification and labelling decisions, and for risk assessment.
Executive summary:

To investigate the potential of Tripropenyl succinic anhydride to induce structural chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster V79 cells, an in vitro chromosome aberration assay was carried out.

The chromosomes were prepared 20 h after start of treatment with the test item. The treatment interval was 4 h with and without metabolic activation in experiment I. In experiment II, the treatment interval was 4 h with and 20 h without metabolic activation. Duplicate cultures were treated at each concentration. 100 metaphases per culture were scored for structural chromosomal aberrations.

Due to the nature of the test item it was suspended in cell culture medium (MEM) followed by ultrasonic for 10 minutes.

The following concentrations were evaluated for the microscopic analysis of chromosomal aberrations:

Experiment I:

without metabolic activation: 2, 3 and 4 mM

with metabolic activation: 8, 9 and 10 mM

Experiment II:

without metabolic activation: 0.5, 1 and 2 mM

with metabolic activation: 8.5, 9.5 and 10 mM

Precipitation of the test item was observed at concentrations of 3 mM and above (with and without metabolic activation). In the presence of S9 mix, less toxicity of the test item, compared to the experiment without metabolic activation, was found. Consequently, in the experiments with metabolic activation precipitation was noted at all concentrations evaluated.

In experiment I without metabolic activation toxic effects of the test item were observed at concentrations of 3 mM and higher, with metabolic activation at the highest concentration of 10 mM.

In experiment II without metabolic activation, toxic effects of the test item were observed at concentrations of 2 mM and higher. With metabolic activation no toxic effects of the test item were noted.

In the experiments I and II no biologically relevant increase of the aberration rates was noted after treatment with the test item with and without metabolic activation. The aberration rates of all dose groups evaluated were within the historical control data of the negative control.

In both experiments with and without metabolic activation no biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of polyploid cells was found after treatment with the test item as compared to the controls.

EMS (400 and 600 µg/mL) and CPA (0.83 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and induced distinct and biologically relevant increases in cells with structural chromosomal aberrations.

This study is classified as acceptable. This study satisfies the requirement for Test Guideline OPPTS 870.5375; OECD 473 for in vitro cytogenetic mutagenicity data.