Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 239-556-6 | CAS number: 15520-10-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 29 JUL 2003 to 10 OCT 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
- Report date:
- 2003
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Pursuant to the Netherlands GLP Compliance Monitoring Programme and according to Directive 88/320/EEC
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-methylpentane-1,5-diamine
- EC Number:
- 239-556-6
- EC Name:
- 2-methylpentane-1,5-diamine
- Cas Number:
- 15520-10-2
- Molecular formula:
- C6H16N2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methylpentane-1,5-diamine
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Dytek A (MPMD)
- Substance type: colourless to slightly yellow, clear liquid
- Physical state: fluid
- Analytical purity: 98.88 %
- Lot/batch No.: M200170A
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2004-01-15
- Storage condition of test material: ambient temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase (TK)-locus on chromosome 11 of cultured mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 (with HEPES and Glutamax-I) supplemented with heat-inactivated horse serum, sodium pyruvate and penicillin/streptomycin
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I (with and without metabolic activation): 10, 6.5, 4.2, 2.7, 1.8, 1.2, 0.58, 0.29, 0.15, 0.073, 0.036, 0.018, and 0.009 and 0.0 mmol/l
Experiment II (without metabolic activation): 6.3, 5.4, 4.6, 3.9, 2.7, 1.9, 1.3, and 0.0 mmol/l
in parallel: 6.3, 5.4, 4.6 mmol/l with pH adjusted solutions
Experiment II (with metabolic activation): 10, 8.5, 7.2, 6.1, 4.3, 3.0, and 2.1 mmol/l
in parallel: 10, 8.5, 7.2 mmol/l with pH adjusted solutions - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: culture medium
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 3-methylcholanthrene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 24 h (experiment I), 4 h (experiment II)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 44-48 h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-14 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): trifluorothymidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: In experiment I single cultures (except for the vehicle control which had two cultures) were used. In experiment II duplicate cultures were used.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth (RTG)
OTHER: pH adjustment was done using 5N HCl (starting with stock solution of 25 mmol/l). pH was adjusted to 7.9 at a concentration of 10 mmol/l in the final culture medium. - Evaluation criteria:
- A response was considered to be positive if the induced mutant frequency (mutant frequency of the test substance minus that of the vehicle negative control) was more than 100 mutants per 1,000,000 clonable cells (Aaron et al, 1994; Clive et al., 1995). A response was considered to be equivocal if the induced mutant frequency was more than 50 mutants per 1,000,000 clonable cells. Any apparent increase in mutant frequency at concentrations of the test substance causing more than 90% cytotoxicity was considered to be an artefact and not indicative of genotoxicity.
The test substance was considered to be mutagenic in the gene mutation test at the TK-locus if a concentration-related increase in mutant frequency was observed, or if a reproducible positive response for at least one of the test substance concen¬trations was observed.
The test substance was considered not to be mutagenic in the gene mutation test at the TK-locus if it produced neither a dose-related increase in the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points. - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- details see below
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In the presence of S9-mix the relative initial growth and the RTG were decreased above 4.3 mmol/l. The relative total growth at the highest concentration evaluated for mutagenicity was 11 ± 3%.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- details see below
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- The relative total growth at the highest concentration was not decreased, but the initial cell yield was below 10%. After pH adjustment at the highest concentration (5.4 mmol/l) less toxicity was observed and no increase of the mutant frequency.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Historical data on negative and positive controls are available.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Dytek A (MPMD) was cytotoxic in both the absence and presence of S9-mix. In the absence of S9-mix, the initial cell yield was decreased above a concentration of 2.7 mmol/l; the relative total growth (RTG) was not decreased in any culture that survived the treatment. The initial cell yield at the highest concentration evaluated for mutagenicity (5.4 mmol/l) was 7.9 ±3.6%. After pH-adjustment Dytek A (MPMD) was less cytotoxic; the initial cell yield at 5.4 mmol/l was 56 ±2%. In the presence of S9-mix, the initial cell yield and RTG were decreased above 4.3 mmol/l Dytek A (MPMD). The RTG at the highest concentration evaluated for mutagenicity (7.2 mmol/l) was 11 ± 3%. After pH-adjustment Dytek A (MPMD) was less cytotoxic. The RTG at 7.2 mmol/l was 64 ±13% and at 10 mmol/l it was 67 ±0.3%. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Mutagenicity
In the absence of S9-mix in the first assay the mutant frequency was increased by more than 50 mutants per 1,000,000 clonable cells compared to the negative control at two single concentrations of Dytek A (MPMD). At 4.2 and 1.8 mmol/l the mutant frequencies were increased by 51 and 76 mutants per 1,000,000 clonable cells, respectively, above the negative control. In the second assay, in which duplicate cultures were used, no increase of the mutant frequency was observed at any dose level. The RTG at the highest concentration was not decreased, but the initial cell yield was below 10%. After pH adjustment at the highest concentration (5.4 mmol/l) less toxicity was observed and no increase of the mutant frequency.
In the presence of S9-mix in the first assay in a single culture at 6.5 mmol/l the mutant frequency was increased by 72 mutants per 1,000,000 clonable cells above the negative control. In the second assay at 3.0 mmol/l the mutant frequency of one of the duplicate cultures was increased by 646 mutants per 1,000,000 clonable cells above the negative control. In the accompanying culture at 3.0 mmol/l and in all other cultures tested, no increase of the mutant frequency was observed. The RTG at the highest concentration was 11 ± 3%. No clear explanation could be found for the extreme high value of the mutant frequency in the single culture at 3.0 mmol/l. The results in the same concentration range considered, in both the first and second assay, the inexplicable value is regarded to be an artefact. After pH adjustment, the mutagenicity could be evaluated at higher concentrations. At 10 mmol/l no increase of the mutant frequency was observed.
The observed increases of the mutant frequencies in single cultures in the first assay were not confirmed in the second assay. Therefore these increases were
considered to be fortuitous and not indicative of mutagenicity.
Colony sizing
In both the absence and the presence of S9-mix the number of large and small colonies formed at concentrations causing an increase in mutant frequency was more or less equal.
Positive and negative controls
Methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) and 3-methylcholanthrene (MCA) were used as positive control substances in the absence and in the presence of the S9-mix, respectively. Treatment with the positive controls yielded the expected significant increase in mutant frequency compared to the negative controls. The negative controls were within acceptable ranges.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test the test substance did not induce mammalian cell gene mutations in a mouse lymphoma cell line.
- Executive summary:
In an OECD 476 guideline study induction of mammalian cell gene mutations in vitro has been investigated in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells in the presence (rat liver S9) and absence of metabolic activation. Concentration tested were in Experiment I (with and without metabolic activation): 10, 6.5, 4.2, 2.7, 1.8, 1.2, 0.58, 0.29, 0.15, 0.073, 0.036, 0.018, 0.009 and 0.0 mmol/l in Experiment II (without metabolic activation): 6.3, 5.4, 4.6, 3.9, 2.7, 1.9, 1.3, and 0.0 mmol/l (in parallel: 6.3, 5.4, 4.6 mmol/l with pH adjusted solutions) and in Experiment II (with metabolic activation): 10, 8.5, 7.2, 6.1, 4.3, 3.0, and 2.1 mmol/l (in parallel: 10, 8.5, 7.2 mmol/l with pH adjusted solutions). The test item did not induce gene mutations in concentrations up to 10 mmol/l under the tested conditions. Treatment with the respective positive control substances yielded the expected significant increase in mutant frequency compared to negative controls. Negative controls were within the accepted range.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.