Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 232-227-8 | CAS number: 7790-86-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
The key study (Hefner, 2013) yielded a 72-h NOEC and EC50 value (growth rate-based) of 0.46 and 0.63 mg Ce/L, respectively, for the unicellular green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (i.e., 0.81 and 1.1 mg CeCl3/L, respectively). However, these values will not be taken forward to PNEC derivation because the effects on growth were observed to be concurrent with phosphate depletion in the test medium due to complexation with cerium, suggesting that the observed effect on growth inhibition is due to phosphate deprivation rather than direct toxicity of the rare earth. This is confirmed by modelling calculations using Visual MINTEQ v3.0. Further testing is not considered useful because the technical issue of phosphate depletion cannot be overcome (phosphate dosing during the test would result in 100% cerium depletion from the test medium). Finally, the results will not be used for classification purposes of CeCl3 either.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Three studies on the toxicity of cerium to algae were included in this dossier.
The first study of Bringmann and Kühn (1969) investigated the effects of CeCl3 on growth of Scenedesmus algae. The lowest concentration at which cerium exerted an adverse effect on biomass (growth) was 0.15-0.20 mg Ce/L. Results can however not be considered reliable because cerium concentrations in test media were not analytically verified, and because it is not clear to what extent the observed effect was an indirect effect such as a phosphate deprivation effect.
In a second study (Tai et al., 2010), the toxicity of cerium (added as Ce(NO3)3) to the marine unicellular alga Skeletonema costatum was investigated in a 72-h growth inhibition study. The 72-h EC50 of cerium was reported to be 4.16 mg Ce/L. However, since no analytical verification of test substance or element concentrations was performed, results can not be considered reliable. Further, it is not clear to what extent the observed effects were due to phosphate deprivation.
The third study is the study of Hefner (2013). This study was a 72-h algal growth inhibition test with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata in which CeCl3 was used as test item. The growth rate-based 72-h EC50 and NOEC were 0.63 and 0.46 mg Ce/L (i.e., 1.1 and 0.81 mg CeCl3/L), respectively.
Due to the known issue with phosphate complexing by rare earth elements in algal growth inhibition tests, phosphate concentrations were monitored during this study. It was observed that at the lower test concentrations, all cerium was precipitated shortly after addition to the test medium, because phosphate was in excess. However, at the higher test concentrations, cerium was in excess, complexing all phosphate in the test medium. Algal growth was completely impeded at those test concentrations where all phosphate had disappeared from the test medium from the start of the test already. The ErC50 value (0.63 mg Ce/L) was therefore somewhat lower than the lowest test concentration at which complete immediate phosphate depletion occurred. Therefore, the observed effects are considered to be mostly due to phosphate deprivation instead of direct cerium toxicity. Since all algal growth inhibition tests need to be performed in test media containing a phosphate source, testing is considered technically not feasible if reliable results on cerium toxicity to algae are to be obtained. Further, the phosphate depletion effect is not considered an environmentally relevant effect, since it would only occur very locally where point source emissions or accidental releases occur, and will never affect an entire ecosystem. Therefore, the effects on algal growth are not taken into account for PNEC derivation and classification. As the study was well conducted and the "phosphate issue" was investigated, it is totally justified to attribute a Klimisch score of 1 to the study.
To further argument the conclusion that the observed toxicity is due to disappearance of phosphate from the test medium as a result of complexing with the rare earth, modelling calculations have been performed using Visual MINTEQ v3.0 using data from the algal growth inhibition study of Hefner (2013). Modelling of cerium speciation was performed as follows:
- All components of the test medium (nominal concentrations) were added to the modelling solution.
- The pH was set to 7.0 (although pH of test solutions was adjusted to 6.5, at the start of testing pH was around 7.0 in most treatments).
- Ionic strength was not set to a fixed value, but the model was allowed to calculate it (default).
- Temperature was set to 23°C (average temperature during the test).
- Five 'modelling problems' were added, using set total cerium levels (i.e., the measured dissolved Ce levels at test initiation: 0.198, 0.46, 0.943, 2.01 and 4.48 mg Ce/L). For each 'modelling problem' the program should then calculate speciation in the test medium.
- The following aqueous Ce species were modelled by Visual MINTEQ: Ce3+, Ce(CO3)2-, CeCO3+, CeHCO3+2, Ce(SO4)2-, CeSO4+, CeCl+2, CeEDTA-, CeHEDTA, CeOH+2, CePO4, and CeH2PO4+2.
- Two possible solid phases were added for Ce: Ce(OH)3 and CePO4. When solubility products are exceeded in the aqueous solution, the model allows precipitation of these phases. The model does not contain (by default) other solid phases for Ce, although especially at higher pH levels some carbonate precipitation may be expected too. For the modelling exercise presented here, the absence of possible cerium carbonate solid phases does not affect the outcome of the calculations. Note that the nominally added total phosphate (PO4 3-, total) concentration is 1.18E-05 M, hence no more CePO4 than that can be formed.
- Under the abovementioned conditions, the model calculations for dissolved versus precipitated Ce and phosphate can be summarised as follows (measured dissolved Ce at the end of testing was added for comparison):
Ce total (initial measured Ce dissolved) (mg/L) | Ce dissolved (model calculation) (mg/L) | % Ce dissolved (model calculation) | Ce dissolved (measured after 72 h) (mg/L) | % PO4 3- precipitated (model calculation) |
0.198 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0017 | 11.95 |
0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | < LOQ | 27.80 |
0.943 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.022 | 57.03 |
2.01 | 0.35 | 17.43 | 0.738 | 100 |
4.48 | 2.83 | 63.18 | 2.96 | 100 |
- Ce(OH)3 was not calculated to precipitate under the set conditions of testing, only CePO4 precipitation occurred. Further, when checking phosphate speciation, it became clear that phosphate precipitation was practically entirely due to precipitation with cerium.
- Based on this modelling exercise it is confirmed that under the conditions of the test all cerium is precipitated as CePO4 whenever phosphate is in excess and vice versa. The good agreement between measured dissolved Ce concentrations at the end of testing and the modelled dissolved Ce concentrations further increase the credibility of the model calculations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.