Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 216-341-5 | CAS number: 1561-92-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: relatively old study. predating GLP. Yet according to OECD protocol at a renowned lab.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- OECD guideline of 1981-05-12
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- other: Albino, BOR: BHPW
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: F. Winkelman, 4779 Borchen, DE
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation:
- Housing:
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):
- Acclimation period:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):
- Humidity (%):
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: - Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction: intradermal 5%
Induction epicutaneous: 25%
challenge: 25% - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction: intradermal 5%
Induction epicutaneous: 25%
challenge: 25% - No. of animals per dose:
- 20
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS: not applicable
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Exposure period: day 1-day 14
- Test groups: 1 (20 females
- Control group:1 (1 females)
- Site: both shoulders
- Frequency of applications: intradermal once, epicutaneous once
- Duration: interdadermal: instantaneous. epicutaneous: 48 hrs
- Concentrations: intradermal 5%, epicutaneous 25%
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 1 day, starting at day 21
- Exposure period: 24 hrs
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site flanks :
- Concentrations: 25%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hrs after end-of-challenge
OTHER: - Challenge controls:
- 10 animals, same site, dosage and duration as test animals
- Positive control substance(s):
- no
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- nothing abnormal noted
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25% . No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: nothing abnormal noted.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- nothing abnormal noted
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: nothing abnormal noted.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- nothing abnormal noted
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25% . No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: nothing abnormal noted.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- nothing abnormal noted
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25% . No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: nothing abnormal noted.
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- sodium methallylsulfonate is not a sensitiser
- Executive summary:
sodium methallylsulfonate was tested for skin sensitising properties in a Magnusson-Kligmann skin sensitisation test. 20 female animals were induced with a 5% concentration intradermally and a 25% concetration epicutaneously, with and without Frund's complete adjuvant. (water and CFA respectively only in 10 controls) . After epicutaneous challenge 14 days after, none of the test animals and none of the controls showed any sign of redness or edema at 24 and 48 hours after challenge. The test substance is not a skin sensitiser.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
- Migrated from Short description of key information:
0/20 test animals and 0/10 controls showed signs of redness or edema . Not a sensitiser
Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
OECD protocol study
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
key study shows that the substance is not a skin sensitiser in a maximisation test. Therefore it must not be classified
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.