Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
01 Dec 2011 - 13 Dec 2011
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study according to EU and OECD methods

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.4 (Vapour Pressure)
Version / remarks:
(2008)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
Version / remarks:
(2006)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Department of Health, UK GLP Monitoring Authority (2011)
Type of method:
effusion method: vapour pressure balance

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
bis(4-tert-butylphenyl)iodanium; hexafluoro-λ⁵-phosphanuide
EC Number:
620-341-4
Cas Number:
61358-25-6
Molecular formula:
C20H26F6IP
IUPAC Name:
bis(4-tert-butylphenyl)iodanium; hexafluoro-λ⁵-phosphanuide
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): PF-6
- Chemical name: Bis(4-tert-butylphenyl)iodonium Hexafluorophosphate
- Physical state: white powder
- Analytical purity: 99.2 %
- Batch No.: 20101020
- Expiration date of the batch: 12 April 2012
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark

Results and discussion

Vapour pressure
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
< 0 Pa

Any other information on results incl. tables

No statistical analyses were performed because the balance readings were too low and variable for a line of best fit to have any meaning. Instead it was considered more appropriate to impose a regression slope on a chosen data point to provide an estimate of the maximum value for the vapour pressure at 25 °C.

 

Run 10 was chosen because the sample had been under vacuum for the longest period prior to this run and so degassing would have been the most complete. The reading at 143 °C (416.15 K) was chosen because this is the data point which gives the highest estimated vapour pressure at any given temperature when a slope of -1500 K is imposed upon it.

 

The value of -1500 K is an in-house value and is the shallowest slope observed whilst determining the vapour pressure on a wide range of samples using the vapour pressure balance method. Extrapolation to 25 °C gave a vapour pressure of 2.573 x 10-4 Pa which has been taken as a maximum for this material.

 

The test item did not change in appearance under the conditions used in the determination.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The vapour pressure of the test item has been determined to be < 2.6 x 10^-4 Pa at 25 °C.