Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Comparable to guideline study (see also: SIDS documents in section 13; Iuclid reference [27]; Reliability assigned: 1)

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007
Reference Type:
other: summary of toxicity studies
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1997
Report date:
1997

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
fixed dose procedure
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,5,5-trimethylhexan-1-ol
EC Number:
222-376-7
EC Name:
3,5,5-trimethylhexan-1-ol
Cas Number:
3452-97-9
Molecular formula:
C9H20O
IUPAC Name:
3,5,5-trimethylhexan-1-ol
Details on test material:
- Analytical purity: 97.2 %
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 3, 5, 5-trimethylhexan-1-ol
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: 97.2 %
- Source: Kyowa Yuka Ltd., Japan
- Lot/batch No.: 707173
- Stability under test conditions: confirmed
- Storage condition of test material: in the dark, air-tight containers, refrigerated

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Crj: CD(SD)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Japan Charles River Co.
- Age at study initiation: 5-6 weeks old for both sexs
- Weight at study initiation: mean 156.7 g (149-165 g) for males; mean 133.9 g (126-144 g) for females
- Fasting period before study: 17 to 18 hours
- Housing: in groups of 5 animals in metal cages
- Accimatisation: no data

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23 ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 10 %,
- Air changes (per hr): 10 to 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
olive oil
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 40 % test substance (w/v %)
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): dose volume 5 mL/kg bw
- Lot/batch no. (if required):
- Purity: pharmaceutical grade (Japan Pharmacopoiea)


MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED:
5 mL/kg bw
Doses:
Definitive study: 2000 mg/kg bw
Selected based on results of preliminary study: 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: observations daily until day 14; animals were weighed on days 1, 3, 5, 10 and 14 after the drug was administered
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: histopathology (organs examined: liver, kidneys, spleen, heart, lungs, brain (cerebrum, cerebellum), stomach (anterior stomach, glandular stomach), duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, rectum and ovaries, testes, epididymis)
Statistics:
not needed

Results and discussion

Preliminary study:
There were no deaths in the preliminary study (i.e. LD50 was >2000 mg/kg bw); clinical sign (reduced movements) was seen after dosing, but was reversible within one day; significantly reduced body weight was seen in males throughout days 1-14, in females on days 1-3; there were no histopathological changes noted.
Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: no death occurred
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: no death occurred
Mortality:
No death occurred of either males or females
Clinical signs:
other: A decrease in spontaneous motor activity was observed; this was reversible on the day of administration.
Gross pathology:
No changes were detected on autopsy or histopathological examination.
Other findings:
- Histopathology: no changes noted
- Potential target organs: none identified

Any other information on results incl. tables

No deaths occurred of either males or females and the LD50 was estimated to be more than 2000 mg/kg bw. A reversible decrease in spontaneous motor activity was observed on the day of administration, and body weight gains were suppressed or tended to be suppressed from days 1 to 14 of administration in males and females. No changes were detected on autopsy or histopathological examination.

LD50: Male, > 2000 mg/kg bw; female, > 2000 mg/kg bw

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
relatively harmless
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The acute oral LD50 (oral, rat, 14 days) was >2000 mg/kg body weight. No target organ could be identified.
Executive summary:

The acute oral LD50 (oral, rat, 14 days) of 3, 5, 5 -trimethylhexan-1-ol was >2000 mg/kg body weight in a study conducted according to OECD TG 401 and under GLP conditions using groups of 5 rats per sex and dose in a preliminary study (0, 500, 1000, 2000 mg/kg bw) and in the definitive study (2000 mg/kg bw).

No deaths occurred of either males or females. A reversible decrease in spontaneous motor activity was observed on the day of administration, and body weight gains were suppressed or tended to be suppressed from days 1 to 14 of administration in males and females. No changes were detected on autopsy or histopathological examination, i.e. a target organ could not be identified (Yoshimura et al., 2007).

The study is considered to be acceptable for assessment.