Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 2020-02-11 to 2020-03-31
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2020

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Version / remarks:
December 2001
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Version / remarks:
May 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Version / remarks:
December 2002
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-chloro-N-[2-methoxy-4-(morpholin-4-yl)-5-nitrophenyl]pyrimidin-2-amine
Cas Number:
2270944-70-0
Molecular formula:
C15H16ClN5O4
IUPAC Name:
4-chloro-N-[2-methoxy-4-(morpholin-4-yl)-5-nitrophenyl]pyrimidin-2-amine
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch number of test material: I19GD2024
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2021-08-06
- Physical Description: Orange powder
- Purity test date: 2019-11-18

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature
- Stability under storage conditions: not indicated
- Stability under test conditions: not indicated
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/dispersant/vehicle/test medium: not indicated

OTHER SPECIFICS
- Correction factor: 1

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: female rats (nulliparous and non-pregnant), Wistar strain Crl:WI (Han) (outbred, SPF-Quality); Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: approximately 8-9 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 153-180 grams
- Fasting period before study: animals were deprived of food overnight (for a maximum of 20 hours) prior to dosing and until 3-4 hours after administration of the test item. Water was available.
- Housing: group housed (up to 3 animals per of the same sex and same dosing group together) in polycarbonate labeled cages (Makrolon MIV type; height 18 cm.) containing sterilized sawdust as bedding material (Lignocel S 8-15, JRS - J.Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + CO. KG, Rosenberg, Germany) equipped with water bottles. For psychological/environmental enrichment, animals were provided with paper (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom), except when interrupted by study procedures/activities.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, free access to pelleted rodent diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, free access to municipal tap water via water bottles.
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before the commencement of dosing.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-24 °C
- Humidity (%): 40-70%
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From:2020-02-24 To:2020-03-31

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 30 or 200 mg/mL.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10mL/kg
- Justification for choice of vehicle: Trial preparations were performed to select the suitable vehicle and to establish a suitable formulation procedure. The vehicle was chosen from (in order of preference): water (Elix) (not homogeneous), 1% aq. carboxymethyl cellulose (not homogeneous), propylene glycol (not homogeneous), polyethylene glycol 400 (not homogeneous) and corn oil (homogeneous orange suspension). There was no information available regarding the solubility or stability in vehicle. These trials were not performed as part of this study and these preparations were not used for dosing.

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 mL/kg

DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual):
- Test item dosing formulations (w/w) were homogenized to visually acceptable levels at appropriate concentrations to meet dose level requirements.
The dosing formulations were kept at room temperature until dosing. The dosing formulations were stirred until and during dosing. No correction was made for purity of the test item.

CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: The dose levels were based on the OECD test guidelines and were selected from the series 5 (lowest dose level), 50, 300 and 2000 (highest dose level) mg/kg body weight. The starting dose level should be the one that is likely to produce mortality in at least some of the animals and was selected based on available toxicity data of the test item.
Doses:
300 or 2000 mg/kg body weight (single dosage)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3 females per dose, 3 groups in total
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days (until day 15)
- Frequency of observations and weighing:
mortality/moribundity: twice daily, in the morning and at the end of the working day. Animals were not removed from cage during observation, unless necessary for identification or confirmation of possible findings. Animals showing pain, distress or discomfort, which was considered not transient in nature or was likely to become more severe, were sacrificed for humane reasons based on OECD guidance document on humane endpoints (ENV/JM/MONO/ 2000/7). The time of death was recorded as precisely as possible;
body weights: days 1 (pre-dose), 8 and 15. A fasted weight was recorded on the day of dosing;
clinical signs: at periodic intervals on the day of dosing (at least three times) (day 1) and once daily thereafter. The observation period was 14 days. All the animals were examined for reaction to dosing. The onset, intensity and duration of these signs was recorded (if appropriate). Signs were graded for severity and the maximum grade was predefined at 3 or 4. Grades were coded as slight (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (grade 3) and very severe (grade 4). For certain signs, only its presence (grade 1) or absence (grade 0) was scored.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes, animals surviving until scheduled euthanasia were sacrificed by oxygen/carbon dioxide procedure. All animals assigned to the study were subjected to necropsy and descriptions of all internal macroscopic abnormalities recorded.
Statistics:
No statistical analysis was performed.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occurred.
Clinical signs:
other:
Body weight:
other body weight observations
Remarks:
The body weight gain shown by the animals over the study period was considered to be similar to that expected for normal untreated animals of the same age and strain. The incidence of reduced body weight gain between Days 8 and 15 in one individual animal at 300 mg/kg (no. 2) was considered not indicative of toxicity, based on the absence of any corroborative findings in this animal.
Gross pathology:
Abnormalities of the thymus (dark red foci multifocal on the left side, one animal at 300 mg/kg) and of the liver (dark black foci multifocal lateral lobe, one animal at 2000 mg/kg) were found at macroscopic post mortem examination, which are more often seen in rats of this strain in this kind of studies and therefore no toxicological relevance was attached to these findings. Macroscopic post mortem examination of the other animals at termination did not reveal any abnormalities.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Number of dead animals in each test group with 3 animals each:
Females 300 mg/kg: 0
Females 2000 mg/kg: 0
Females 2000 mg/kg: 0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The oral LD50 value of JNJ-73848242-AAA (T003901) in Wistar Han rats was established to exceed 2000 mg/kg body weight According to the OECD 423 test guideline, the LD50 cut-off value was considered to exceed 5000 mg/kg body weight. Based on these results, JNJ-73848242-AAA (T003901) does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for acute oral toxicity according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2017) (including all amendments) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments).