Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
- Ames Test (OECD 471, GLP, K, rel. 2): non mutagenic up to the maximum concentration in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 & E.coli WP2uvrA.
- Chromosome aberration test (OECD 473, K, rel. 2): non clastogenic up to cytotoxic concentrations.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 March to 06 April 2009
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- GLP study conducted in compliance with OECD Guideline No. 471 without any deviation. The substance is adequately identified, but some data on composition is missing. Therefore validation applies with restrictions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 21 July 1997
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-Aminoanthracene was used as the sole indicator of the efficacy of the S9-mix. No information on the characterisation of S9 with a mutagen that requires metabolic activation by microsomal enzymes has been included in the report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- Directive 2000/32/EC
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Inspected on 2007-07-18 / Signed on 2007-07-26
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: Stable in ethanol at room temperature
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 10% v/v S9 fraction; rat liver microsome fraction (S9)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Mutagenicity test:
Main test: 0.06, 0.19, 0.56, 1.67 and 5 μL/plate in TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and WP2(pKM101) with and without S9 under the direct plate incorporation method.
Confirmation test: 0.06, 0.19, 0.56, 1.67 and 5 μL/plate in TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and WP2(pKM101) with and without S9 under the pre-incubation method. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- SOURCE OF TESTER STRAINS: Master and working bacterial banks were prepared from lyophilized bacterial discs. Stock plates were stored at -80 ± 10 ºC.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) and preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min at 37 °C
- Exposure duration: 37 °C for 72 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates/dose
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: A reduction in the number of colonies in a dose-dependent manner compared to negative control for any strain and condition might indicate cytotoxicity.
OTHER:
- After an incubation of about 72 hours at about 37 ºC, the number of colonies per plate was counted.
Data are presented as the number of colonies present per plate (mean ± standard deviation). The R ratio is calculated as follows:
R = Number of revertant colonies in the presence of the test item / Number of revertant colonies in the absence of the test item
- Sterility test: The sterility of the test item and the metabolic activation system (S9) were tested. For this purpose, the highest concentration of test item and a sample of the S9 mix were added respectively to top agar preheated at about 45 ºC and poured over minimal agar medium plates. The plates were incubated for about 72 hours at about 37 ºC. Presence or absence of colonies was observed. Bacterial growth would be an indication of microbiological contamination of the test item or S9 mix respectively.
- Solubility test: Solubility was assessed as precipitation in the final mixture under the actual test conditions. Observation of precipitation by naked eye indicates insolubility. - Evaluation criteria:
- Several criteria are used for determining a positive result: a dose-response in the range tested and / or a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations in the number of revertant colonies per plate in at least one strain with or without metabolic activation system.
Positive results from the bacterial reverse mutation test indicate that a test item induces point mutations or frame-shifts in the genome of the tested bacterial strains.
Negative results from the test indicate that under the test conditions, the test item neither mutagenic nor-pro-mutagenic in the tested experimental system. - Statistics:
- None
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- bacteria, other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: None
- Precipitation: None
- Other confounding effects: None
CYTOTOXICITY TEST:
No cytotoxic effect was observed for this test item.
MUTAGENICITY TEST:
- No concentration of the test item showed a biological significant increase (R ≥ 2.5) of the number of revertant either with or without S9 metabolic activation.
− No dose response was observed in any of the tested bacterial strains.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- Positive and negative controls showed absolute numbers of revertant colonies comparable to historical data of the test facility.
OTHERS:
- Sterility test showed no contamination during the study. - Conclusions:
- Under the test condition, test item is not mutagenic with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100, and E.coli WP2uvrA.
- Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay performed according to the OECD test guideline No. 471 and in compliance with GLP, strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100) and Escherichia coli WP2(pKM101) were exposed to the test item diluted in ethanol at the following concentrations both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system (10% v/v S9).
Main test: 0.06, 0.19, 0.56, 1.67 and 5 μL/plate in TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and WP2(pKM101) with and without S9 under the direct plate incorporation method.
Confirmation test: 0.06, 0.19, 0.56, 1.67 and 5 μL/plate in TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and WP2(pKM101) with and without S9 under the pre-incubation method.
Negative and positive control groups were also included in mutagenicity tests.
Positive and negative controls showed absolute numbers of revertant colonies comparable to historical data. All positive controls showed valid ratios (R) above 2.5.
No cytotoxic effect was observed. No concentration of the test item showed a biological significant increase (R ≥ 2.5) of the number of revertant either with or without S9 metabolic activation. No dose response was observed in any of the tested bacterial strains.
Under the test condition, test item is not mutagenic with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100, and E.coli WP2uvrA.
This study is considered as acceptable and satisfies the requirement for reverse gene mutation endpoint.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 07 March to 31 May, 2019.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- GLP study conducted according to OECD TG 473. The substance is adequately identified, but some data on composition is missing. Therefore validation applies with restrictions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Adopted 29 July 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry (METI), and Ministry of the Environmental (MOE).
- Version / remarks:
- Guidelines of 31 March 2011.
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- UK GLP Compliance Programme (Inspected on 2018-08-21 / Signed on 2018-11-19).
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Physical state: extremely pale yellow liquid
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark. - Target gene:
- Not applicable.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- For lymphocytes:
- Sex, age and number of blood donors: female, aged 28 years (preliminary toxicity test). Female, aged 29 years (Main experiment).
- Whether whole blood or separated lymphocytes were used: for each experiment, sufficient whole blood was drawn from the peripheral circulation of a non-smoking volunteer who had been previously screened for suitability.
- Whether blood from different donors were pooled or not: no, one donor for each experiment.
- Mitogen used for lymphocytes: phytohaemagglutinin (PHA).
MEDIA USED :
Cells (whole blood cultures) were grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium with HEPES buffer (MEM), supplemented “in-house” with L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, amphotericin B and 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), at approximately 37 ºC with 5 % CO2 in humidified air. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: Not applicable.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9 : Covance laboratory (Lot No. PB/βNF S9 31/08/18), stored at -196°C.
- method of preparation of S9 mix: S9 fraction was obtained from the liver homogenates of male rats treated with Phenobarbitone/Beta-naphthoflavone.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium : the final concentration of S9, when dosed at a 10% volume of S9-mix into culture media, was 2%. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- - Preliminary Toxicity Test (Cell Growth Inhibition): 0, 3.91, 7.81, 15.63, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL, 4h exposure time with and without metabolic activation followed by a 20h recovery period (4(20)-hour with (2%) and without S9-mix), and a continuous exposure of 24h without metabolic activation (24-hour without S9-mix).
Justification: The maximum dose was the maximum recommended dose level.
- Main Experiment:
0, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 64 μg/mL, 4(20)-hour without S9-mix;
0, 8, 16, 32, 64, 72, 80, 96 and 128 μg/mL, 4(20)-hour with (2%) S9-mix;
0, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 64 μg/mL, 24-hour without S9-mix.
Justification: Mitotic index data was used to estimate test item toxicity and for selection of the dose levels for the main experiment. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: the test item was insoluble in aqueous media at 20 mg/mL and dimethyl sulphoxide at 100 and 200 mg/mL. However, the test item was fully miscible in acetone at 200 mg/mL in solubility checks performed in-house
- Formulation preparation: due to the sensitivity of human lymphocytes to acetone, the formulations were prepared at twice the concentration required in culture and dosed in 50 μL aliquots. Consequently, the maximum practical concentration was 1000 μg/mL. The test item was formulated within two hours of it being applied to the test system; the test item formulations were assumed to be stable for this duration. No analysis was conducted to determine the homogeneity, concentration or stability of the test item formulation because it is not a requirement of the guidelines.
. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation.
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation (2% S9-mix).
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: quadruplicate cultures for the control; duplicate culture per dose levels
- Number of independent experiments: 2
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: Exp. 1: 4 hours (± S9) / Exp. 2: 24 hours (-S9)
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times): 24 hours
FOR CHROMOSOME ABERRATION:
- Spindle inhibitor (cytogenetic assays): Mitotic activity was arrested by addition of demecolcine (Colcemid 0.1 μg/mL), two hours before the harvest time.
- Methods of slide preparation and staining technique used including the stain used (for cytogenetic assays): After incubation with demecolcine, the cells were centrifuged, the culture medium was drawn off and discarded, and the cells re-suspended in 0.075M hypotonic KCl. After approximately fourteen minutes (including centrifugation), most of the hypotonic solution was drawn off and discarded. The cells were re-suspended and then fixed by dropping the KCl cell suspension into fresh methanol/glacial acetic acid (3:1 v/v). The fixative was changed at least three times and the cells stored at approximately 4 ºC to ensure complete fixation prior to slide preparation.
The lymphocytes were re-suspended in several mL of fresh fixative before centrifugation and re-suspension in a small amount of fixative. Several drops of this suspension were dropped onto clean, wet microscope slides and left to air dry. Each slide was permanently labeled with the appropriate identification data.
When the slides were dry, they were stained in 5 % Giemsa for 5 minutes, rinsed, dried and a cover slip applied using mounting medium.
- Number of cells spread and analysed per concentration (number of replicate cultures and total number of cells scored): Where possible 1000 cells per culture were evaluated for the incidence of metaphase cells and expressed as the mitotic index and as a percentage of the vehicle control value.
- Criteria for scoring chromosome aberrations (selection of analysable cells and aberration identification): Where possible, 300 consecutive well-spread metaphases from each concentration were counted, 600 from the vehicle control (150 per replicate), where there were at least 15 cells with aberrations (excluding gaps), slide evaluation was terminated. If the cell had 44-48 chromosomes, any gaps, breaks or rearrangements were noted according to the simplified system of Savage (1976) recommended in the 1983 UKEMS guidelines for mutagenicity testing and the ISCN (1985). Cells with chromosome aberrations were reviewed as necessary by a senior cytogeneticist prior to decoding the slides
- Determination of polyploidy / endoreplication: cells with 69 chromosomes or more were scored as polyploid cells (including endoreduplicated cells) and the incidence of polyploid cells (%) reported. Many experiments with human lymphocytes have established a range of aberration frequencies acceptable for control cultures in normal volunteer donors.
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index (MI) - Rationale for test conditions:
- Human peripheral blood lymphocytes are recognized in the OECD 473 guidelines as being a suitable cell line for the Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test.
- Evaluation criteria:
- The following criteria were used to determine a valid assay:
• The frequency of cells with structural chromosome aberrations (excluding gaps) in the vehicle control cultures was within the laboratory historical control data range.
• Concurrent positive control chemicals should induce responses that are compatible with those generated in historical positive control data base and produce a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control.
• The study was performed using all three exposure conditions using a top concentration which meets the requirements of the current testing guideline.
• The required number of cells and concentrations were analyzed. - Statistics:
- The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared, where necessary, with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher's Exact test. (Richardson et al. 1989).
A toxicologically significant response is recorded when the p value calculated from the statistical analysis of the frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps is less than 0.05 when compared to its concurrent control and there is a dose-related increase in the frequency of cells with aberrations which is reproducible. Incidences where marked statistically significant increases are observed only with gap-type aberrations will be assessed on a case by case basis. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Data of pH: No significant change in pH when the test item was added into media.
- Data of osmolality: Osmolality did not increase by more than 50 mOsm.
- Possibility of evaporation from medium: not expected (vapour pressure = 0.223 Pa at 25°C)
- Water solubility: Insoluble at 20 mg/mL.
PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TEST (CELL GROWTH INHIBITION TEST):
- A precipitate of the test item was observed in the parallel blood-free cultures at the end of the exposure, at and above 62.5 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) and at and above 125 μg/mL in the continuous exposure group and in the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the presence of S9.
- Hemolysis was observed following exposure to the test item at and above 15.63 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the absence of S9 and at and above 62.5 μg/mL in the presence of S9 and the 24-hour continuous exposure group. Hemolysis is an indication of a toxic response to the erythrocytes and not indicative of any genotoxic response to the lymphocytes.
- Microscopic assessment of the slides prepared from the exposed cultures showed that metaphase cells were present up to 31.25 and 62.5 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposures in the absence and presence of S9, respectively. The maximum dose with metaphases present in the 24-hour continuous exposure was 62.5 μg/mL. The test item induced evidence of toxicity in all three exposure groups.
The selection of the maximum dose level was based on toxicity for all three exposure groups dosed in the Main Experiment.
MAIN STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data: all of the vehicle control cultures had frequencies of cells with chromosome aberrations within the expected range.
All the positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations indicating that the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
- Results from cytotoxicity measurements:
- The qualitative assessment of the slides determined that the toxicity was similar to that observed in the Cell Growth Inhibition Test and that there were metaphases suitable for scoring present up to the maximum dose level of test item in the continuous exposure group and up to 40 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the absence of S9 and up to 72 μg/mL in the presence of S9.
- No precipitate was observed at the end of exposure in any of the exposure groups.
- Hemolysis was observed following exposure to the test item at and above 16 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the absence of S9 and at and above 64 μg/mL in the presence of S9 and the 24-hour continuous exposure group.
- In the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the absence of S9, a dose-related inhibition of mitotic index was observed where 18%, 28% and 54% mitotic inhibition was achieved at 16, 24 and 32 μg/mL, respectively. Above this dose level there were insufficient numbers of metaphases available for analysis. Therefore, the maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was 32 μg/mL because this concentration achieved optimum toxicity as defined by the OECD 473 guideline (55±5%).
- In the presence of S9, 48% inhibition of mitotic index was observed at 64 μg/mL. Above this dose level there were insufficient numbers or no metaphases available for analysis. Therefore, the maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was 64 μg/mL because this concentration achieved near optimum toxicity as defined by the OECD 473 (55±5%).
- In the 24-hour continuous exposure group, an inhibition of mitotic index of 18% and 69% was noted at 32 and 40 μg/mL, respectively. Above this dose level there were insufficient numbers of metaphases available for analysis. Therefore, the maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was 40 μg/mL because this concentration slightly exceeded optimum toxicity as defined by the OECD 473 (55±5%).
- Genotoxicity results:
- The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
- The test item did not induce a statistically significant increase in the numbers of polyploid cells at any dose level in either of the exposure groups. There was no indication of endoreduplication noted.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (mean ± standard deviation)
- Positive historical control data:
cells with aberrations (-gaps):
4(20)-hour exposure without S9%: 25.13 ± 13.14
4(20)-hour exposure with S9 (2%): 16.22 ± 7.00
24-hour exposure without S9: 26.81 ± 12.28
% cells with polyploids:
4(20)-hour exposure without S9%: 0.01 ± 0.06
4(20)-hour exposure with S9 (2%): 0.03 ± 0.12
24-hour exposure without S9: 0.02 ± 0.11
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data:
cells with aberrations (-gaps):
4(20)-hour exposure without S9%: 0.48 ± 0.40
4(20)-hour exposure with S9 (2%): 0.54 ± 0.53
24-hour exposure without S9: 0.36 ± 0.43
% cells with polyploids:
4(20)-hour exposure without S9%: 0.04 ± 0.13
4(20)-hour exposure with S9 (2%): 0.03 ± 0.10
24-hour exposure without S9: 0.02 ± 0.07 - Conclusions:
- Under test condition, test item did not induce any statistically significant increase in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations, in either the absence or presence of a liver enzyme metabolizing system. The test item was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
- Executive summary:
In an in vitro chromosome aberration test performed according to OECD Guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP, cultured human lymphocytes were exposed to test item at the following concentrations:
Preliminary Toxicity Test (Cell Growth Inhibition Test)
0, 3.91, 7.81, 15.63, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL; 4 h exposure time with and without metabolic activation followed by a 20 h recovery period (4(20)-hour with and without S9-mix), and a continuous exposure of 24 h without metabolic activation (24-hour without S9-mix)
Main experiment
4(20)-hour without S9-mix: 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 64 μg/mL;
4(20)-hour with S9 (2%): 0, 8, 16, 32, 64, 72, 80, 96 and 128 μg/mL
24-hour without S9-mix: 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 64 μg/mL;
Mitotic activity was arrested by addition of colcemid at 0.1 μg/mL for each culture, two hours before the harvest. The cells were then treated with a hypotonic solution, fixed, stained and examined for mitotic indices and chromosomal aberrations. Vehicle and positive controls were also included in this test.
All vehicle (Acetone) controls had frequencies of cells with aberrations within the range expected for normal human lymphocytes. All the positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations indicating that the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9- mix were validated.
The test item was toxic in human lymphocytes but did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, using a dose range that included a dose level that either approached or induced 55±5% mitotic inhibition.
Under the test conditions, the test item was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
This study is considered as acceptable and satisfies the requirement for chromosome aberration endpoint.
Referenceopen allclose all
None
None
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Table 7.6/1: Summary of genotoxicity tests
Test n° |
Test / Guideline Reliability |
Focus |
Strains tested |
Metabolic activation |
Test concentration |
Statement |
1
VIVOTECNIA, 2009 |
Ames Test (OECD 471) K, rel. 2 |
Gene mutation |
TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, E. coli WP2 |
-S9 +S9 |
0.065, 0.19, 0.56, 1.67 and 5μL/plate (in ethanol) |
-S9: non mutagenic +S9: non mutagenic |
2 COVANCE, 2019 |
ACT (OECD 473) K, rel.2 |
Chromosomal aberration | Human lymphocytes |
-S9 +S9 |
up to cytotoxicity |
-S9 : non clastogenic +S9 : non clastogenic |
Gene mutation Assay (Test n°1):
A Bacterial Reverse mutation Assay (Ames test) was performed according to OECD guideline No. 471 with the substance (See Table 7.6/1). No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains under the test conditions, with any dose of the substance, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. The substance does not induce gene mutations in bacteria whereas all positive control chemicals (with and without metabolic activation) induced significant increase of colonies.The substance is therefore considered as non-mutagenic according to the Ames test.
Chromosomal aberration (Test n°2)
The clastogenic potential of the substance was determined using anin vitrochromosome aberration test in human lymphocytes (OECD 473), which measures the potential of a substance to increase the incidence the of structural chromosome aberrations in cultured human lymphocytes.
None of the dose levels up to the cytotoxicity limit with the substance, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation, induced significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations in either of three experiments. The substance does not induce structural aberrations in the chromosomes of human lymphocytes under activation and non-activation conditions, whereas both positive control chemicals (with and without metabolic activation) induced significant increases in the frequency of aberrant cells.The substance is therefore considered as negative for inducing chromosomal mutations in human lymphocyte cells under activation and non-activation conditions used in this assay.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Harmonized classification:
The substance has no harmonized classification for human health according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP).
Self classification:
Based on the available data, no additional classification is proposed regarding genetic toxicity according to the CLP and to the GHS.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.