Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 17 March 2020 to 16 April 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- The test was conducted in accordance with the relevant OECD test guideline and in accordance with GLP. All validity criteria were met.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
- Report date:
- 2020
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 21 July 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 31 May 2018
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Storage conditions: At room temperature protected from light
Physical description: Light orange liquid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- - S. typhimurium: Histidine gene
- E. coli: Tryptophan gene
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9:
Rat liver microsomal enzymes (S9 homogenate) were obtained from Trinova Biochem GmbH, Giessen, Germany and were prepared from male Sprague Dawley rats that had been injected intraperitoneally with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg body weight).
Each S9 batch was characterized with the mutagens benzo-(a)-pyrene (Sigma) and
2-aminoanthracene, which require metabolic activation, in tester strain TA100 at concentrations of 5 µg/plate and 2.5 µg/plate, respectively
- method of preparation of S9 mix
S9-mix was prepared immediately before use and kept refrigerated. S9-mix contained per
10 mL: 30 mg NADP (Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, United Kingdom) and 15.2 mg
glucose-6-phosphate (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in 5.5 mL Milli-Q water (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA., USA); 2 mL 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4; 1 mL 0.08 M MgCl2 solution (Merck); 1 mL 0.33 M KCl solution (Merck). The above solution was filter (0.22 µm)-sterilized. To 9.5 mL of S9-mix components 0.5 mL S9-fraction was added (5% (v/v) S9-fraction) to complete the S9-mix. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- In the first mutation experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of
1600 μg/plate in the strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies, was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
In the second mutation experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of
1600 μg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and up to 5000 μg/plate in the tester strain WP2uvrA in the pre-incubation assay. The test item did not precipitate on the plates. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies, was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethyl sulfoxide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)
Saline = physiological saline (Eurovet Animal Health, Bladel, The Netherlands), used for TA1535 without metabolic activation
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: ICR-191; 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide; 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments: two
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 1E9 cells/mL
- Test substance added in medium; in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: 30 ± 2 minutes (pre-incubation assays only)
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48 ± 4 h
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times): Not specified
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- background growth inhibition; decreased in number of revertants and/or presence of microcolonies
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity:
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
- dose-related increase in the number of revertant colonies compared to the solvent control - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is not greater than two times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 or TA98 is not greater than three times the concurrent control.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment.
A test item is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is greater than two times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 or TA98 is greater than three times the concurrent control.
b) In case a repeat experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Dose-Range Finding Test: Mutagenic Response of the test item in the Salmonella typhimurium Reverse Mutation Assay and in the Escherichia coli Reverse Mutation Assay
Direct Plate Assay
(µg/plate) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Without S9-mix
Positive control |
773 |
± |
176 |
|
1418 |
± |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
Solvent control |
120 |
± |
10 |
|
13 |
± |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
112 |
± |
14 |
|
17 |
± |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
118 |
± |
25 |
|
23 |
± |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
123 |
± |
14 |
|
20 |
± |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
123 |
± |
23 |
|
19 |
± |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
115 |
± |
25 |
|
26 |
± |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
512 |
113 |
± |
8 |
n |
20 |
± |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
1600 |
|
|
e MC |
18 |
± |
4 |
n |
|
|
|
|
|
5000 |
0 |
± |
0 |
a NP |
|
|
e NP MC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With S9-mix
Positive control |
1104 |
± |
304 |
|
297 |
± |
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
Solvent control |
88 |
± |
8 |
|
22 |
± |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
121 |
± |
30 |
|
22 |
± |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
119 |
± |
18 |
|
20 |
± |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
110 |
± |
30 |
|
20 |
± |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
117 |
± |
6 |
|
20 |
± |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
93 |
± |
26 |
|
26 |
± |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
512 |
118 |
± |
34 |
n |
27 |
± |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
1600 |
|
|
e MC |
39 |
± |
6 |
n |
|
|
|
|
|
5000 |
0 |
± |
0 |
a NP |
25 |
± |
5 |
s NP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MC |
Microcolonies |
NP |
No precipitate |
a |
Bacterial background lawn absent |
e |
Bacterial background lawn extremely reduced |
n |
Normal bacterial background lawn |
s |
Bacterial background lawn slightly reduced |
Table 2
Experiment 1: Mutagenic Response of the test item in
the Salmonella typhimurium Reverse Mutation Assay
Direct Plate Assay
(µg/plate) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Without S9-mix
Positive control |
1014 |
± |
53 |
|
1120 |
± |
9 |
|
1292 |
± |
136 |
|
Solvent control |
9 |
± |
3 |
|
6 |
± |
5 |
|
10 |
± |
1 |
|
5.4 |
11 |
± |
8 |
|
2 |
± |
2 |
|
13 |
± |
5 |
|
17 |
8 |
± |
2 |
|
6 |
± |
4 |
|
9 |
± |
4 |
|
52 |
9 |
± |
5 |
|
4 |
± |
4 |
|
8 |
± |
2 |
|
164 |
10 |
± |
2 |
|
9 |
± |
7 |
|
13 |
± |
3 |
|
512 |
11 |
± |
9 |
n |
6 |
± |
4 |
n |
23 |
± |
5 |
n |
1600 |
5 |
± |
2 |
m NP |
4 |
± |
1 |
m NP |
|
|
e NP MC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With S9-mix
Positive control |
354 |
± |
24 |
|
311 |
± |
23 |
|
1656 |
± |
337 |
|
Solvent control |
15 |
± |
11 |
|
5 |
± |
3 |
|
16 |
± |
3 |
|
5.4 |
11 |
± |
4 |
|
6 |
± |
6 |
|
21 |
± |
3 |
|
17 |
15 |
± |
8 |
|
7 |
± |
3 |
|
16 |
± |
2 |
|
52 |
14 |
± |
4 |
|
6 |
± |
4 |
|
17 |
± |
5 |
|
164 |
9 |
± |
4 |
|
7 |
± |
5 |
|
18 |
± |
3 |
|
512 |
16 |
± |
6 |
n |
7 |
± |
0 |
n |
26 |
± |
7 |
n |
1600 |
7 |
± |
4 |
m NP |
|
|
e NP MC |
27 |
± |
13 |
s NP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MC |
Microcolonies |
NP |
No precipitate |
e |
Bacterial background lawn extremely reduced |
m |
Bacterial background lawn moderately reduced |
n |
Normal bacterial background lawn |
s |
Bacterial background lawn slightly reduced |
Table 3
Experiment 2: Mutagenic Response of the test item in
the Salmonella typhimurium Reverse Mutation Assay and in the Escherichia
coli Reverse Mutation Assay
Pre-incubation Assay
(µg/plate) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without S9-mix
Positive control |
907 |
± |
31 |
|
136 |
± |
13 |
|
1879 |
± |
59 |
|
558 |
± |
68 |
|
1818 |
± |
34 |
|
Solvent control |
4 |
± |
0 |
|
7 |
± |
1 |
|
12 |
± |
2 |
|
92 |
± |
9 |
|
15 |
± |
4 |
|
5.4 |
8 |
± |
0 |
|
7 |
± |
2 |
|
5 |
± |
4 |
|
83 |
± |
9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
17 |
7 |
± |
6 |
|
7 |
± |
4 |
|
6 |
± |
3 |
|
103 |
± |
13 |
|
16 |
± |
7 |
|
52 |
8 |
± |
5 |
|
10 |
± |
3 |
|
20 |
± |
6 |
|
192 |
± |
11 |
|
15 |
± |
4 |
|
164 |
12 |
± |
5 |
n |
5 |
± |
0 |
n |
40 |
± |
6 |
n |
274 |
± |
39 |
n |
23 |
± |
4 |
|
512 |
15 |
± |
4 |
s |
5 |
± |
2 |
s |
16 |
± |
3 |
s |
83 |
± |
30 |
s |
46 |
± |
8 |
n |
1600 |
|
|
|
a NP |
|
|
|
e NP MC |
|
|
|
a NP |
|
|
|
a NP |
9 |
± |
6 |
s |
5000 |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
a NP |
With S9-mix
Positive control |
154 |
± |
14 |
|
61 |
± |
15 |
|
403 |
± |
20 |
|
1088 |
± |
28 |
|
536 |
± |
16 |
|
Solvent control |
7 |
± |
2 |
|
4 |
± |
3 |
|
13 |
± |
6 |
|
56 |
± |
4 |
|
18 |
± |
6 |
|
5.4 |
11 |
± |
6 |
|
6 |
± |
2 |
|
19 |
± |
4 |
|
83 |
± |
20 |
|
|
- |
|
|
17 |
7 |
± |
4 |
|
9 |
± |
2 |
|
18 |
± |
10 |
|
78 |
± |
8 |
|
18 |
± |
2 |
|
52 |
8 |
± |
4 |
|
7 |
± |
3 |
|
30 |
± |
10 |
|
100 |
± |
8 |
|
23 |
± |
8 |
|
164 |
13 |
± |
7 |
n |
4 |
± |
3 |
n |
58 |
± |
4 |
|
184 |
± |
60 |
n |
31 |
± |
4 |
|
512 |
13 |
± |
2 |
s |
3 |
± |
1 |
s |
46 |
± |
15 |
n |
96 |
± |
6 |
s |
52 |
± |
4 |
n |
1600 |
|
|
|
e NP MC |
|
|
|
e NP MC |
|
|
|
e NP MC |
|
|
|
a NP |
7 |
± |
4 |
s |
5000 |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
a NP |
MC |
Microcolonies |
NP |
No precipitate |
a |
Bacterial background lawn absent |
e |
Bacterial background lawn extremely reduced |
n |
Normal bacterial background lawn |
s |
Bacterial background lawn slightly reduced |
- |
Not tested |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, based on the results of this study it is concluded that the test item is mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to determine the potential of the test item and/or its metabolites to induce reverse mutations at the histidine locus in several strains of Salmonellatyphimurium (S. typhimurium; TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537), and at the tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain WP2uvrA in the presence or absence of an exogenous mammalian metabolic activation system (S9).
The test was performed in two independent experiments, at first a direct plate assay was performed and secondly a pre-incubation assay.
In the dose-range finding study, the test item was initially tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the strains TA100 and WP2uvrA in the direct plate assay. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies, was observed in both tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Results of this dose-range finding test were reported as part of the first mutation assay.
In the first mutation experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of
1600 µg/plate in the strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98. The test item did not precipitate on the plates at this dose level. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies, was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix.In the second mutation experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of
1600 µg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and up to 5000 µg/plate in the tester strain WP2uvrA in the pre-incubation assay. The test item did not precipitate on the plates. Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies, was observed in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix.In this study, acceptable responses were obtained for the negative and strain-specific positive control items indicating that the test conditions were adequate, and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
In the second experiment (pre-incubation method), the test item induced dose-related increases in the number of revertant colonies compared to the solvent control in tester strains TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA
In tester strain TA98, the increases observed where up to 3.3- fold and 4.5- fold the concurrent control, in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively.
In tester strain TA100, the increases observed where up to 3.0- fold and 3.3- fold the concurrent control, in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively.
In tester strain WP2uvrA, the increases observed where up to 3.1- fold and 2.9- fold the concurrent control, in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively.
Although the increases in tester strains TA98 and WP2uvrA were within the laboratory historical control data range, the responses were more than two- and three-fold the concurrent controls in strains WP2uvrA and TA98, respectively. In addition, the increases in tester strain TA100 were outside the historical control data range and more than two-fold the concurrent controls. Based on these observations, the increases were considered biologically relevant.
In conclusion, based on the results of this study it is concluded that the test item is mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.