Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in chemico
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- April to May 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 019
- Report date:
- 2019
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 442C (In Chemico Skin Sensitisation: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA))
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,6-bis[[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]methyl]-4-nonylphenol
- EC Number:
- 243-500-6
- EC Name:
- 2,6-bis[[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]methyl]-4-nonylphenol
- Cas Number:
- 20073-51-2
- Molecular formula:
- C25H46N2O5
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,6-bis{[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]methyl}-4-nonylphenol
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The Poliol MB 600 was found to be soluble in acetonitrile at 100 mM, therefore, acetonitrile was selected as the vehicle for this study.
Results and discussion
In vitro / in chemico
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Depeletion Cysteine
- Remarks:
- %
- Value:
- 49
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Depletion Lysine
- Remarks:
- %
- Value:
- 0
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Mean depletion (Cysteine and Lysine)
- Remarks:
- %
- Value:
- 24.5
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Maximum standard deviation (cysteine)
- Value:
- 4.69
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Maximum standard deviation (lysine)
- Value:
- 0.05
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Results of the present study indicate that, Poliol MB 600 met all the evaluation criteria to conclude as sensitisers in DPRA assay. Reference controls and positive controls met all the acceptance criteria for the controls. The cysteine peptide, used for the study, was stable throughout the study. This showed the suitability of test system and procedures used in the test facility.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- From the results of this study, under the specified experimental conditions, Poliol MB 600 was concluded as sensitizer in DPRA assay.
- Executive summary:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:This study was conducted to evaluate the skin sensitisation potential of
Poliol MB 600using synthetic heptapeptides. The method followed was as per the OECD TG 442C.Poliol MB 600was found to be soluble in acetonitrile at 100 mM.Thereforeacetonitrilewas selected as vehicle for this study.
Synthetic heptapeptides containing Lysine (Ac-RFAAKAA-COOH) or Cysteine (Ac-RFAACAA-COOH) were used as the test system in this assay.Cysteine and lysine containing peptides were incubated with positive control and test item for 24 ± 2 hours at 25 ± 2.5 ºC (in dark), separately.Relative peptide concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with gradient elution and UV detection at 220 nm. Cysteine and lysine peptide percent depletion values were calculated and used in a prediction model which allow assigning the test item to one of four reactivity classes used to support the discrimination between sensitisers and non-sensitisers (OECD, 2015).
HPLC system suitability was determined by the standard calibration curve and value of r2obtained was 0.99974 for cysteine and 0.99994 for lysine peptides, against set standard of r2> 0.99. The mean percent peptide depletion value of positive control,viz., cinnamic aldehyde was 72% for cysteine peptide and 41 % for lysine peptide. The Relative Coefficient of Variability (RCV) for the reference control B was 1.67 for cysteine peptide and 0.63 for lysine peptide. The mean peptide concentration of reference control A and B was 0.50 ± 0.05 mM. The relative coefficient of variability (RCV) for the stability of cysteine peptide in acetonitrile was 3.52 against set standard of <15%, indicating that cysteine is stable in acetonitrile. Percent peptide depletion values of Poliol MB 600 for cysteine and lysine were 49% and 0%, respectively. Mean percent depletion for Poliol MB 600 was 24.5%.
From results of this study, under specified experimental conditions, Poliol MB 600 was positive (moderate reactivity) in the DPRA assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
