Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The substance was concluded to be sensitizer.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in chemico
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- April to May 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 442C (In Chemico Skin Sensitisation: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA))
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The Poliol MB 600 was found to be soluble in acetonitrile at 100 mM, therefore, acetonitrile was selected as the vehicle for this study.
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Depeletion Cysteine
- Remarks:
- %
- Value:
- 49
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Depletion Lysine
- Remarks:
- %
- Value:
- 0
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Mean depletion (Cysteine and Lysine)
- Remarks:
- %
- Value:
- 24.5
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Maximum standard deviation (cysteine)
- Value:
- 4.69
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Maximum standard deviation (lysine)
- Value:
- 0.05
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Results of the present study indicate that, Poliol MB 600 met all the evaluation criteria to conclude as sensitisers in DPRA assay. Reference controls and positive controls met all the acceptance criteria for the controls. The cysteine peptide, used for the study, was stable throughout the study. This showed the suitability of test system and procedures used in the test facility.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- From the results of this study, under the specified experimental conditions, Poliol MB 600 was concluded as sensitizer in DPRA assay.
- Executive summary:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:This study was conducted to evaluate the skin sensitisation potential of
Poliol MB 600using synthetic heptapeptides. The method followed was as per the OECD TG 442C.Poliol MB 600was found to be soluble in acetonitrile at 100 mM.Thereforeacetonitrilewas selected as vehicle for this study.
Synthetic heptapeptides containing Lysine (Ac-RFAAKAA-COOH) or Cysteine (Ac-RFAACAA-COOH) were used as the test system in this assay.Cysteine and lysine containing peptides were incubated with positive control and test item for 24 ± 2 hours at 25 ± 2.5 ºC (in dark), separately.Relative peptide concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with gradient elution and UV detection at 220 nm. Cysteine and lysine peptide percent depletion values were calculated and used in a prediction model which allow assigning the test item to one of four reactivity classes used to support the discrimination between sensitisers and non-sensitisers (OECD, 2015).
HPLC system suitability was determined by the standard calibration curve and value of r2obtained was 0.99974 for cysteine and 0.99994 for lysine peptides, against set standard of r2> 0.99. The mean percent peptide depletion value of positive control,viz., cinnamic aldehyde was 72% for cysteine peptide and 41 % for lysine peptide. The Relative Coefficient of Variability (RCV) for the reference control B was 1.67 for cysteine peptide and 0.63 for lysine peptide. The mean peptide concentration of reference control A and B was 0.50 ± 0.05 mM. The relative coefficient of variability (RCV) for the stability of cysteine peptide in acetonitrile was 3.52 against set standard of <15%, indicating that cysteine is stable in acetonitrile. Percent peptide depletion values of Poliol MB 600 for cysteine and lysine were 49% and 0%, respectively. Mean percent depletion for Poliol MB 600 was 24.5%.
From results of this study, under specified experimental conditions, Poliol MB 600 was positive (moderate reactivity) in the DPRA assay.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vitro
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- April to May 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- activation of keratinocytes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The Poliol MB 600 was found to be soluble in dimethyl sulfoxide at 200 mM, Therefore, DMSO was selected as the vehicle for this study.
- Positive control results:
- The gene induction for positive control (i.e., trans cinnamaldehyde) was found to be >1.5 at concentrations of 16 µM, 32 µM and 64 µM in both the repetitions. The E.C1.5 value for positive control was found to be 14.44 µM and 10.36 µM in experiment 2 and 3, respectively. The mean value of E.C1.5 for positive control was found to be 12.23 µM in experiment 2 and 3, respectively. The average gene induction for positive control at 64 µM was found to be 4.06 and 5.18 for experiment 2 and 3, respectively (which lies between acceptable range of 2 and 8). Dose response with increasing gene induction at increasing dose was also observed for trans-cinnamaldehyde in experiment 2 and experiment 3.
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: Imax
- Value:
- 1.86
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: EC1.5
- Remarks:
- mM
- Value:
- 1.8
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: IC50
- Remarks:
- mM
- Value:
- -2.64
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: IC30
- Remarks:
- mM
- Value:
- 3.95
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The EC1.5 mean value for Poliol MB 600 was 1.80 mM, which was less than 200 mM. The value of maximum induction (Imax) for Poliol MB 600 was 1.92 at the tested concentration of 3.13 mM in experiment 2 and 1.80 at the tested concentration of 1.56 mM in experiment 3, which was higher than 1.5 fold. The cellular viability was 101.02% at the tested concentration of 3.13 mM in experiment 2 and 89.12% at the tested concentration of 1.56 mM in experiment 3, with induction of luciferase activity above 1.5 fold.
For Poliol MB 600 three experiments were conducted and out of these two valid experiments (experiment 2 and 3) were considered for final evaluation. As the results of experiment 1 and 2 were not comparable to each other, experiment 3 was performed for confirmation of the results.
Results of the present study indicate that, Poliol MB 600 met all the evaluation criteria to conclude as sensitisers in KeratinoSens assay. Negative and positive controls met the acceptance criteria for the controls and were correctly identified as non-sensitiser and sensitiser, respectively. This showed the suitability of test system and procedures used in the test facility. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- From the results of this study, under the specified experimental conditions, Poliol MB 600 was concluded as sensitisers in KeratinoSens assay.
- Executive summary:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:This study was conducted to evaluate the skin sensitization potential of
Poliol MB 600 based onKeratinocyte-Based ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Reporter Gene methodas recommended by OECD Test guideline 442D.Poliol MB 600 was found to be soluble at 200 mM in dimethyl sulfoxide. Therefore dimethyl sulfoxide was selected as a vehicle.Test item was tested in two independent experiments.KeratinosensTM(HaCaT) cellswereexposed to Poliol MB 600 between test concentrations of 2000 µM to 0.98 µM and positive control between concentrations of 4 to 64 µM for 48 ± 2 hours in 5+1% CO2at 37 ± 1oC. After incubationcells were analyzed for luciferase activity.Cell viability of the concurrently treated cells was also evaluated using MTT test with separate set of plate. Imaxand EC1.5values were calculated based on luciferase activity i.e., luminescence measured (reading of three plates) while IC50and IC30were calculated based on results of cytotoxicity (OD values, reading of one plate).
For positive control trans cinnamldehyde, EC1.5value was found to be12.23 µM,when run concurrently. The IC50and IC30values for Poliol MB 600 werefound to be 46.68 and 40.16 µM.
The EC1.5mean value for Poliol MB 600 was 17.96µM, which was less than 1000 µM. The value of maximum induction (Imax) for Poliol MB 600 was 1.92 at the tested concentration of 31.25µMin experiment 2 and 1.80 at the tested concentration of 15.63µMin experiment 3, which was higher than 1.5 fold. The cellular viability was 102.12% at the tested concentration of 31.25µMin experiment 2 and 89.12% at the tested concentration of 15.63µMin experiment 3, with induction of luciferase activity above 1.5 fold. Observed dose response for luciferase induction was also statistically significant.
All criteria for a valid study were met as described in the study plan.From the results of this study, under the specified experimental conditions,Poliol MB 600 wasconcluded as sensitiser in KeratinoSens assay.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.