Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 848-454-6 | CAS number: 1398610-04-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vitro
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 26 Mar to 16 Apr 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
- Report date:
- 2021
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSens™ test method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSens™ test method
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (S)-tert-butyl 5'-(5-(3,5-dichloro-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydroisoxazol-3-yl)-3'H-spiro[azetidine-3,1'-isobenzofuran]-1-carboxylate
- EC Number:
- 848-455-1
- Cas Number:
- 1398610-06-4
- Molecular formula:
- C25H22Cl2F4N2O4
- IUPAC Name:
- (S)-tert-butyl 5'-(5-(3,5-dichloro-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydroisoxazol-3-yl)-3'H-spiro[azetidine-3,1'-isobenzofuran]-1-carboxylate
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch No.: 465884
Purity: 100%
In vitro test system
- Details of test system:
- Keratinoses transgenic cell line [442D]
- Details on the study design:
- PREPARATION OF TEST SOLUTIONS
- Preparation of the test chemical stock solution
The test item was dissolved in DMSO to a final concentration of 200 mM (orange solution). The stock solution was treated with ultrasonic waves until the test item had completely dissolved. The 100-fold dilution in DMEM glutamax of 200, 100, 50, 25, 13, 6.3 and 3.1 mM showed moderate precipitate and were therefore not suitable to test. The 100-fold dilution of the 1.6 mM DMSO stock showed slight precipitation. This concentration was selected as highest concentration for the main assay (limit of solubility).
- Preparation of the test chemical serial dilutions
In the main experiments the test item was dissolved in DMSO at 1.6 mM (clear colourless
solution). From this stock 11 spike solutions in DMSO were prepared (2-fold dilution series).
The stock and spike solutions were diluted 25-fold with exposure medium. These solutions
were diluted 4-fold with exposure medium in the assay resulting in final test concentrations of
16, 7.8, 3.9, 2.0, 0.98, 0.49, 0.24, 0.12, 0.061, 0.031, 0.015 and 0.008 μM (final concentration
DMSO of 1%).
- Preparation of the positive controls
The positive control used in the case of KeratinoSensTM is Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate
(Sigma, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands), for which a 2-fold dilution series ranging from 0.78
to 25 mM were prepared in DMSO and diluted as described in paragraph 4.4.1, so that the
final concentration of the positive control ranges from 7.8 to 250 μM (final concentration
DMSO of 1%).
- Preparation of the solvent, vehicle and negative controls
The vehicle control was 1% DMSO in exposure medium. Eighteen wells were tested per plate.
On each plate three blank wells were tested (no cells and no treatment).
APPLICATION OF THE TEST CHEMICAL AND CONTROL SUBSTANCES
- Number of replicates: 3
- Number of repetitions: 2
- Test chemical concentrations
- Application procedure
- Exposure time: 48 hours
- Study evaluation and decision criteria used
A KeratinoSensTM prediction is considered positive if the following 4 conditions are all met in
2 of 2 or in the same 2 of 3 repetitions, otherwise the KeratinoSensTM prediction is considered
negative:
1. The Imax is equal or higher than (≥) 1.5-fold and statistically significantly different as
compared to the vehicle (negative) control (as determined by a two-tailed, unpaired
Student’s t-test)
2. The cellular viability is higher than (>) 70% at the lowest concentration with induction
of luciferase activity ≥ 1.5-fold (i.e. at the EC1.5 determining concentration)
3. The EC1.5 value is less than (<) 1000 μM (or < 200 μg/mL for test chemicals with no
defined MW)
4. There is an apparent overall dose-response for luciferase induction
Negative results obtained with concentrations <1000 μM or 200 μg/mL and which do not
reach cytotoxicity (< 70% viability) at the maximal tested concentration should be considered
as inconclusive.
- Description on study acceptance criteria
a) The luciferase activity induction obtained with the positive control, Ethylene glycol
dimethacrylate, should be statistically significant equal or above the threshold of 1.5
in at least one of the tested concentrations (from 7.8 to 250 μM).
b) The EC1.5 of the positive control should be within two standard deviations of the
historical mean. Moreover, the induction for Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate at 250
μM should be higher than 2-fold. If the latter criterion is not fulfilled, the doseresponse
of Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate should be carefully checked, and tests may
be accepted only if there is a clear dose-response with increasing luciferase activity
induction at increasing concentrations for the positive control.
c) Finally, the average coefficient of variation of the luminescence reading for the
vehicle (negative) control DMSO should be below 20% in each repetition which
consists of 18 wells tested. If the variability is higher, results should be discarded.
If the variability is higher, a maximum of three of the eighteen wells may be excluded
based on the Dixon’s Q-test. If the variability is still higher, the results should be
discarded.
LUCIFERASE ACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS
The Steady-Glo Luciferase Assay Buffer (10 mL) and Steady-Glo Luciferase Assay Substrate
(lyophilized) from Promega (Leiden, The Netherlands) were mixed together. The assay plates
were removed from the incubator and the medium is removed. Then 200 μL of the Steady-
Glo Luciferase substrate solution (prior to addition 1:1 mixed with exposure medium) was
added to each well. The plates were shaken for at least 5 minutes at room temperature. Plates
with the cell lysates were placed in the TECAN Infinite® M200 Pro Plate Reader to assess
the quantity of luciferase (integration time two seconds).
DATA EVALUATION
- Cytotoxicity assessment
For the KeratinoSensTM cell viability assay, medium was replaced after the 48 hour exposure
time with fresh DMEM Glutamax containing MTT and cells were incubated for 3 - 4 hours at 37°C ± 1.0°C in the presence of 5% CO2. The MTT medium was then removed and cells were
lysed overnight by adding 10% SDS solution to each well. After shaking, the absorption was measured at 570 nm with the TECAN Infinite® M200 Pro Plate Reader. - Vehicle / solvent control:
- DMSO
- Negative control:
- not applicable
- Positive control:
- EGDMA (120 M) [442D]
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Experiment 1
The positive control Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate caused a dose related induction of
the luciferase activity. The Imax was 3.58 and the EC1.5 42 μM.
Experiment 2
The positive control Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate caused a dose related induction of
the luciferase activity. The Imax was 3.57 and the EC1.5 34 μM.
In vitro / in chemico
Resultsopen allclose all
- Group:
- test chemical
- Run / experiment:
- run/experiment 1
- Parameter:
- Imax [442D]
- Value:
- 1.3
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Group:
- test chemical
- Run / experiment:
- run/experiment 2
- Parameter:
- Imax [442D]
- Value:
- 1.6
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Outcome of the prediction model:
- data inconclusive
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Experiment 1
• No precipitation was observed at the start and end of the incubation period in the 96-well
plates.
• The test item showed no toxicity. The viability of the cells was higher than 70% at all test
concentrations and therefore no IC30 and IC50 values could be calculated.
• No luminescence activity induction compared to the vehicle control was observed at any
of the test concentrations after treatment with the test item. The Imax was 1.30 and
therefore no EC1.5 could be calculated.
Experiment 2
• No precipitation was observed at the start and end of the incubation period in the 96-well
plates.
• The test item showed no toxicity. The viability of the cells was higher than 70% at all test
concentrations and therefore no IC30 and IC50 values could be calculated.
• A non-dose related luminescence activity induction was observed after treatment with the
test item. The Imax was 1.60 and the EC1.5 0.82 μM (as result of a fluctuation). Since this
was a clear outlier compared to the other dose levels in this experiment and the results
observed in the first experiment, it is likely the fluctuation was caused by an incidental
fluctuation and therefore considered not biologically relevant.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: inconclusive
- Conclusions:
- The test item showed no toxicity (no IC30 and IC50 value) in both experiments. No
biologically relevant induction of the luciferase activity (no EC1.5 value) was measured at any
of the test concentrations in the first experiment. An induction of the luciferase activity (EC1.5
value of 0.82 μM) was measured in the second experiment as result of a fluctuation up to an
Imax of 1.60-fold. Since this was a clear outlier compared to the other dose levels in this
experiment and the results observed in the first experiment, it is likely the fluctuation was
caused by an incidental fluctuation and therefore considered not biologically relevant. The
maximum luciferase activity induction (Imax) was 1.30-fold and 1.60-fold in experiment 1 and
2 respectively. The test item is classified as inconclusive in the KeratinoSensTM assay since
negative results (<1.5-fold induction; excluding the outlier value in the second experiment)
were observed at test concentrations < 1000 μM with a cell viability of >70% compared to the
vehicle control.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.