Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 853-966-8 | CAS number: 1779-34-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
- Report date:
- 2021
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 26. Jun. 2020
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 30. May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- tris(prop-2-yn-1-yl) phosphate
- EC Number:
- 853-966-8
- Cas Number:
- 1779-34-6
- Molecular formula:
- C9H9O4P
- IUPAC Name:
- tris(prop-2-yn-1-yl) phosphate
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test Item: Phosphoric acid,tri-2-propargyl ester
Batch No.: H219121101
CAS No.: 1779-34-6
EINECS-No.: 853-966-8
Molecular Formula: C9H9O4P
Molecular Weight: 212 g/mol
Purity: >= 99 % LDY196
Appearance: Yellow liquid
Homogeneity: Homogenous
Method
- Target gene:
- hisC3076, hisD3052, hisG46, hisG428, uvrB, rfa, pKM101, pAQ1
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: S9 was obtained by Trinova Biochem GmbH, Gießen
- Batch nos.: 4272 (exp. 1, 1b, 1c, 2, 2b, repetition exp. 1 / 2nd approach, exp. 2c), 4088 (exp. 1), 4209 (exp. 1b, 1c, 2, 2b, repetition exp. 1), 4335 (repetition exp. 1), 4100 (repetition exp. 1), 4318 (repeti-tion exp. 1 / 2nd approach, exp. 2c)
- Specification: produced from the livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats which were treated with Phenobarbital/5,6-Benzoflavone.
- method of preparation of S9 mix: Phosphate buffer(22.5 mL), 0.1M NADP-solution(1.0 mL), 1M G6P-solution(0.125 mL), Salt solution(0.5 mL), Rat liver S9(1.0 mL)
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): metabolic activation by microsomal enzymes (e.g., benzo(a)pyrene). - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1: 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.15, 0.05 µL/plate
Experiment 1b: 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.15, 0.05, 0.015, 0.005 µL/plate
Experiment 2: 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.63, 0.31, 0.16, 0.08 µL/plate
Experiment 2b: 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.63, 0.31, 0.16, 0.08 µL/plate
Repetition Experiment 1: 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.15, 0.05 µL/plate
Repetition Experiment 1b: 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.15, 0.05 µL/plate
Experiment 2c: 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.63, 0.31, 0.16, 0.08 µL/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle: Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- mitomycin C
- other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine, C6H7N3O2, CAS-No.: 99-56-9; 2-Amino-anthracene, C1 4H11N, CAS-No.: 613-13-8;
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation; in suspension
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20min at 37 ± 1 °C
- Exposure duration: 48 hours at 37 ±1 °C
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): mutagenic substances: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine (CAS#99-56-9), Sodium azide (CAS#26628-22-8), 2-Amino-anthracene(CAS#613-13-8), Benzo-apyrene(CAS#50-32-8) and Mitomycin C(CAS#50-07-7)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 - Rationale for test conditions:
- All negative and nearly all strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
- Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptance criteria:
- The number of revertant colonies in the negative controls is within the range of the historical control data
- The sterility controls revealed no indication of bacterial contamination
- The positive controls induced a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies within the range of the historical control data
- The determination of titre should give a number of at least 10^9 cells/mL, correlating to 100 colonies/plate after dilution.
All determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range of the test laboratory. All positive controls (diagnostic mutagens) showed mutagenic effects with and with-out metabolic activation and nearly all were within the historical control data ranges.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study it is concluded that testing of Phosphoric acid,tri-2-propargyl ester (LDY196) in the Salmonella typhimurium strains under the experi-mental conditions in this study led to an inconclusive outcome.
- Executive summary:
The study procedures described in this report were based on the most recent Guideline OECD 471 (2020) and EU Method B.13/14 (2008).
The test item Phosphoric acid,tri-2-propargyl ester (LDY196) was tested in the Bacterial reverse mutation assay with five strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537).
The test was performed in seven experiments in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, with +S9 standing for the presence of a metabolic activation, and -S9 standing for absence of metabolic activation.
After performance of Exp. 1, 1b, 1c, 2 and 2b, a transciption error in the evaluation sheet of Exp. 1 was noticed. As the corrected results showed an increase factor f(I) > 3 for TA1535, but the number of spontanous revertants was at the lower bond of the historical control data, a repetition of Exp. 1 was performed.
The invalid experiments or experimental parts are not reported in this report, but the raw data are kept in the test facility in the GLP-archive.
An overview over the experiments is given in the following table.
Table: Overview over the experiments performed
Experiment
Tested strains
Validity
Additional information
1 (plate incorporation)
TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535, TA1537
valid for TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537
invalid for TA102
results evaluated for TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537
Invalid positive controls for TA102 (+/-S9)
1b (plate incorporation)
TA102
valid for TA102 (+S9)
invalid for TA102 (-S9)
results evaluated for TA102 (+S9)
Invalid positive control for TA102 (-S9)
1c (plate incorporation)
TA102 (-S9)
invalid for TA102 (-S9)
New positive control MMC implemented for TA102 (-S9)
Solvent control DMSO for TA102 (-S9) not in historical range (mean ± 3 sd)
2 (pre-incubation)
TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535, TA1537
valid for TA98, TA100, TA102 (+S9), TA1535, TA1537
invalid for TA102 (-S9)
results evaluated for TA98, TA100, TA102 (+S9), TA1535, TA1537
Invalid positive control for TA102 (-S9)
2b (pre-incubation)
TA102 (-S9)
invalid for TA102 (-S9)
Solvent control DMSO for TA102 (-S9) not in historical range (also not inside mean ± 3 sd)
2c (pre-incubation)
TA102 (-S9)
valid
New positive control MMC implemented for TA102 (-S9)
Repetition Exp. 1 (plate incorporation)
TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535, TA1537
valid for TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537
invalid for TA100
results evaluated for TA98, TA102, TA1535, TA1537
Solvent controls for TA100 not in historical range (also not inside mean ± 3 sd)
Repetition Exp. 1 / 2ndapproach
TA100
valid
results evaluated for TA100 (+/-S9)
Experiment 1:
In the first experiment,the test item (dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) was tested up to concentrations of 5 µL/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix in the strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 using the plate incorporation method.
The test item showed no precipitates and no signs of toxicity on the plates at any of the concentrationsin boththe presence and the absence of metabolic activation.
At the highest test item concentration (5 µL/plate), a significant increase (f(I) > 3) in the number of revertants was found for TA1535 (+S9). Additionally, a dose-dependency over the tested range could be observed for TA100 (+/-S9) and TA1535 (+S9).
As the positive controls for TA102 (+/-S9) showed no positive response, exp. 1 was invalid for TA102 and was repeated in exp. 1b
Experiment 1b:
Based on the results of exp.1, the experiment was repeated for TA102 with and without metabolic activation.
For the approach with S9, a valid result could be obtained.The test item showed no precipitates and no signs of toxicity on the plates at any of the concentration.
As the positive control for TA102 (-S9) showed no positive response, exp. 1b was invalid for TA102 (-S9) and was repeated in exp. 1c.
Experiment 1c:
Based on the results of exp.1 and 1b, the experiment was repeated for TA102 without metabolic activation.
As the number of spontaneous revertants of DMSO for TA102 (-S9) was not within the historical control data, exp. 1c was invalid for TA102 (-S9). A separate repetition was not performed, but a valid result could be obtained in the repetition exp. 1.
Experiment 2:
Based on the results of the first experiment,the test item was tested up to concentrations of 5 µL/plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix in all bacteria strains using the pre-incubation method.
The test item showed no precipitates and no signs of toxicity on the plates at any of the concentrationsin boththe presence and the absence of metabolic activation.
A dose-response over the tested range could be observed for TA100 (+/-S9) and TA1535 (-S9) and in tendency also for TA1535 (+S9).
As the positive controls for TA102 (-S9) showed no positive response, exp. 2 was invalid for TA102 (-S9) and was repeated in exp. 2b.
Experiment 2b:
Based on the results of exp.2, the experiment was repeated for TA102 without metabolic activation.
As the number of spontaneous revertants of DMSO for TA102 (-S9) was not within the historical control data range, exp. 2b was invalid for TA102 (-S9).
Repetition Experiment 1:
The test item was tested up to concentrations of 5 µL/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix in the strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 using the plate incorporation method.
The test item showed no precipitates and no signs of toxicity on the plates at any of the concentrationsin boththe presence and the absence of metabolic activation.
A tendency of a dose-response over the tested range could be observed for TA1535 (-S9).
As the number of spontaneous revertants of DMSO and demin. water was not within the historical control data range, the repetition exp. 1 was not valid for TA100 (+/-S9) and was repeated.
Repetition Experiment 1 / 2ndapproach:
Thetest item was tested up to concentrations of 5 µL/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix in the strains TA100 using the plate incorporation method.
The test item showed no precipitates and no signs of toxicity on the plates at any of the concentrationsin boththe presence and the absence of metabolic activation.
A dose-response over the tested range could be observed for TA100 (+/-S9).
Experiment 2c:
Based on the results of exp. 2 and 2b, the experiment was repeated for TA102 without metabolic activation.
A valid result could be obtained. The test item showed no precipitates and no signs of toxicity on the plates at any of the concentration.
No relevant or dose-related increase in the number of revertants could be observed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.