Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Some information in this page has been claimed confidential.

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Remarks:
One primary dermal irritation study is available (Raltech Scientific Services, 1981). The primary irritation index and the scores for erythema and edema were zero at both time points for both intact and abraded skin.Cryolite was not irritating to the skin
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP compliant, preliminary irritation study (part of skin sensitisation study), adequate for assessment
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Remarks:
The read-across can be performed because trisodium hexafluoroaluminate is component parts of RAL 3.0, and is the only component with possible negative effects for human health
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Remarks:
One primary dermal irritation study is available (Raltech Scientific Services, 1981). The primary irritation index and the scores for erythema and edema were zero at both time points for both intact and abraded skin.Cryolite was not irritating to the skin
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP compliant, preliminary irritation study (part of skin sensitisation study), adequate for assessment
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Remarks:
The read-across can be performed because trisodium hexafluoroaluminate is component parts of RAL 3.0, and is the only component with possible negative effects for human health
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Preliminary irritation study (part of skin sensitisation study)
GLP compliance:
yes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): cryolite
- Physical state: off white solid
- Analytical purity: > 95%
- Lot/batch No.: 230298
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles river, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 5-9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: under 500 grams
- Housing: in air conditioned rooms
- Diet: free acces to standard guinea pig diet
- Water: free acces to tap water, diluted with decalcified water

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21
- Humidity (%): 50
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
other: aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
50%, 20%, 10%, 5%
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period:
24 and 48 hours
Number of animals:
4 (2 animals/concentration; 2 concentrations/animal)
Details on study design:
The epidermal irritancy of cryolite was investigated to select test substance concentrations suitable for the induction and challenge phase in a guinea pig maximisation test.

Epidermal application:
A series of four test substance concentrations was used; the highest concentration being the maximum concentration that could technically be applied. Two different concentrations were applied (0.5 ml each) per animal to the clipped flank, using Metalline patches# (2x3 cm) mounted on Medical tape, which were held in place with Micropore tape and subsequently Coban elastic bandage.
After 24 hours, the dressing was removed and the skin cleaned of residual test substance. The treated skin areas were assessed for irritation 24 and 48 hours after exposure.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: 50%, 20%, 10%, 5% cryolite in aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: 50%, 20%, 10%, 5% cryolite in aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: 50%, 20%, 10%, 5% cryolite in aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: 50%, 20%, 10%, 5% cryolite in aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No signs of irritation were observed to the highest test substance concentration tested in the preliminary irritation study.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
GHS criteria not met Cryolite is not irritating to the skin.
Conclusions:
The only hazardous component of RAL 3.0 is trisodium hexafluoroaluminate. It is present in amounts less than 1%. Because of this the preparation is not irritating for the skin.. No adverse health effects have been reported in RAL 3.0 product preparation workers or in those using this product.
Executive summary:

For Cryolite,in accordance to Directive 67/548/EEC and EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification is not necessary for skin, based on the available data.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1981
Report date:
1981

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Preliminary irritation study (part of skin sensitisation study)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
impurity
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Cryolite
- Substance type: slighty coloured powder
- Analytical purity: 96.9%
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: Na 31%, Al 12.6%, F 53.3%
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): cryolite
- Physical state: off white solid
- Analytical purity: > 95%
- Lot/batch No.: 230298
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles river, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 5-9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: under 500 grams
- Housing: in air conditioned rooms
- Diet: free acces to standard guinea pig diet
- Water: free acces to tap water, diluted with decalcified water

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21
- Humidity (%): 50
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
other: aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
50%, 20%, 10%, 5%
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period:
24 -48 h
Number of animals:
4 (2 animals/concentration; 2 concentrations/animal)
Details on study design:
The epidermal irritancy of cryolite was investigated to select test substance concentrations suitable for the induction and challenge phase in a guinea pig maximisation test.

Epidermal application:
A series of four test substance concentrations was used; the highest concentration being the maximum concentration that could technically be applied. Two different concentrations were applied (0.5 ml each) per animal to the clipped flank, using Metalline patches# (2x3 cm) mounted on Medical tape, which were held in place with Micropore tape and subsequently Coban elastic bandage.
After 24 hours, the dressing was removed and the skin cleaned of residual test substance. The treated skin areas were assessed for irritation 24 and 48 hours after exposure.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: 50%, 20%, 10%, 5% cryolite in aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: 50%, 20%, 10%, 5% cryolite in aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: 50%, 20%, 10%, 5% cryolite in aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: 50%, 20%, 10%, 5% cryolite in aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No signs of irritation were observed to the highest test substance concentration tested in the preliminary irritation study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
Cryolite is not irritating to the skin.
Conclusions:
The only hazardous component of RAL 3.0 is trisodium hexafluoroaluminate. It is present in amounts less than 1%. Because of this the preparation is not irritating for the skin..
No adverse health effects have been reported in RAL 3.0 product preparation workers or in those using this product.
Executive summary:

For Cryolite,in accordance to Directive 67/548/EEC and EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification is not necessary for skin, based on the available data.