Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 690-995-3 | CAS number: 756-12-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 03 May 2012 to 14 May 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted under GLP conditions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- In 2nd exp in tester strain TA100,only 2 plates of test substance conc 3330 μg/plate in presence of S9-mix were tested.All other dose levels were plated in triplicate & testing of extra plate would have given no additional info: deviation had no influence
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- In 2nd exp in tester strain TA100,only 2 plates of test substance conc 3330 μg/plate in presence of S9-mix were tested.All other dose levels were plated in triplicate & testing of extra plate would have given no additional info: deviation had no influence
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-fraction
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 100, 333, 1000, 3330, and 5000 ug test article per plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (SeccoSolv, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Vehicle used as a negative control.
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Without metabolic act TA1535: sodium azide (SA) TA1537: 2-nitrofluorene (NF) TA98: 2-nitrofluoroene (NF) TA100: methylmethanesulfonate (MMS) WP2uvrA: 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide (4-NQO) With metabolic activation All strains: 2-aminoanthracene (2AA)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:Test substance was included in the top agar.
DURATION
- Preincubation period:
- Exposure duration: 48 hours +/- 4 hours.
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays):
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- The negative control data (number of spontaneous revertants per plate) should be within the
laboratory historical range for each tester strain. Also, the positive control chemicals should produce responses in all tester strains, which are within the laboratory historical range documented for each positive control substance. Furthermore, the mean plate count should be at least three times the concurrent vehicle control group mean. - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative EU
No increase in revertant colonies was observed in either the presence or absence or S9 mix for any strain. All criteria for a valid study were met as described in the protocol. Under the conditions of the study, the test article was not mutagenic in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay in either the presence or absence of metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
The mutagenic potential of the test article (clear colorless liquid, purity 99.99%) was evaluated in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay with S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 and E. coli strain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system (S9-mix rat liver induced by Phenobarbital and B-napthoflavone). The study was performed in compliance with OECD GLP (1997). The study design was based on OECD No. 471 (1997) and EC 440/2008 B.12/14 L142 (2008). The test article was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. A dose range-finding test was performed at concentrations up to 5000ug/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix in strains TA100 and WP2uvrA. A second assay was performed in all strains at doses of 100, 333, 1000, 3330, and 5000 ug/plate in the presence or absence of S9 mix. Strain specific positive controls and vehicle controls were tested in parallel. All treatments were performed in triplicate. No increase in revertant colonies was observed in either the presence or absence or S9 mix for any strain. All criteria for a valid study were met as described in the protocol. Under the conditions of the study, the test article was not mutagenic in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay in either the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Criteria for classifying CAS# 756-12-7 as mutagenic are not met.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.