Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2016-06-29 to 2016-07-01
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
28 July 2015
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Version / remarks:
06 July 2012
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol
EC Number:
230-237-7
EC Name:
2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol
Cas Number:
6976-37-0
Molecular formula:
C8H19NO5
IUPAC Name:
2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol
Test material form:
liquid

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: Adult donors
Justification for test system used:
The EPISKIN model has been validated for irritation testing in an international trial. After a review of scientific reports and peer reviewed publications on the EPISKIN method, it showed evidence of being a reliable and relevant stand-alone test for predicting rabbit skin irritation, when the endpoint is evaluated by MTT reduction and for being used as a replacement for the Draize Skin Irritation test (OECD TG 404 and Method B.4 of Annex V to Directive 67/548/EEC) for the purposes of distinguishing between skin irritating and no- skin irritating test substances (STATEMENT OF VALIDITY OF IN-VITRO TESTS FOR SKIN IRRITATION; ECVAM; Institute for Health & Consumer Protection; Joint Research Centre; European Commission; Ispra; 27 April 2007).
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
TISSUE
- Model used: EPISKIN(TM) Small Model, manufactured by EPISKIN SNC Lyon, France
- Tissue batch number: 16-EKIN-026
- Production date: not specified
- Shipping date: not specified
- Delivery date: not specified
- Date of initiation of testing: 29.06.2016

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37 °C for 42 hours

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: 25 mL PBS solution used to thoroughly rinse the tissue once
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: none
- Modifications to validated SOP: none

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 2 mL of 0.3 mg/mL MTT per well
- Incubation time: 3 hours +/- 5 min
- Spectrophotometer: not specified
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter: not specified
- Filter bandwidth: not specified
- Linear OD range of spectrophotometer: not specified

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA: secured to batch release quality control

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3

CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE: no direct MTT interference

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 1

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
- The test substance is considered to be non-irritating to skin if the viability is greater than 50 %.
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive or irritating to skin if the viability is below or equal to 50 %.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 10 mg (to moistened skin)

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied: 10 µL

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied: 10 µL
- Concentration: 5 % aq.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
15 minutes
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
42 hours
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
mean
Value:
96
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
100
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
18
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: none
- Direct-MTT reduction: No colour change was observed after three hours of incubation. The test material did not interact with the MTT.
- Colour interference with MTT: The test item showed no ability to become coloured in contact with water. The intrinsic colour of test item is white and therefore considered to be not able to significantly stain the tissues and lead false estimate of viability.

DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY:
Prior to routine use of the method the laboratory demonstrated the technical proficiency in a separate study using the ten Proficiency Chemicals according to OECD Test Guideline No. 439.

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: Yes, the mean OD value of the three negative control tissues was 0.762. The mean OD value obtained for the positive control was 0.139 and this result corresponds to 18 % viability when compared to the results obtained from the negative control. Each calculated standard deviation value (SD) for the % viability was below 18.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Results

Substance Optical Density (OD) Viability (%)
Negative Control
1x PBS
1 0.672 88
2 0.798 105
3 0.815 107
mean 0.762 100
standard deviation (SD) 10.23
Positive Control
SDS (5 % aq.)
1 0.077 10
2 0.151 20
3 0.19 25
mean 0.139 18
standard deviation (SD) 7.55
Test item 1 0.746 98
2 0.619 81
3 0.839 110
mean 0.735 96
standard deviation (SD) 14.52

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In an experimental study according to OECD test guideline 439 under GLP conditions, the test substance did not reduce cell viability (96 % with an SD of 14.52). Therefore, it is considered not irritating to skin.
Executive summary:

An EpiSkinTMSM test with the test item has been performed to predict its irritation potential by measurement of its cytotoxic effect, as reflected in the MTT assay, according to the OECD Test Guideline No. 439.

Triplicates of the human skin model EPISKIN (Reconstructed Human Epidermis, SkinEthic Laboratories) were treated with test item and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. Exposure of the reconstructed human epidermis skin units with test item was terminated by rinsing with PBS 1x solution. Epidermis units were then incubated at 37 °C for 42 hours in an incubator with 5 % CO2. The viability of each disk was assessed by incubating the tissues for 3 hours with MTT solution at 37 °C in 5 % CO2protected from light. The precipitated formazan was then extracted using acidified isopropanol and quantified spectrophotometrically.

SDS (5 % aq.) and 1×PBS treated epidermis (three units / positive and negative control) were used as positive and negative controls respectively. For each treated tissue viability was expressed as a percentage relative to negative control.

A test item is identified as requiring classification and labelling according to UN GHS (Category 2 or Category 1), if the mean relative viability after 15 minutes exposure and 42 hours post incubation is less or equal (≤) to 50 % of the negative control.

In thisin vitroskin irritation test using the EPISKIN model, the test item did not show significantly reduced cell viability in comparison to the negative control (mean value: 96 %). All obtained test item viability results were far above 50 % when compared to the viability values obtained from the negative control. Therefore the test item was considered to be non-irritant to skin.

Positive and negative controls showed the expected cell viability values within acceptable limits.The experiment was considered to be valid.

The results obtained from thisin vitroskin irritation test, using the EPISKIN model, indicated that the test item reveals no skin irritation potential under the utilised testing conditions. The test item BIS-TRIS is considered to be non-irritant to skin and is therefore not classified (UN GHS No Category).