Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Triisodecyl phosphite (TDP) was test using the LLNA assay at concentrations of 25%, 50%, and 100%. It was positive at all test concentrations. The calculated EC3 value is 20.1%. The TDP results suggest that DP 374 should be classified as a skin sensitiser, 1B (i.e. not a strong skin sensitiser). In addition, hte

Local lymph node assay (LLNA) study of diisodecyl phenyl phosphite (Sanders 2010) showed positive responses at 50% and 100% concentrations. EC3 value was determined to be 40.6%

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
The animals were acclimatised for a period of at least 5 days, after which animals were selected at random and given a unique number marked on their tail. At the start of the study the animals weighed in the range of 15 to 23 grams and were 8-12 weeks in age.
Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
25%, 50%, 100%
No. of animals per dose:
4
Details on study design:
Five days following the first topical applications, all mice were injected via the tail vein with 250 uL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 3H-methyl thymidine (3HTdR) giving a total of 20 uCi to each mouse.
Statistics:
EC3= 20%; based on a regression analysis of the dose groups. All dose groups were positive, but there was sufficient dose-response to determine an EC3.
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: vehicle 14023.98 25% 53667.32 50% 103195.40 100% 137149.20

Concentration

dpm/node

Test / Control Ratio

Vehicle (acetone/olive oil 4:1)

1753.00

N/A

25%

6708.42

3.83

50%

12899.43

7.36

100%

17143.65

9.78

EC3= 20%

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Test substance was postive (ratio >3) at concentrations of 25, 50, and 100%. An EC3 was determined to be 20%. The results indicated that TDP is a skin sensitiser, but not a strong skin sensitiser.
Executive summary:

TDP was test using the LLNA assay at concentrations of 25%, 50%, and 100%. It was positive at all test concentrations. The calculated EC3 value is 20.1%. The results suggest that TDP should be classified as a skin sensitiser, but not a strong skin sensitiser.

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP, guideline study.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CBA/Ca
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
CBA/Ca female mice, nulliparious and non-pregnant. 5 day acclimatisation peroiod. At the start of the study the animals were 8-12 weeks old.
Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
0, 25, 50, 100%
No. of animals per dose:
4
Details on study design:
A preliminary screening test was done to ascertain the systemic toxicity/irritancy potential of the test material. Based on these results, the top dose was set at 100% (neat material), followed by lower doses at 25% and 50% dilutions in an acetone/olive oil (4:1) mixture.
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.34
Test group / Remarks:
25% concentration
Parameter:
SI
Value:
3.4
Test group / Remarks:
50% concentration
Parameter:
SI
Value:
6.3
Test group / Remarks:
100% concentration
Parameter:
EC3
Value:
0.406
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: 0% (Vehicle) - 1399.81 25% - 3270.49 50% - 4763.82 100% - 8825.35

Conc

dpm/

node

Test / Control Ratio

Result

Blank

1399.81

N/A

N/A

25%

3270.49

2.34

Negative

50%

4763.82

3.40

Positive

100%

8825.35

6.30

Positive

EC3 value = 40.6%

The draft report is in preparation.

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Weston PDDP was sensitising at concentrations of 50% and 100%. The EC3 value is 40.6% from this study.
Executive summary:

While this study indicated that Weston PDDP is a skin sensitiser, the relatively high EC3 value (40.6%) indicates that this substance is not a strong skin sensitiser.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)

Justification for classification or non-classification

Classified as a skin sensitizer based on the positive LLNA study.