Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15 - 19 Jan 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
adopted in Jul 2015
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted in Jul 2012
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Landesamt für Umwelt, Mainz, Germany

Test material

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: EpiDerm™
Source strain:
not specified
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiDerm™
- Tissue batch number: 25874
- Production date: 15 Jan 2018
- Delivery date: 16 Jan 2018

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37 ± 1 °C
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37 ± 1 °C

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
- Volume and number of washing steps: After treatment the tissues were rinsed immediately in 1-minute-intervals.

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 h
- Spectrophotometer: Anthos Reader 2010 Flexi
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter: no reference filter was used
- Linear OD range of spectrophotometer: 0.1 - 2.5

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: The quality of the EpiDerm™ tissue was assessed by undertaking a MTT cell viability test. The OD (540 - 570 nm) was 1.71 ± 0.09 (acceptance criteria: 1.0 - 3.0).
- Barrier function: The barrier function was assessed by determination of the exposure time required to reduce tissue viability by 50% (ET-50) upon application of 100 μL of 1% Triton X-100. The ET-50 value was determined to be 5.28 h.
- Contamination: The cells for EpiDerm™ tissue were screened for potential biological contaminants, such as HIV-1-virus, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus, bacteria, yeast and other fungi. No contamination was detected.

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3

CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
The test substance did not directly reduce MTT.

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive or irritant to skin if the viability is less than or equal to 50%.
- The test substance is considered to be non-irritant to skin if the viability is greater than 50%.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 30 µL

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 30 µL

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 30 µL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
35 min
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
23 h and 25 min
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Remarks:
mean value of 3 tissues
Run / experiment:
35 min of exposure with the test item
Value:
90
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Direct-MTT reduction: The test item was tested for the ability of direct MTT reduction. Since the MTT solution did not change its colour within 1 hour, direct MTT reduction by the test item had not taken place and no data correction was necessary.

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: The negative control OD values were 1.677, 1.863 and 1.746 and, thus, in the range of ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: The mean viability value was 1.9% and, thus, ≤ 20%.
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: The standard deviation of the three tissues treated with the test substance was 1.1%, treated with the negative control was 5.3% and treated with the positive control was 0.1% and, thus all standard deviations were ≤ 18%.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Mean Absorbance Values (OD 570 nm)

Designation Negative Control Reaction mass of potassium sodium phosphotartrate and potassium sodium tartrate and potassium sodium ortho-phosphate (aqueous solution) Positive Control
Mean – blank (tissue 1) 1.677 1.563 0.034
Mean – blank (tissue 2) 1.863 1.592 0.033
Mean – blank (tissue 3)  1.746 1.602 0.036
Mean of the three tissues 1.762 1.586 0.034

Table 2: Tissue Viability (%)

Designation Reaction mass of potassium sodium phosphotartrate and potassium sodium tartrate and potassium sodium ortho-phosphate (aqueous solution) Positive Control
% Tissue viability (tissue 1) 88.7% 1.9%
% Tissue viability (tissue 2) 90.4% 1.9%
% Tissue viability (tissue 3) 90.9% 2.0%
% Tissue viability (mean) 90.0% 1.9%
± SD of mean tissue viability (%) 1.1% 0.1%

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: no irritating potential according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the conducted test, the test substance did not show irritating properties in the EpiDerm™ model. The RhE-based test methods are able to identify Cat. 2 and No Cat. chemicals and can thus serve as stand-alone skin irritation methods for non-corrosives.

CLP: not classified