Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction products of 4-Diazo-3,4-dihydro-7-nitro-3-oxo-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid coupled with 7-Amino-4-hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid, subsequently chelated with Chromium(3+) and cobalt(3+), further mixed with reaction products of 2,4,6-Trichloro-1,3,5-triazine and Ethanol, 2-[(4-aminophenyl)sulfonyl]-, 1-(hydrogen sulfate), sodium salts
EC number: 948-044-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From January 12, 2018 to March 27, 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- - Source: Culture Collection of Algae at Goettingen University
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 22.3 to 22.4 °C
- pH:
- 8.1-8.8
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations for the definitive test: 1, 3.2, 10, 32 and 100 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- - Test vessel: 250ml glass Erlenmeyer
- Test volume: 100 mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3 replicates per each concentration
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 3 replicates
- Light: 4716 lux (average) - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Remarks:
- ErC50
- Effect conc.:
- 61.75 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Remarks:
- EyC50
- Effect conc.:
- 25.86 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- yield
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: algal growth
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 32 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: growth
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- 72-hours EyC50 of the reference substance was 0.79 mg/L.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- According to OECD 201 test method, the 72h-ErC50 and the 72-EyC50 of Everzol SR98 was 61.75 mg/L and 25.86 mg/L respectively. The highest test substance concentration which no observed significant adverse effect (NOEC) on algal growth was 10mg/L and the lowest test substance concentration at which was observed significant reducing effect on growth (LOEC) was 32 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
This test using the procedures outlined in the BIOAGRI Study Plan for 16264.202.078.17 and OECD 201 (OECD, 2011). The results of this OECD 201 test for Everzol SR98 show that test validity criteria was met.Under the test conditions,the 72h-ErC50 and the 72-EyC50 of Everzol SR98 was 61.75 mg/L and 25.86 mg/Lrespectively. The NOEC was 10mg/L and the LOEC was 32 mg/L.
Reference
Table 1. Nominal and Effective Concentrations of Test Solutions and Their Respective Deviations.
Nominal concentration (mg/L) |
Mean of effective concentration of test substance (Ctsmean) (mg/L) |
|Deviation| (|Dev|) (%) |
Control |
< LQ |
nd |
1 |
1.1539 |
15.39 |
3.2 |
3.0007 |
6.23 |
10 |
10.1608 |
1.61 |
32 |
31.9459 |
0.17 |
100 |
97.5803 |
2.42 |
nd: not determined.
<LQ: lower than the practical limit of quantification (1.01μg/mL)
Table 2. Daily cell counts in control replicates.
Control replicate |
Cells density (cells/mL) |
Exponential increase of the biomass of the control group – 72 hours |
|||
|
Day 0 |
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
135 |
1 |
5000 |
40000 |
200000 |
650000 |
|
2 |
5000 |
40000 |
200000 |
690000 |
|
3 |
5000 |
30000 |
220000 |
680000 |
|
Average |
5000 |
36667 |
206667 |
673333 |
Table 3. Calculation of Percentage Coefficient of Variation for section-by-section specific growth rates.
Control replicate |
Section-by-section specific growth rates (day-1) |
Average (day-1) |
Standard deviation (sd) (day-1) |
Coefficient of variation (%) %CV |
||
Day 0-1 |
Day 1-2 |
Day 2-3 |
||||
1 |
2.0794 |
1.6094 |
1.1787 |
1.6225 |
0.4505 |
27.8 |
2 |
2.0794 |
1.6094 |
1.2384 |
1.6424 |
0.4215 |
25.7 |
3 |
1.7918 |
1.9924 |
1.1285 |
1.6376 |
0.4522 |
27.6 |
Average section-by-section %CV |
27.0 |
Table 4. Calculation of Percentage Coefficient of Variation for Average Specific Growth Rates in The Control over The Study Duration.
Control replicate |
Average specific growth rates over the study duration (day-1) |
1 |
1.6225 |
2 |
1.6424 |
3 |
1.6376 |
Average specific growth rates over the study duration (day-1) |
1.6342 |
sd for average specific growth rates over the study duration (day-1) |
0.0104 |
%CV over study duration |
0.6 |
Table 5. Cells Concentration, Yield of Biomass and Yield Inhibition, Growth Rate, and Growth Rate Inhibition of Cells Compares to the Control at 24, 48, and 72 Hours at Each Tested Concentration, in the Definitive Test.
Test period (hours) |
Nominal concentration (mg/L) |
Obs* |
Cells concentration (cells/mL) |
Cells concentration average (cells/mL) |
Yield (y) (cells/mL) |
Yield inhibition (Iy) (%) |
Growth rate (μ) (day-1) |
Growth rate inhibition (Iμ) (%) |
||
R1 |
R2 |
R3 |
||||||||
24 |
Control |
NM |
40000 |
40000 |
30000 |
36667 |
31667 |
0 |
1.9924 |
0 |
1 |
NM |
40000 |
40000 |
30000 |
36667 |
31667 |
0 |
1.9924 |
0 |
|
3.2 |
NM |
40000 |
40000 |
30000 |
36667 |
31667 |
0 |
1.9924 |
0 |
|
10 |
NM |
30000 |
40000 |
40000 |
36667 |
31667 |
0 |
1.9924 |
0 |
|
32 |
NM |
30000 |
20000 |
20000 |
23333 |
18333 |
42 |
1.5404 |
23 |
|
100 |
NM |
10000 |
10000 |
10000 |
10000 |
5000 |
84 |
0.6931 |
65 |
|
48 |
Control |
NM |
200000 |
200000 |
220000 |
206667 |
201667 |
0 |
1.8608 |
0 |
1 |
NM |
210000 |
170000 |
240000 |
206667 |
201667 |
0 |
1.8608 |
0 |
|
3.2 |
NM |
180000 |
200000 |
240000 |
206667 |
201667 |
0 |
1.8608 |
0 |
|
10 |
NM |
190000 |
170000 |
190000 |
183333 |
178333 |
12 |
1.8009 |
3 |
|
32 |
NM |
100000 |
90000 |
100000 |
96667 |
91667 |
55 |
1.4809 |
20 |
|
100 |
NM |
20000 |
10000 |
10000 |
13333 |
8333 |
96 |
0.4904 |
74 |
|
72 |
Control |
NM |
650000 |
690000 |
680000 |
673333 |
668333 |
0 |
1.6343 |
0 |
1 |
NM |
680000 |
630000 |
700000 |
670000 |
665000 |
0 |
1.6326 |
0 |
|
3.2 |
NM |
710000 |
640000 |
660000 |
670000 |
665000 |
0 |
1.6326 |
0 |
|
10 |
NM |
580000 |
590000 |
680000 |
616667 |
611667 |
8 |
1.6050 |
2 |
|
32 |
NM |
270000 |
250000 |
250000 |
256667 |
251667 |
62 |
1.3128 |
20 |
|
100 |
NM |
20000 |
20000 |
20000 |
20000 |
15000 |
98 |
0.4621 |
72 |
R1, R2 and R3 = replicates
*NM = None morphological effects observed.
Description of key information
Respectively,the 72h-ErC50 and the 72-EyC50 of Everzol SR98 was 61.75 mg/L and 25.86 mg/L for Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (OECD TG201).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 61.75 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 10 mg/L
Additional information
The cell densitiesin the control have increased by an average factor of at least 16 within 2 days. The mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates in the control group were not exceed 35%. The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during the whole test period in replicate control groups were not exceed 7%. This test validity criteria was met. Under the test conditions,the 72h-ErC50 and the 72-EyC50 of Everzol SR98 was 61.75 mg/L and 25.86 mg/L respectively.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.