Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
5th Feb 2019 to 25th Feb 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
cis-N-hydroxy-3-[methyl(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin- 4-yl)amino]cyclobutanecarboxamide
EC Number:
951-622-2
Molecular formula:
C12H15N5O2
IUPAC Name:
cis-N-hydroxy-3-[methyl(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin- 4-yl)amino]cyclobutanecarboxamide

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA:J
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
20 Females (nulliparous and non-pregnant). Five females per group. Age at the Initiation of Dosing: Young adult animals (approximately 12 weeks old) were selected.
Target temperatures of 18 to 24°C with a relative target humidity of 40 to 70% were maintained. The actual daily mean temperature during the study period was 22°C with an
actual daily mean relative humidity of 42 to 47%. A 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle was maintained. Ten or greater air changes per hour with 100% fresh air (no air recirculation)
were maintained in the animal rooms.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
0%, 5%, 10%, 25%
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
Three groups of five animals were treated with one test item concentration per group. The highest test item concentration was selected from the pre-screen test. One group of five
animals was treated with the vehicle.

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
ca. 1
Variability:
+/- 0.1
Test group / Remarks:
0%
Remarks on result:
other: Vehicle Control
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
ca. 1.2
Variability:
+/-0.3
Test group / Remarks:
5%
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
No indication of skin sensitisation was detected
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
ca. 1.2
Variability:
+/-0.1
Test group / Remarks:
10%
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
No indication of skin sensitisation was detected
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
ca. 0.9
Variability:
+/-0.1
Test group / Remarks:
25%
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
No indication of skin sensitisation was detected

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Since there was no indication that the test item elicits a SI ≥ 3 when tested up to 25%, PF07085579 was not considered to be a skin sensitizer.
It was established that the EC3 value (the estimated test item concentration that will give a SI =3) (if any) exceeds 25%. The six-month reliability check with Alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde indicates that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at Charles River Den Bosch is an appropriate model for testing for contact hypersensitivity. Based on these results, PF-07085579 would not be regarded as a skin sensitizer according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines. The test item does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for sensitization by skin contact according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2017) (including all amendments) and the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments).